-
Baby Member(留言版初哥)
WL orientated statistics/correlated posts
Just a new idea which may have some benefits to improve good service, easier reviewing etc
If reviews and scores can be correlated into a WL profile, then would a WL try to improve her scores through good service? This would also differentiate the Aus99 site.
WL score is averaged from reviews and these reviews create a profile of the WL
Not sure how yet but let's say the following just as an example. Open to further brain storming!
1. Reviewer posts review and there's a template score card specific to WL reviews with a drop down box (avoid mistypes etc)
2. Reviews appear as normal
3. Scorecards get compiled into a WL profile, with references to good and bad reviews (bit like Ebay will do)
Other policies can be put into place to ensure quality - reviewer of a certain level etc
Reviewers can collect points too or something
What do you think?
-
Baby Member(留言版初哥)
Even use an urban spoon model as an example
-
I think these are great concepts to build on,
Once a WL has 20+ reviews a sniper or promoter will have a harder time having an impact on the score, until at least that level the scorecard would be too unreliable. There is no room to read between the lines on a percentage or score, whereas reading a review and noting the author can give you some valuable insight. Bro Travelmate has proved to be extremely competent in pointing out anomalies. Food for thought
-
You could call it the thread title with a slight variation:
WL oriental statistics/Korealated phosts
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules