Results 1 to 16 of 16

Thread: Dumbo Abbott has got it right for once

  1. #1
    Senior Member(無間使者)
    Join Date
    18-04-2014
    Posts
    238

    Dumbo Abbott has got it right for once

    I welcome Syrian refugees and if there was a imposed tax on our income I would be happy to part my money. Dum cunt Abbott has done the right thing for a change, I might even vote for him next time

  2. #2
    Junior Member(有D料到)
    Join Date
    12-12-2013
    Posts
    51
    As a hardcore Christian i doubt he cares about your vote. I would prefer he paid our school teachers and cops more than letting in more refugees.

  3. #3
    Loyalty Member(超級無聊鬼)
    Join Date
    06-03-2012
    Posts
    1,523
    Quote Originally Posted by weedinator View Post
    As a hardcore Christian i doubt he cares about your vote. I would prefer he paid our school teachers and cops more than letting in more refugees.
    Me too...pay our cops, nurses and teachers more. The international community should force neighbouring countries like UAE, Qatar,Saudi Arabia and ISRAEL to take in these people before we do. The Syrians are Arabic the same as these countries, so why not.

    WHITE DUDE....you clearly think that Abbott is a dumbo...would you want to go back to the previous two fuckwits in Rudd and Gillard? or that dodgy dodgy dodgy Shorten who has so far escaped two sexual assault charges as well as his shonky Union dealings.

  4. #4
    99 Premium Member (特級會員) rooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-03-2012
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    2,593
    Abbott is a moron!
    He is arguably the worst Prime Minister Australia has ever had!
    Abbott is far more convincing as a right wing, bigoted, ignorant, red neck, cracker - that's his natural stance and he should stick to it - a southpaw is a southpaw, its no good trying to change his stance.
    It's when he tries to be humanitarian, or compassionate, or intelligent or play the statesman that he looks most ridiculous.

  5. #5
    Junior Member(有D料到)
    Join Date
    01-10-2013
    Posts
    62
    How much got cost us to feed them? Where are they going to be settled ? errrrrrrrrr!!!

  6. #6
    99 God Member (神級會員) wilisno's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-03-2012
    Posts
    21,288
    Quote Originally Posted by s0019 View Post
    How much got cost us to feed them? Where are they going to be settled ? errrrrrrrrr!!!
    Refugees are not just here to be fed, in time, they will become contributing citizens too, provided they scan them properly and select the decent ones !

    Where are they going to settle ? Australia is a big country, in Sydney alone, there are 1400 newcomers/ migrants and from interstates every week, so 10-20 thousand in the country is not an unmanageable figure, just hope the government can plan the infrastructure better !
    Directory of After Reports by wilisno
    http://www.aus99forum.com/showthread...ectory+reports
    Collections of frequently used Abbreviations
    http://www.aus99forum.com/showthread...-Abbreviations

  7. #7
    99 God Member (神級會員) AHLUNGOR's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-03-2012
    Location
    From Sydney CBD to Central
    Posts
    41,625
    Quote Originally Posted by wilisno View Post
    Refugees are not just here to be fed, in time, they will become contributing citizens too, provided they scan them properly and select the decent ones !

    Where are they going to settle ? Australia is a big country, in Sydney alone, there are 1400 newcomers/ migrants and from interstates every week, so 10-20 thousand in the country is not an unmanageable figure, just hope the government can plan the infrastructure better !
    I think the plan is to settle them all over Australia and Not mainly in the capital cities which is a good move !

    One way or another, it's a humanitarian disaster and it will cost the country a lot !

    And then you wonder why all those oil rich countries in the gulf are closing their borders ?? Shouldn't the Arabs be helping other Arabs ??

  8. #8
    Super Fans (忠實Fans)
    Join Date
    06-03-2012
    Posts
    536
    I read an interesting analysis in the SMH today - The Gulf countries are by far the greatest monetary / capita donors to the regional humanitarian support agencies. They appear to be over compensating for not taking people by over spending on aid.

    It's a strategic approach that possibly makes a lot of sense in many respects - these aren't pluralistic democracies - and just because the potential migrants are often Muslim / Arabic speaking you can't then assume they immediately share the values of the locals - A major reason this part of the world is so war-torn is due to the myriad of Arabic / Muslim factions and sub-factions that can't agree on sharing resources or borders.

    The cost of the immigration scheme is moderate - but the cost of air strikes / long-range war is likely to far, far out strip it... each guided warhead is something like $700,000 and with the falling AUD these costs are only escalating as we drop more of them over a greater area.

    The real question in my mind is one of balance - The air strikes aim to get to the root cause of the problem - but are they even remotely effective?? - The IS controlled proportion of Syria is now huge. With a ~700km each-way trip back to base our planes surely don't have the upper hand on what has proven to be nimble and very efficient army.

  9. #9
    Junior Member(有D料到)
    Join Date
    22-11-2013
    Posts
    71
    how many does US take???

