WL & ML Photos, can they be better?

[DATY]

Does a picture tell a thousand words?

Some privates in the industry pay photographers who specialise in adult work to do a portfolio. The quality is quite good. In fact superior to most of the girls profile/roster pictures I see on numerous websites around the place.

There’s often forum comment on the ML’s or WL’s not being as described or even fake pics. So obviously this thread doesn’t apply to those businesses as their revenue model is different.

Why isn’t more effort and money put into getting better quality photos uploaded?

Surely it’s got to generate more business?

[Silverfish]

They should probably do a nude shot with their faces covered or blurred, and tattoos edited out. That way punters can expect if she's got extra fat rolls hiding underneath or if she's hairy or fully shaven underneath.

I'd say Mirage 108 and SGM has the best photo galleries as most of their photos are taken in shop and not retouched. Sakura & Kyoto 206 have photos taken in shop as well but you can clearly see how much retouching the photos have gone through. It's similar to the Taylor Swift gangbang thread where they took a photo of a slim girl in shop and changed their faces to the WL they're advertising for.

[OnOnOnOn]

From my limited punting experience all I know is that if the photo was taken in the shop it gives it much more credibility. If it is from outside I just assume it is fake or a really old photo.