Sextus
15-10-2013, 04:12 PM
I’m a fan of the idea of having after reviews with photos.
You active forum guys have already made many very complimentary comments about the writing style of my reviews, and if your opinions form a survey, then it would probably be shared by most of the multitudes of casual silent visitors to the forum too.
But I think combining the two, writing plus photos, everyone would be even more enthusiastic about.
And not just the active forum members either, but all those thousands, for example, that dived into the one and only review to date to have photos included – my Lily six man gangbang piece.
But I’ve learnt that it is quite a lot of work for me to do photo reviews, both the writing and in the photography.
Hey! It isn’t that easy to fuck and photograph at the same time. You try keeping a hard on while figuring out the exposure compensation needed on an ATTL flash - let alone trying to concentrate on the timing of the shot and the composition.
But to have something to write about, I also have to do my fair share of fucking too, and, as you’d be aware, you need a hard on as a minimum requirement for that. So during a sex session in which I am also photographing, my cock ends up going up and down more times than a pussy doing the bouncing squat. My poor cock must think the rest of me is suffering, at best, from a severe indecision, or at worst, a serious case of bi-polar. :shout:
But as I do enjoy communicating in my reviews with as much vividness and presence as I can (not to mention a feeble attempt at spontaneous humour) it doesn’t mean it all comes easy – just the opposite in fact. On the plus side, because is it me, one person, doing the writing as well as the photographs, that means the two together fit like hand in glove – and so the two together therefore become greater than the sum of their parts.
I also enjoy many of the reviews I read on this forum. For a lot of the guys I can tell that these reviews are the longest pieces of writing they ever do, and I can tell that in writing them they are stretching themselves. But when we stretch ourselves is when we can surprise ourselves at the results, and so I get a lot of enjoyment from reading the genuineness and honesty in many of the guy’s reviews. It gives their reviews much more integrity than they may realise. (If anyone has ever read Ned Kelly’s Jerilderie letter, you’ll know what I mean. That letter also isn’t all that flash as literature or in grammar or spelling, but you’ll have to go a long way before you’ll hear a more genuine voice talking.)
Now I also feel I have a genuine voice, and if my stuff is a little more polished than most, I’m thankful that in the polishing the genuineness hasn’t also been rubbed off. So while, for the reason that my reviews stand on their own legs, I am not frustrated at not having photos with them, it is just that having photos would add a whole new visual dimension to them. Kind of like the development from silent pictures to sound pictures. Which was quite a big deal.
Now how are we to do this? How are we to have ongoing photo after reviews posted here? How to give you what you have already shown me, told me, you want to see, as well as read?
This wouldn’t be mere boring pornography after all. That is a fictional fantasy that we watch passively like an audience in a theatre. No, this isn’t pornography – this is documentary. In other words, it is real life, and the girls being ***ked in the photos are girls that you know that YOU CAN F**K TOO.
A quantum difference. Now you may not ever get around to doing that, but that is irrelevant, the important thing is that you know that you can if you want. So you know it isn’’t a pornographic fantasy you are looking at – it is literally a fucking option you are looking at! :shout: It is real and literal, and that is what photos add to the word pictures in the review.
Now, clearly I want to do this for the forum in future. But I’ve learnt since that it is not only a lot of work for me to do that, but for me to do my reviews with photos on a regular ongoing basis it is also going to cost me. Not just in all the time spent on writing and the image post production (costly as that is) but in actual money too. Because you know of the girls’ unspoken directive:
“Show me the cash and I’ll flash the gash.”
Well for me to flash the cash - not the gash, I don’t have one of those to flash (but I do have one for my camera) - for many of these girls to give them the incentive for me to photograph them in flagrante delicto it won’t be their nipples I’ll need to grease, but their palms. Maybe not all of them would require this, but I can see how it would ease the way and mean I could do this more often. Even though relevant parts of the faces will be anonymously blurred or facing away, I’m sure that many of these girls will still need persuading in a language they are extremely fluent in ie, financial lingo.
(Though the sensational publicity for them should be an incentive too.)
But, despite these obstacles to my doing this, photos are what you have told me you want to see – by God you have not just told me that, you have shouted that out to me. Not just you active posters, but the visitors to this forum that made up the view numbers on my one so far photographed and uploaded piece. So you want to see the wl’s in action in pictures, and I want to show them to you.
So, to my idea:
What I propose therefore is a $2.75 contribution to an account until I reach a reserve amount to fund, produce, post-produce and write my review photo essay extravaganzas.
You’ve heard of online crowdfunding to make worthy ideas succeed? Well this is like that, except that all crowdfunders get out of it is a sense of noble satisfaction, while all of you pruriant bastards, by contrast, get to read and drool at pictures of your favourite wl’s getting the tripe fucked out of them. So for me to give you what you want, in return I need you to help me make them happen.
I mean, $2.75? You can’t even get a cup of pissweak coffee for that amount these days. And all you punting ****’s are always casually mentioning your generous tipping and mentioning casually the hundreds you regularly fork over to WL’s, and talking of the thousands annually that you fork over to already wealthy brothel owners - so, erm, you same ****'s baulking at $2.75 to see pictures of and read your favourite wl in action? I doubt it!
