Some reliable shops are ruining their reputation

[Sexybee]

Some reliable shops are using heavy retouched pictures to attract punters who didn’t go these shops before, which are losing new customers’ trust. They are using photographic images, WLs’ old photos, fake pictures. You don’t have choice and have to go ahead if booking them before see real WLS though they are not your type.

My advice is Must be careful with these really beautiful pictures and try to have a look at WLS if possible. I feel sorry for those WLS and myself, because I don’t like those WLS who are very different from websites and I don’t want to make them embarrassed.

Trying to have a look before booking!!!

[Danny801]

They all do, i frequent the NS side and ive seen pics and descriptions like for Emi (J) at ns227 go from a bra busting size E when she first started to a size c.
Also, ns107 aint muh better - with the filter on all the girls look v similar . In reality half are in their 30s and a few work at Burwood14 as well which says it all!
The question i like answered is which shops have the most accurate/ unfiltered pics ?
Cheers

[RO1312]

They all do, i frequent the NS side and ive seen pics and descriptions like for Emi (J) at ns227 go from a bra busting size E when she first started to a size c.
Also, ns107 aint muh better - with the filter on all the girls look v similar . In reality half are in their 30s and a few work at Burwood14 as well which says it all!
The question i like answered is which shops have the most accurate/ unfiltered pics ?
Cheers

It usually happens in the FS joints, in the massage joints they seem to be spot on. Only blur the face

One girl I seen a while ago had tattoos in person, but the we chat she didn’t. I then only realized her arms were “touched up”

[Danny801]

Cheers Ro, thanks for insight. Ive hardly done any fs joints so cant comment

[Ghost2hauntU]

I’ve learnt many years ago that Fake pics = fake girls holds true in many cases.

[francissydney]

I can easily tell the photo if it is from Internet, but hard to whether the photos are edited. I belive most of the shops doing that.

[AHLUNGOR]

My two cents worth:

1. If the photo was taken inside the shop, surely you can tell the difference, these photos are more recent and tend to be genuine. They might still photoshop it somewhat but won’t be too far off the real thing.

2. Many WLs have their portfolio photos professionally done and these are the ones you need to be very careful, if they look too good to be true, they probably are.

Cheers


Unlike some genuine such as these, what you see is what you get!

[Sam88]

My two cents worth:

1. If the photo was taken inside the shop, surely you can tell the difference, these photos are more recent and tend to be genuine. They might still photoshop it somewhat but won’t be too far off the real thing.

2. Many WLs have their portfolio photos professionally done and these are the ones you need to be very careful, if they look too good to be true, they probably are.

Cheers


Unlike some genuine such as these, what you see is what you get!

Oh wow, Cherry's still around!

[Sibon]

Oh wow, Cherry's still around!

YES! All thanks to AHLUNGOR.

[Danny801]

Thanks Lungor, Therein lies the problem. Those pics are from around 2017 and beauty apps were not around then. Nowadays everyone is using them.

QUOTE=AHLUNGOR;2857073]My two cents worth:

1. If the photo was taken inside the shop, surely you can tell the difference, these photos are more recent and tend to be genuine. They might still photoshop it somewhat but won’t be too far off the real thing.

2. Many WLs have their portfolio photos professionally done and these are the ones you need to be very careful, if they look too good to be true, they probably are.

Cheers


Unlike some genuine such as these, what you see is what you get!






[/QUOTE]

[11Bravo]

Some reliable shops are using heavy retouched pictures to attract punters who didn’t go these shops before, which are losing new customers’ trust.

Trying to have a look before booking!!!

WHAT ?!?!?!?! Say it ain't so, Joe.. Hard to believe... Well, maybe easier to believe if you'd provided some useful personal examples rather than just a bland general statement.

BREAKING NEWS... NEWS FLASH... The ages stated by the shop might not be accurate... The horror, the horror...

And that can that has the beautiful roasted turkey on the label, doesn't mean there's a turkey inside... it's lard...

[Vincent888]

Even upmarket escorts do it. The photoshop and understated age. I know one escort who has been 32 for the last ten years.

[frisson]

My two cents worth

Ahlungor
You are the best. Great taste in women
Cherry looks amazing

[l337dude]

Why was the OP even surprised? This is the punting industry afterall, 99% of photos have been "adulterated", some more than others, occasionally you may find 100% authentic ones but it's pretty rare these days, some shops use fake photos, some heavily edited or filtered, some only slight touch-ups, some use photos from 20 years ago.

But if you believe what you see in the photos is what you'll get, then you'll be sorely disappointed, booking by photos is pretty much the same as booking blind, if you are lucky you'll get something close, if not then...you can use your imagination.

[Abracadabra]

I get the blurring and other privacy based measures but it's the blatant substitution that is infuriating.

Sometimes it isn't even close and the girl will usually confirm it!

[Flasher]

I'm usually okay if the WL turn out to be 65 percent accurate to the photo accepting the Photoshop no problem at all, but if is not the same person that's hard to accept.

[wachumba]

Photoshopping of photos happens at all shops, massage and FS.
Some are so obvious where you can see they have made the girls skinnier and boobs bigger. photos inside the shop do not make any difference and Le Soleil comes to mind where you can clearly see the photoshopping but others also do it.
Apps these days can change faces so much and even when faces have been blurred, an app has already changed the face to appear more attractive or a load of make-up makes a big difference.
Always best to meet a girl before booking.

[frisson]

Simple rule, don't trust any image online. It's not complicated

The last thing to rely on when punting is a photo. Slightly less dodgy but still needing scrutiny are photos taken from inside a shop

The fact we need to continually talk about fake photos, every year, ad infinitum and ad nauseam, shows how human beings will always really want to believe in the truth of photos

Businesses know that there will always be a sucker for fake photos, they boost business revenue, because business knows there will forever be the perpetually deceivable, who naively expect "truth in advertising''

[wilisno]

Why was the OP even surprised? This is the punting industry afterall, 99% of photos have been "adulterated", some more than others, occasionally you may find 100% authentic ones but it's pretty rare these days, some shops use fake photos, some heavily edited or filtered, some only slight touch-ups, some use photos from 20 years ago.

But if you believe what you see in the photos is what you'll get, then you'll be sorely disappointed, booking by photos is pretty much the same as booking blind, if you are lucky you'll get something close, if not then...you can use your imagination.

Exactly, I’m surprised that people are still surprised.

[frisson]

In less than 10 years, AI bots will know you better than most of your close friends. The specific AI advertisements that will target your needs, wants and preferences will be very hard to resist

If you can't deal with fake photos in 2023, then you are seriously f_cked in the near future