Reply With Quote9-13 west st hurstville
2 banilung st rosebery. bait and switch, fake photos, the works.... papasan is a arsehole
9-13 west st hurstville
how to avoid the obvious fakes.... I suppose some need a lesson..Originally Posted by bummer
On E&B is fairly easy to nail down...
Look at how many suburbs they are mentioning. Al look at the wording.
Its surprising how many times the same set of photo's are used for different girls all over the one city... Dee Dee isa great example.
The same girl cannot be available in Manly and Sutherland at the same time. check the different adverts.
Some of the agents are lazy, search on the names... you might find for example 6e6 as part of the name, did you know you can just search on that ?
just paly around and you might start recognising traits... oh I'm watering ... huh ?
8-10, king street. Kogarah
Interesting...can you tell me your experience at 361 sussex? i just booked an hr for this friday w a girl from that addy - Mary.
sorry for late reply penguin. ive never actually been to 361 sussex, to to be honest cant be 100% sure. however i have noticed that 3/4 of E&B ads and numbers all use this address. so i assumed that since there are way to many ads for this joint something fishy is going on.
some of the pics they use though have been damn nice so have been tempted to actually go there.
if you do go here, please let us know your experience?
Will do. Im going in a couple of wks as the chick msgd me to cancel, citing a positive r.a.t....so to me, thats encoraging that shes pro active. Checking out a Parramatta private today though, so will post review of her later.
Whats the profile link?
Don’t know if you’ve come across them before, private girl group was operating out of that block of apartments at 361 Sussex St. They’re a well known bait n switch operator, never used real photos. Be warned.
At least she was honest with you about positive test
Luckily she told you. I bet there are many that won't warn customers of positive results.
Hello again lads,
I do not have much intel about privates but a possible joint to avoid would be the CK King Massage ran by Maria.
Please do not take me wrong. And YMMV. I think she is struggling with the business after the Covid drama. The photos are slightly photoshoped.
There I go and Maria tells me that a very busty Chinese gal will be waiting for me. Yes, alright. I go for a 30 minutes walk around the Meadowbank walking trail. And the time for the moment of truth comes.
I am waiting outside and noticed a punter maybe in his mid 60s comes out of the shop. I don't care about that.
I go through the backdoor. The lady at first impression looks 'alright'. White silky skin. Then, the true colours of everyone involved surface as no other. 'Sorry darling 45 dlls for the massage'... The massage was very below basics. Yes, I admit the gal had a white silky skin. Then, for the Part 2, she removes her clothing but those juggs I was craving for were nothing but a pure illusion.
CK King Massage needs to improve. I would stick to the standard joints. Again, YMMV.
Thank you folks. Again, I am new to the After Report thing but I have been long in the game. I hope my experiences and wisdom contribute to this valuable forum.
I second this, 235 Homebush road is bait and switch
curiosity got the better of me about one of the many ads associated with 361 sussex, so had to check for myself.
it is definitely shit. the ad shows a hot young slim body. and a chubby milf answers the door trying to say its her in the pics. im so glad the top brain won out then, cause i walked.
heres another address to "mayby" avoid.
209 castlereigh st
however, if its milf you are after, the chick that answered the door is not a bad milf. i walked because the ad was a lie, but for a second i considered staying to see her cause shes still quite doable for her age.
i didnt see her naked but i reckon this chick is a fairly close match, but perhaps tits are 1 size smaller.
https://www.xvideos.com/video5449510..._are_locked_up...
this is the ad for her. https://secrethostess.com/6028/
the pics are bullshit. she is not korean. she said singpore. but she is an ok slim milf.
Thanks for the update. You gotta hate ut if the photo was incorrect.
Did she have long hair? How tall was she
□ Is the girls name completely different to the account name that it was posted under?
□ Do the photos look suspicious: photoshopped, augmented, too good to be true?
□ Are there multiple different ads using the same account, descriptions and photos?
□ Is the ad written in broken English?
□ Does it read like it was written by a horny 14 year old boy?
□ Has the phone number been used on multiple accounts?
□ Did the girl give you her exact address almost immediately after texting?
□ Are her photos unverified?
□ Did you find her ad on a free public listing escorts directory?
If you answer yes to 2 or more of those. You are almost certainly getting a bait and switch.
Agree with most of these not the broken English one though. I almost exclusively punt Asian WLs, so the broken English is to be expected. I’m more dubious of the ones that are written in perfect English unless she’s an Australian born Asian.
Another thing to look out for is photos that clearly show the girl’s face. It doesn’t mean she wants you to see her pretty face, it means that’s not her face so she doesn't mind showing it.
i went there fully expecting the photo to be incorrect, and expecting to walk.
she had long hair. height was mayby around 165. however i dont recal what, if any, shoes she was wearing.
Slightly disagreed with the first statement. I’ve seen few Asian girls do better in writing than Aussie.
Totally agreed with the second one. Probably they steal those photos from different media resources, or basically pay the girls living in their countries to take those photos.
“How many times can the same thing break your heart?”
As long as you love it
Posting Permissions
|
|
|
|