The only weak link I can see here is those that those who are eager to contribute the $2.75 early to get the review up on the forum as soon as possible might get the shits that others will later see the review for free.
But really, would you get the shits? I mean, if you’ve already had vastly more than $2.75 worth of entertainment and information out of it, who gives a fuck about the $2.75 some other miserable ****, (supposedly a big spending punter) has tried to save? And so desperate are they to save it they will goddamn wait for the photo review as long as it takes, even if it means it never gets up, so long as that fucking $2.75 stays in their pocket.
And if in your desperation not to flick over $2.75 means you all wait on each other to act, well, all that means is the end of this idea for photo reviews. Good one!
(Sorry to unjustly defame any of you about this in advance, because I can’t really see how anyone, especially cash flashing punters like you, would be so desperate not to spend $2.75 and not want to see the forum come to life this way.)
To re-state, this isn’t strictly crowd funding, because all crowd funders get out of it is the noble satisfaction of helping some dude with his project. Whereas all of you drooling, pruriant bastards will be able to literally see some of your favourite WL’s and private girls, even agency girls, actually getting the tripe fucked out of them. And there ain’t too much nobility in that! :shout:
I have a photo review already to go - a four man gangbang featuring the spectacular redheaded squirting Jenna, including a REAL PHOTO of her pussy having a squirting orgasm, amongst the 20 clear photos of the (often comic) review. It comes in two parts - 1 and 2.
In fact that same review is online now in a very restricted gold member’s forum section, and one of the members of that forum (perhaps with hyperbole, and please excuse me while I turn away to blush) called it “another sextus masterpiece.”
Here, in fact, is a photo from it, and this the clarity and lighting you can expect from my review photos. Because, sure, I might be ok at writing, but I can tell you that I am also reasonably dab at photography too
http://i1301.photobucket.com/albums/ag116/waveflow/GB-6-copycopy_zps02384923.jpg (http://s1301.photobucket.com/user/waveflow/media/GB-6-copycopy_zps02384923.jpg.html)
This shot is a little arty, but the pics sure heat up!
Aus99 no doubt would also like all the extra eyeballs these photo review features would attract to the site.
So guys, what do you think of my idea? I’d like to do a survey first, and I’ll take your response as a survey of the silent masses out there. Do you like photo reviews? And if so, can you afford the occasional $2.75 to get them up on here, and more importantly, to keep them coming? I will have lots of extra costs to do them and this is how you can help me give them to you.
You active forum guys have already made many very complimentary comments about the writing style of my reviews, and if your opinions form a survey, then it would probably be shared by most of the multitudes of casual silent visitors to the forum too.
But I think combining the two, writing plus photos, everyone would be even more enthusiastic about.
And not just the active forum members either, but all those thousands, for example, that dived into the one and only review to date to have photos included – my Lily six man gangbang piece.
But I’ve learnt that it is quite a lot of work for me to do photo reviews, both the writing and in the photography.
Hey! It isn’t that easy to fuck and photograph at the same time. You try keeping a hard on while figuring out the exposure compensation needed on an ATTL flash - let alone trying to concentrate on the timing of the shot and the composition.
But to have something to write about, I also have to do my fair share of fucking too, and, as you’d be aware, you need a hard on as a minimum requirement for that. So during a sex session in which I am also photographing, my cock ends up going up and down more times than a pussy doing the bouncing squat. My poor cock must think the rest of me is suffering, at best, from a severe indecision, or at worst, a serious case of bi-polar. :shout:
But as I do enjoy communicating in my reviews with as much vividness and presence as I can (not to mention a feeble attempt at spontaneous humour) it doesn’t mean it all comes easy – just the opposite in fact. On the plus side, because is it me, one person, doing the writing as well as the photographs, that means the two together fit like hand in glove – and so the two together therefore become greater than the sum of their parts.
I also enjoy many of the reviews I read on this forum. For a lot of the guys I can tell that these reviews are the longest pieces of writing they ever do, and I can tell that in writing them they are stretching themselves. But when we stretch ourselves is when we can surprise ourselves at the results, and so I get a lot of enjoyment from reading the genuineness and honesty in many of the guy’s reviews. It gives their reviews much more integrity than they may realise. (If anyone has ever read Ned Kelly’s Jerilderie letter, you’ll know what I mean. That letter also isn’t all that flash as literature or in grammar or spelling, but you’ll have to go a long way before you’ll hear a more genuine voice talking.)
Now I also feel I have a genuine voice, and if my stuff is a little more polished than most, I’m thankful that in the polishing the genuineness hasn’t also been rubbed off. So while, for the reason that my reviews stand on their own legs, I am not frustrated at not having photos with them, it is just that having photos would add a whole new visual dimension to them. Kind of like the development from silent pictures to sound pictures. Which was quite a big deal.
Now how are we to do this? How are we to have ongoing photo after reviews posted here? How to give you what you have already shown me, told me, you want to see, as well as read?