  10. #10
    99 God Member (神級會員) wilisno's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-03-2012
    Posts
    21,288
    Quote Originally Posted by Tiankou View Post
    how many does US take???
    If you want to make a donation to a charity, the question is how much you can afford to give, not how much others can give.
    Directory of After Reports by wilisno
    http://www.aus99forum.com/showthread...ectory+reports
    Collections of frequently used Abbreviations
    http://www.aus99forum.com/showthread...-Abbreviations

  11. #11
    99 God Member (神級會員) AHLUNGOR's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-03-2012
    Location
    From Sydney CBD to Central
    Posts
    41,625
    Quote Originally Posted by birch View Post
    I read an interesting analysis in the SMH today - The Gulf countries are by far the greatest monetary / capita donors to the regional humanitarian support agencies. They appear to be over compensating for not taking people by over spending on aid.

    It's a strategic approach that possibly makes a lot of sense in many respects - these aren't pluralistic democracies - and just because the potential migrants are often Muslim / Arabic speaking you can't then assume they immediately share the values of the locals - A major reason this part of the world is so war-torn is due to the myriad of Arabic / Muslim factions and sub-factions that can't agree on sharing resources or borders.

    The cost of the immigration scheme is moderate - but the cost of air strikes / long-range war is likely to far, far out strip it... each guided warhead is something like $700,000 and with the falling AUD these costs are only escalating as we drop more of them over a greater area.

    The real question in my mind is one of balance - The air strikes aim to get to the root cause of the problem - but are they even remotely effective?? - The IS controlled proportion of Syria is now huge. With a ~700km each-way trip back to base our planes surely don't have the upper hand on what has proven to be nimble and very efficient army.

    I wasn't paying too much attention on the issue before but started to follow a bit in the last couple of days and found out some interesting facts:

    The tragic photo of the young boy's body - apparently neither him or his parents were refugees from Syria, they have been living in Turkey in the past 3 years (way before the Syria crisis started) and they tried to move to Europe for economic reasons - and apparently they were trying to fix their teeth properly was the main reason for making the move - a direct quote from the Telegraph !

    Another fact about the refugees: over 70% of them are young male !! women and children only made up of less than 30% of the " refugees ".

    Tony Abbott has already indicated that women and children will be given priority when assessing their eligibility to be taken to Australia - single adult male are less likely to be considered. I am with the PM 100% on that - smart and sensible move !!
    Without good customer services, there will be no business!!
    「今時今日咁嘅服務態度係唔得架喇…」

    Directory of all my After Reports:
    http://www.aus99forum.com/showthread...ts-by-AHLUNGOR

    This is what RnT is all about - photo thread:
    http://www.aus99forum.com/showthread...T-is-all-about!!

  12. #12
    Senior Member(無間使者)
    Join Date
    22-04-2014
    Posts
    410
    Quote Originally Posted by AHLUNGOR View Post
    a direct quote from the Telegraph
    And hence...

    99.9% chance it is an out and out lie.

    Suggest you go to iview and watch "The Last Leg" for an appropriate dismissal of the "teethgate" story AH.

  13. #13
    Senior Member(無間使者)
    Join Date
    22-04-2014
    Posts
    410
    Quote Originally Posted by birch View Post
    I read an interesting analysis in the SMH today - The Gulf countries are by far the greatest monetary / capita donors to the regional humanitarian support agencies. They appear to be over compensating for not taking people by over spending on aid.

    It's a strategic approach that possibly makes a lot of sense in many respects - these aren't pluralistic democracies - and just because the potential migrants are often Muslim / Arabic speaking you can't then assume they immediately share the values of the locals - A major reason this part of the world is so war-torn is due to the myriad of Arabic / Muslim factions and sub-factions that can't agree on sharing resources or borders.

    The cost of the immigration scheme is moderate - but the cost of air strikes / long-range war is likely to far, far out strip it... each guided warhead is something like $700,000 and with the falling AUD these costs are only escalating as we drop more of them over a greater area.

    The real question in my mind is one of balance - The air strikes aim to get to the root cause of the problem - but are they even remotely effective?? - The IS controlled proportion of Syria is now huge. With a ~700km each-way trip back to base our planes surely don't have the upper hand on what has proven to be nimble and very efficient army.
    Quote Originally Posted by wilisno View Post
    If you want to make a donation to a charity, the question is how much you can afford to give, not how much others can give.
    Excellent responses. Both of you

    Although I would change the last part of your quote wilisno to this: "...how much others are willing to give."

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    06-03-2012
    Posts
    3,437
    Obviously someone does not agree that he got it right!

    He is voted out and we have a new Prime Minister this morning he should last to the next election with a bit of luck!

    And then we the people will get to vote!

  15. #15
    99 King Member (帝皇會員) CunningLinguist's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-01-2013
    Location
    @Y
    Posts
    6,800
    Good riddance to Mr Rabbit ...

  16. #16
    99 Premium Member (特級會員) Raybo's Avatar
    Join Date
    13-03-2013
    Posts
    3,605
    What a circus Australian politics is and has been for the last 10 years.....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •