Which forum is that ?

[HighFlyer]

http://www.smh.com.au/national/police-look-to-shut-down-vile-website-featuring-naked-australian-schoolgirls-20160817-gqufll.html

anyone found it ?

[serge_nubret]

http://www.smh.com.au/national/police-look-to-shut-down-vile-website-featuring-naked-australian-schoolgirls-20160817-gqufll.html

anyone found it ?

Nah sorry mate, I'm only into adults.

[HighFlyer]

cant be too illegal if the newspapers are accessing it to get their quotes from !

[HighFlyer]

found it - interesting (not surprising) the girls that send their pics around are all Caucasian (so far).
Can't see any naughty asians.

[BigBoy]

Maybe stay away from that site, possibly child porn...

[Mr Bastard]

From what I have learnt off the news etc, is that this site apparently steals private images, including those of under age school girls and publicly displays them, amongst legal aged girls also. So, seriously, anybody deliberately seeking to view these images on the site unnamed by the OP, knowing the story is conciously looking for child porn..........am I wrong?

If the powers that be had any IQ they would frequently view sites like our forum here and hopefully keep more than a watchful eye on those with unsavoury tastes...........

[aussiegaigin]

If it is declared to be a "child porn" site, said authorities might start taking an interest in who visits it.

[ChulSoo]

I think that's the stuff that circulating around national news lately. Admin really needs to close this thread down. Wouldn't want the Police Cyber Task Force (whatever the name is) to get hits on word-search linked to this site. Seriously, those kids (the male students fronting that nonsense) are sore idiots.

[aussiegaigin]

As long as there is no direct link to that site here, I can't see any legal harm from reporting/discussing what is already in a newspaper with national coverage. Not that I am suggesting it needs discussing.

[lee_priest]

Admin really needs to close this thread down.

I'd be cautious mate. I saw that serge_nubret bloke say the same thing, then I refreshed the thread shortly after and he was banned.

[ChulSoo]

I'd be cautious mate. I saw that serge_nubret bloke say the same thing, then I refreshed the thread shortly after and he was banned.

Really? How unfortunate. That'd be a pity then if Admin bans me, just for suggesting on threads that talks about this sort of thing to be removed from the forum. I'd take it as a sign to end my punting days, though ^^

[lamb]

I assumed 4chan?

[wilisno]

As long as there is no direct link to that site here, I can't see any legal harm from reporting/discussing what is already in a newspaper with national coverage. Not that I am suggesting it needs discussing.

Exactly ! There's no direct link posted, not even the name of the site ! There's no reason why this thread has to be removed, at least not from the order of a reincarnated banned member ! ;) ;) ;) If anybody would go through all this trouble to look for that site, it's his problem if he draws attention from the authority !