This wouldn’t be mere boring pornography after all. That is a fictional fantasy that we watch passively like an audience in a theatre. No, this isn’t pornography – this is documentary. In other words, it is real life, and the girls being ***ked in the photos are girls that you know that YOU CAN F**K TOO.
A quantum difference. Now you may not ever get around to doing that, but that is irrelevant, the important thing is that you know that you can if you want. So you know it isn’’t a pornographic fantasy you are looking at – it is literally a fucking option you are looking at! :shout: It is real and literal, and that is what photos add to the word pictures in the review.
Now, clearly I want to do this for the forum in future. But I’ve learnt since that it is not only a lot of work for me to do that, but for me to do my reviews with photos on a regular ongoing basis it is also going to cost me. Not just in all the time spent on writing and the image post production (costly as that is) but in actual money too. Because you know of the girls’ unspoken directive:
“Show me the cash and I’ll flash the gash.”
Well for me to flash the cash - not the gash, I don’t have one of those to flash (but I do have one for my camera) - for many of these girls to give them the incentive for me to photograph them in flagrante delicto it won’t be their nipples I’ll need to grease, but their palms. Maybe not all of them would require this, but I can see how it would ease the way and mean I could do this more often. Even though relevant parts of the faces will be anonymously blurred or facing away, I’m sure that many of these girls will still need persuading in a language they are extremely fluent in ie, financial lingo.
(Though the sensational publicity for them should be an incentive too.)
But, despite these obstacles to my doing this, photos are what you have told me you want to see – by God you have not just told me that, you have shouted that out to me. Not just you active posters, but the visitors to this forum that made up the view numbers on my one so far photographed and uploaded piece. So you want to see the wl’s in action in pictures, and I want to show them to you.
So, to my idea:
What I propose therefore is a $2.75 contribution to an account until I reach a reserve amount to fund, produce, post-produce and write my review photo essay extravaganzas.
You’ve heard of online crowdfunding to make worthy ideas succeed? Well this is like that, except that all crowdfunders get out of it is a sense of noble satisfaction, while all of you pruriant bastards, by contrast, get to read and drool at pictures of your favourite wl’s getting the tripe fucked out of them. So for me to give you what you want, in return I need you to help me make them happen.
I mean, $2.75? You can’t even get a cup of pissweak coffee for that amount these days. And all you punting ****’s are always casually mentioning your generous tipping and mentioning casually the hundreds you regularly fork over to WL’s, and talking of the thousands annually that you fork over to already wealthy brothel owners - so, erm, you same ****'s baulking at $2.75 to see pictures of and read your favourite wl in action? I doubt it!
The only weak link I can see here is those that those who are eager to contribute the $2.75 early to get the review up on the forum as soon as possible might get the shits that others will later see the review for free.
But really, would you get the shits? I mean, if you’ve already had vastly more than $2.75 worth of entertainment and information out of it, who gives a fuck about the $2.75 some other miserable ****, (supposedly a big spending punter) has tried to save? And so desperate are they to save it they will goddamn wait for the photo review as long as it takes, even if it means it never gets up, so long as that fucking $2.75 stays in their pocket.
And if in your desperation not to flick over $2.75 means you all wait on each other to act, well, all that means is the end of this idea for photo reviews. Good one!
(Sorry to unjustly defame any of you about this in advance, because I can’t really see how anyone, especially cash flashing punters like you, would be so desperate not to spend $2.75 and not want to see the forum come to life this way.)
To re-state, this isn’t strictly crowd funding, because all crowd funders get out of it is the noble satisfaction of helping some dude with his project. Whereas all of you drooling, pruriant bastards will be able to literally see some of your favourite WL’s and private girls, even agency girls, actually getting the tripe fucked out of them. And there ain’t too much nobility in that! :shout:
I have a photo review already to go - a four man gangbang featuring the spectacular redheaded squirting Jenna, including a REAL PHOTO of her pussy having a squirting orgasm, amongst the 20 clear photos of the (often comic) review. It comes in two parts - 1 and 2.
In fact that same review is online now in a very restricted gold member’s forum section, and one of the members of that forum (perhaps with hyperbole, and please excuse me while I turn away to blush) called it “another sextus masterpiece.”
Here, in fact, is a photo from it, and this the clarity and lighting you can expect from my review photos. Because, sure, I might be ok at writing, but I can tell you that I am also reasonably dab at photography too
http://i1301.photobucket.com/albums/ag116/waveflow/GB-6-copycopy_zps02384923.jpg (http://s1301.photobucket.com/user/waveflow/media/GB-6-copycopy_zps02384923.jpg.html)
This shot is a little arty, but the pics sure heat up!
Aus99 no doubt would also like all the extra eyeballs these photo review features would attract to the site.
So guys, what do you think of my idea? I’d like to do a survey first, and I’ll take your response as a survey of the silent masses out there. Do you like photo reviews? And if so, can you afford the occasional $2.75 to get them up on here, and more importantly, to keep them coming? I will have lots of extra costs to do them and this is how you can help me give them to you.