Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 212

Thread: Brittany Higgins / Bruce Lehmann case

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    99 King Member (帝皇會員) GoldfishMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-05-2012
    Posts
    5,681

    Brittany Higgins / Bruce Lehmann case

    Not talking about the case itself.

    Is it just me or is there like, so many hot women involved in the case??
    A few days ago, there was an ex-colleague named Lauren Gains who testified. She's quite nice...

    Today, the security guard testified and holy smokes, she looks like a porn star! Check it out, Miss Nikola Anderson (scroll down to see her pics):
    https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw...26aa333682993d

    Wtf is going on??

  2. #2
    Junior Member(有D料到)
    Join Date
    06-09-2023
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    75
    I guess I should move to Canberra to work there.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    10-10-2021
    Posts
    2,393
    Quote Originally Posted by dvu420 View Post
    I guess I should move to Canberra to work there.
    Get voted in as a MP and you'll get all the beauties.

  4. #4
    Senior Member(無間使者)
    Join Date
    24-10-2022
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    182
    OMG she looks like a troll
    Love is like a flower, you gotta let it grow

  5. #5
    Senior Member(無間使者)
    Join Date
    24-07-2023
    Posts
    102
    Looks like any other girl to me - nothing special
    and first 2 pics of her are using a filter which makes her face look smaller than it really is.

  6. #6
    99 King Member (帝皇會員) GoldfishMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-05-2012
    Posts
    5,681
    Lol, ok, maybe filtered. I like her eyebrows though. Looks vampy.

    The other girl that was on the stand was good enough to be a tv presenter at one time I think. That one's not bad.

  7. #7
    Super Fans (忠實Fans)
    Join Date
    04-02-2022
    Posts
    781
    Brittany Higgins not really my type.

  8. #8
    Super Fans (忠實Fans)
    Join Date
    25-09-2022
    Posts
    707
    Quote Originally Posted by woodland View Post
    Brittany Higgins not really my type.
    Wouldn't rape her then?

    Trust you degenerates to turn a rape case into commenting on how hot the witnesses are. That's the only value women have to you.
    Except maybe your mums and daughters and then you're probably, "How dare you comment on them!"

  9. #9
    Baby Member(留言版初哥)
    Join Date
    14-12-2023
    Posts
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by ReginaldBubbles View Post
    Wouldn't rape her then?

    Trust you degenerates to turn a rape case into commenting on how hot the witnesses are. That's the only value women have to you.
    Except maybe your mums and daughters and then you're probably, "How dare you comment on them!"
    It's a defamation case... Bruce is an innocent man according to the law, that's how it works, innocent until proven guilty, and with that fact network 10 and Wilkinson a done and dusted

  10. #10
    Super Fans (忠實Fans)
    Join Date
    25-09-2022
    Posts
    707
    Quote Originally Posted by Almac12 View Post
    It's a defamation case... Bruce is an innocent man according to the law, that's how it works, innocent until proven guilty, and with that fact network 10 and Wilkinson a done and dusted
    Yes it's a defamation case. Which means Bruce's lawyers have to prove that people knew who the project was talking about even though they didn't name him. If they can do that then it's up to channel 10 to prove it's probable that he did rape her (rather than beyond reasonable doubt as required in a criminal trial). Not unlike the Bruce Roberts-smith case. Look how that went for him. We'll see how this goes I guess.

  11. #11
    Super Fans (忠實Fans)
    Join Date
    25-09-2022
    Posts
    707
    Quote Originally Posted by Almac12 View Post
    It's a defamation case... Bruce is an innocent man according to the law, that's how it works, innocent until proven guilty, and with that fact network 10 and Wilkinson a done and dusted
    Vinnie? I'm getting paranoid now!

  12. #12
    Loyalty Member(超級無聊鬼)
    Join Date
    02-11-2021
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    1,178
    Not much to look at or brag about, though the blonde piece with the bolt-ons (mid way down the page) I wouldn't kick her out bed if she farted.

  13. #13
    99 King Member (帝皇會員) GoldfishMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-05-2012
    Posts
    5,681
    Quote Originally Posted by ReginaldBubbles View Post
    Wouldn't rape her then?

    Trust you degenerates to turn a rape case into commenting on how hot the witnesses are. That's the only value women have to you.
    Except maybe your mums and daughters and then you're probably, "How dare you comment on them!"
    What rape case? Isn't this now a defamation suit between BL and Channel 7?

  14. #14
    Super Fans (忠實Fans)
    Join Date
    25-09-2022
    Posts
    707
    Quote Originally Posted by GoldfishMan View Post
    What rape case? Isn't this now a defamation suit between BL and Channel 7?
    What's the defamation suit about?
    And if the court decides he was identified somehow, it becomes a defence of truth of rape claims.

  15. #15
    Loyalty Member(超級無聊鬼)
    Join Date
    04-12-2022
    Posts
    1,446
    Brittany was a looker back then
    Why was she was given $1.9 million payout by the taxpayer?

  16. #16
    Super Fans (忠實Fans)
    Join Date
    25-09-2022
    Posts
    707
    Quote Originally Posted by frisson View Post
    Brittany was a looker back then
    Why was she was given $1.9 million payout by the taxpayer?
    It's all very clear.

    "Higgins, who was called to give evidence by Ten and Wilkinson as part of their defence to the claim, told the court she received about $1.9 million under a settlement with the Commonwealth finalised in December last year, once legal fees and taxes were subtracted.

    The deed breaks down the gross settlement sum into five categories: $400,000 for hurt, distress and humiliation suffered by Higgins arising from alleged conduct during her employment; $1.48 million to cover lost earning capacity; $220,000 for medical expenses; $100,000 for past and future domestic assistance; and $245,000 for her legal costs." SMH

    Why you so mad about such an insignificant amount of "taxpayer dollars"? Gerry Harvey got 22 million covid dollars and didn't even get raped.

  17. #17
    Senior Member(無間使者)
    Join Date
    17-07-2019
    Posts
    136
    Quote Originally Posted by ReginaldBubbles View Post
    It's all very clear.

    "Higgins, who was called to give evidence by Ten and Wilkinson as part of their defence to the claim, told the court she received about $1.9 million under a settlement with the Commonwealth finalised in December last year, once legal fees and taxes were subtracted.

    The deed breaks down the gross settlement sum into five categories: $400,000 for hurt, distress and humiliation suffered by Higgins arising from alleged conduct during her employment; $1.48 million to cover lost earning capacity; $220,000 for medical expenses; $100,000 for past and future domestic assistance; and $245,000 for her legal costs." SMH

    Why you so mad about such an insignificant amount of "taxpayer dollars"? Gerry Harvey got 22 million covid dollars and didn't even get raped.
    Yep Labor gave our tax payer money on the untested claim made by Higgins that she won’t be able to work for 40 fucken years! Meanwhile she had a book deal worth 300 thousand dollars before the trial even began. God knows how much speaking engagements and me too rallies she’s been paid for since. How can you look at what she got paid for, using our tax money and think it’s reasonable for nothing more than an allegation?

  18. #18
    Senior Member(無間使者)
    Join Date
    28-01-2019
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    102
    Quote Originally Posted by ReginaldBubbles View Post
    It's all very clear.

    "Higgins, who was called to give evidence by Ten and Wilkinson as part of their defence to the claim, told the court she received about $1.9 million under a settlement with the Commonwealth finalised in December last year, once legal fees and taxes were subtracted.

    The deed breaks down the gross settlement sum into five categories: $400,000 for hurt, distress and humiliation suffered by Higgins arising from alleged conduct during her employment; $1.48 million to cover lost earning capacity; $220,000 for medical expenses; $100,000 for past and future domestic assistance; and $245,000 for her legal costs." SMH

    Why you so mad about such an insignificant amount of "taxpayer dollars"? Gerry Harvey got 22 million covid dollars and didn't even get raped.
    good point Reg about Gerry Harvey's 22 million. A friend informed my a small company (7 employees all up) he worked at, received $100,000 from the government covid propaganda,BS,etc. The company makes millions of dollars each year and was not affected by the BS shutdown.

  19. #19
    Junior Member(有D料到)
    Join Date
    22-01-2015
    Posts
    59
    How many soldiers who lost their lives or permanent serious injury got similar compensation?

  20. #20
    Loyalty Member(超級無聊鬼)
    Join Date
    26-02-2019
    Posts
    1,000
    Get off your high horse reggie...it's only your opinion that she's a rape victim. More than likely influenced by the left wing, biased, ABC reporting of the matter.

    The rape case against Lehmann was thrown out of court for insufficient evidence. Higgins was shown to be an unreliable witness who wiped evidence from her phone and changed her story to suit her circumstances.
    Even the prosecutor of the case was investigated and had to resign.

    I don't like Lehmann he looks creepy, but facts are facts and in this case he came out as the victim and hence the defamation case
    My level of sarcasm depends on your level of stupidity.

Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •