Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 212

Thread: Brittany Higgins / Bruce Lehmann case

  1. #1
    99 King Member (帝皇會員) GoldfishMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-05-2012
    Posts
    5,582

    Brittany Higgins / Bruce Lehmann case

    Not talking about the case itself.

    Is it just me or is there like, so many hot women involved in the case??
    A few days ago, there was an ex-colleague named Lauren Gains who testified. She's quite nice...

    Today, the security guard testified and holy smokes, she looks like a porn star! Check it out, Miss Nikola Anderson (scroll down to see her pics):
    https://www.news.com.au/national/nsw...26aa333682993d

    Wtf is going on??

  2. #2
    Junior Member(有D料到)
    Join Date
    06-09-2023
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    72
    I guess I should move to Canberra to work there.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    10-10-2021
    Posts
    2,393
    Quote Originally Posted by dvu420 View Post
    I guess I should move to Canberra to work there.
    Get voted in as a MP and you'll get all the beauties.

  4. #4
    Senior Member(無間使者)
    Join Date
    24-10-2022
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    177
    OMG she looks like a troll
    Love is like a flower, you gotta let it grow

  5. #5
    Senior Member(無間使者)
    Join Date
    24-07-2023
    Posts
    102
    Looks like any other girl to me - nothing special
    and first 2 pics of her are using a filter which makes her face look smaller than it really is.

  6. #6
    99 King Member (帝皇會員) GoldfishMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-05-2012
    Posts
    5,582
    Lol, ok, maybe filtered. I like her eyebrows though. Looks vampy.

    The other girl that was on the stand was good enough to be a tv presenter at one time I think. That one's not bad.

  7. #7
    Super Fans (忠實Fans)
    Join Date
    04-02-2022
    Posts
    751
    Brittany Higgins not really my type.

  8. #8
    Super Fans (忠實Fans)
    Join Date
    25-09-2022
    Posts
    675
    Quote Originally Posted by woodland View Post
    Brittany Higgins not really my type.
    Wouldn't rape her then?

    Trust you degenerates to turn a rape case into commenting on how hot the witnesses are. That's the only value women have to you.
    Except maybe your mums and daughters and then you're probably, "How dare you comment on them!"

  9. #9
    Loyalty Member(超級無聊鬼)
    Join Date
    02-11-2021
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    1,134
    Not much to look at or brag about, though the blonde piece with the bolt-ons (mid way down the page) I wouldn't kick her out bed if she farted.

  10. #10
    99 King Member (帝皇會員) GoldfishMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-05-2012
    Posts
    5,582
    Quote Originally Posted by ReginaldBubbles View Post
    Wouldn't rape her then?

    Trust you degenerates to turn a rape case into commenting on how hot the witnesses are. That's the only value women have to you.
    Except maybe your mums and daughters and then you're probably, "How dare you comment on them!"
    What rape case? Isn't this now a defamation suit between BL and Channel 7?

  11. #11
    Loyalty Member(超級無聊鬼)
    Join Date
    04-12-2022
    Posts
    1,446
    Brittany was a looker back then
    Why was she was given $1.9 million payout by the taxpayer?

  12. #12
    Super Fans (忠實Fans)
    Join Date
    25-09-2022
    Posts
    675
    Quote Originally Posted by GoldfishMan View Post
    What rape case? Isn't this now a defamation suit between BL and Channel 7?
    What's the defamation suit about?
    And if the court decides he was identified somehow, it becomes a defence of truth of rape claims.

  13. #13
    Super Fans (忠實Fans)
    Join Date
    25-09-2022
    Posts
    675
    Quote Originally Posted by frisson View Post
    Brittany was a looker back then
    Why was she was given $1.9 million payout by the taxpayer?
    It's all very clear.

    "Higgins, who was called to give evidence by Ten and Wilkinson as part of their defence to the claim, told the court she received about $1.9 million under a settlement with the Commonwealth finalised in December last year, once legal fees and taxes were subtracted.

    The deed breaks down the gross settlement sum into five categories: $400,000 for hurt, distress and humiliation suffered by Higgins arising from alleged conduct during her employment; $1.48 million to cover lost earning capacity; $220,000 for medical expenses; $100,000 for past and future domestic assistance; and $245,000 for her legal costs." SMH

    Why you so mad about such an insignificant amount of "taxpayer dollars"? Gerry Harvey got 22 million covid dollars and didn't even get raped.

  14. #14
    Super Fans (忠實Fans)
    Join Date
    26-02-2019
    Posts
    991
    Get off your high horse reggie...it's only your opinion that she's a rape victim. More than likely influenced by the left wing, biased, ABC reporting of the matter.

    The rape case against Lehmann was thrown out of court for insufficient evidence. Higgins was shown to be an unreliable witness who wiped evidence from her phone and changed her story to suit her circumstances.
    Even the prosecutor of the case was investigated and had to resign.

    I don't like Lehmann he looks creepy, but facts are facts and in this case he came out as the victim and hence the defamation case
    My level of sarcasm depends on your level of stupidity.

  15. #15
    Baby Member(留言版初哥)
    Join Date
    27-12-2018
    Posts
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by dotcumdotinyou View Post
    Get off your high horse reggie...it's only your opinion that she's a rape victim. More than likely influenced by the left wing, biased, ABC reporting of the matter.

    The rape case against Lehmann was thrown out of court for insufficient evidence. Higgins was shown to be an unreliable witness who wiped evidence from her phone and changed her story to suit her circumstances.
    Even the prosecutor of the case was investigated and had to resign.

    I don't like Lehmann he looks creepy, but facts are facts and in this case he came out as the victim and hence the defamation case
    Nothing to do with the ABC.
    Ten and Seven are the the ones paying.
    It’s been a mess since the start - exploited by politicians and political staffers for their own purposes.
    Last edited by humanbeinglawnmower; 08-12-2023 at 06:30 AM. Reason: Additional comment

  16. #16
    Super Fans (忠實Fans)
    Join Date
    25-09-2022
    Posts
    675
    Quote Originally Posted by dotcumdotinyou View Post
    Get off your high horse reggie...it's only your opinion that she's a rape victim. More than likely influenced by the left wing, biased, ABC reporting of the matter.

    The rape case against Lehmann was thrown out of court for insufficient evidence. Higgins was shown to be an unreliable witness who wiped evidence from her phone and changed her story to suit her circumstances.
    Even the prosecutor of the case was investigated and had to resign.

    I don't like Lehmann he looks creepy, but facts are facts and in this case he came out as the victim and hence the defamation case
    High horse is always a great argument and I didn't say she was a rape victim but at least get your facts straight dotcummer. It was declared a mistrial because a juror was doing their own research and didn't go to another trial because the judge was worried about her mental health.

    But keep defending him if you want and seeing him as the victim and keep commenting on which witnesses you want to fuck by all means.

    Left wing, biased ABC etc is also always a great argument.

    Looking forward to Allan Jones' defamation case next where I'm sure he will also prove what a great guy he is.

  17. #17
    Senior Member(無間使者)
    Join Date
    17-07-2019
    Posts
    136
    Quote Originally Posted by ReginaldBubbles View Post
    It's all very clear.

    "Higgins, who was called to give evidence by Ten and Wilkinson as part of their defence to the claim, told the court she received about $1.9 million under a settlement with the Commonwealth finalised in December last year, once legal fees and taxes were subtracted.

    The deed breaks down the gross settlement sum into five categories: $400,000 for hurt, distress and humiliation suffered by Higgins arising from alleged conduct during her employment; $1.48 million to cover lost earning capacity; $220,000 for medical expenses; $100,000 for past and future domestic assistance; and $245,000 for her legal costs." SMH

    Why you so mad about such an insignificant amount of "taxpayer dollars"? Gerry Harvey got 22 million covid dollars and didn't even get raped.
    Yep Labor gave our tax payer money on the untested claim made by Higgins that she won’t be able to work for 40 fucken years! Meanwhile she had a book deal worth 300 thousand dollars before the trial even began. God knows how much speaking engagements and me too rallies she’s been paid for since. How can you look at what she got paid for, using our tax money and think it’s reasonable for nothing more than an allegation?

  18. #18
    99 King Member (帝皇會員) GoldfishMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-05-2012
    Posts
    5,582
    Quote Originally Posted by Jamez11 View Post
    Yep Labor gave our tax payer money on the untested claim made by Higgins that she won’t be able to work for 40 fucken years! Meanwhile she had a book deal worth 300 thousand dollars before the trial even began. God knows how much speaking engagements and me too rallies she’s been paid for since. How can you look at what she got paid for, using our tax money and think it’s reasonable for nothing more than an allegation?
    What's the point of arguing with him?

    First, his opinions are only that, his opinions.

    Second, surely we all know by now that Reg is ideological in his views about women, among other things? He idolizes them, they can do no wrong. Arguing with him about this matter would be like arguing with a street preacher about the existence of God. You can't win and there's no point to even go there.

  19. #19
    Super Fans (忠實Fans)
    Join Date
    25-09-2022
    Posts
    675
    Quote Originally Posted by GoldfishMan View Post
    What's the point of arguing with him?

    First, his opinions are only that, his opinions.

    Second, surely we all know by now that Reg is ideological in his views about women, among other things? He idolizes them, they can do no wrong. Arguing with him about this matter would be like arguing with a street preacher about the existence of God. You can't win and there's no point to even go there.
    Lol no I just don't hate them like you, unless you think they're fuckable, do what they're told and say what you want to hear and don't have their own opinions.
    At least you're not ideological (except about the ABC watching loony left etc etc etc).

    And we all have opinions but mine are actual more factual than yours.

  20. #20
    Loyalty Member(超級無聊鬼)
    Join Date
    04-12-2022
    Posts
    1,446
    Quote Originally Posted by humanbeinglawnmower View Post
    It’s been a mess since the start - exploited by politicians and political staffers for their own purposes.
    100%
    She admits she was extremely drunk. And admits she was not wearing underwear that night. Then went back to Parliament house with a work colleague, who bought multiple alcoholic drinks for you, in the middle of the night, to crash on a couch
    What is strange is she was paid $1.9 million and has an $100 000 cash advance to write a book, all before any court case at all had started
    That's the facts from court hearings.

    Better she had gone home early from that drinks night, and not let a man with a girlfriend buy her multiple drinks

    That's one way people would look at it

Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •