Just need a bit of common sense to see what a load of rubbish this is. Would you be able to get a hard-on when you're very ill? Your libido would probably be rock bottom. Sex is probably the last thing on your mind when you're dog-sick in bed.
Just need a bit of common sense to see what a load of rubbish this is. Would you be able to get a hard-on when you're very ill? Your libido would probably be rock bottom. Sex is probably the last thing on your mind when you're dog-sick in bed.
Boy I have a problem without the virus, it would probably disappear like a frightened turtle if I had the virus
Any disease or illness than runs down your immune system, and saps your energy levels is going to slow down your erections.
No different to a cold or flu or whatever.
But it's only temporary.
it's not necessarily a transient thing, it's a symptom of long covid.
COVID-19 increases the risk of developing erectile dysfunction (ED) by nearly six times, according to data from the first study to investigate the association between ED and COVID-19 in young men in a real-life setting.
ED can be both a short-term and a long-term complication of COVID-19, Jannini suggests.
"When offered, men should have the COVID vaccination. It also gives a whole new meaning to wearing the mask ― mask up to keep it up," he says. "It could possibly have the added benefit of preventing sexual dysfunction."
https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/2021...men-with-covid
It's a sample size of 100, hardly a definitive study!
I'll just leave this hereIMG-20210803-WA0007.jpg
Sent from my GM1910 using Tapatalk
It's not as rare as you think, actually it's normal for hospitalised cases to have long covid. I heard even some mild cases get it.
https://www1.racgp.org.au/newsgp/cli...lf-of-all-case‘Long COVID’ may occur in more than half of all hospitalised cases: research
good manBut I would still not take any chances, so I am fully vaxed
AZ vaccine is extremely low risk.
https://i.redd.it/n7f2v8w7wqc71.png
https://theconversation.com/concerne...62m1v54DgonQPQ
Here's something else to think about.IMG-20210805-WA0009.jpg
Sent from my GM1910 using Tapatalk
Trying to compare death rates using things like "mountain climbing", "hang gliding" etc. is plain nonsense and informs no one about anything.
The actual figures in Australia are a very small sample but here they are anyway, FWIW:-
87 events, 5 deaths.
Compared to administered vaccine doses this results in the following:-
Age 40-49, 3 deaths, 1:407,665
Age 50-59, 1 death, 1:1,513,656
Age 70-79, 1 death, 1:1,445,061
yes, there were (i think) 3 more deaths since the article was written but also a lot more doses administered. still an extremely low death rate.
the guy who wrote the article is very credible:
Hassan Vally, Associate Professor, La Trobe University
Epidemiologist with experience in the analysis and interpretation of health data. My interests span both infectious diseases and chronic disease epidemiology and I have published over 70 peer-reviewed articles. I teach epidemiology at postgraduate level.
This could be fake news, just look at how they depicted the chart as if comparing white men and black men