ML or WL asking you on a date

[liminal]

HE if I want it. Usually a bit of mutual response.

I have to accept what she does. I know she sometimes does private massage with other guys but I manage not to worry about what happens there.

Why would you worry? As you indicated you are just friends and Without expectations

[omguser]

I have been on a date with a WL in Singapore, once. Saw her twice (paid session) and she asked me out. Her looks were above average, seemed genuinely nice - so I agreed. She took me to a club - paid for my entry and bought me two drinks. Spent the night dancing (read grinding). She asked me back to her place - I declined. Never saw her again, did not want to get attached or develop any feelings.

Since then I have been asked out twice in Sydney, both by ML. Took one ML out for a drink - chatted and that was it. She was a little too candid about her life, and I realised that we have absolutely zero common interests. The other ML - I just never really responded to her request. Again, she was too chatty during the first session and offered FS in second session - that there was nothing left.

My experience might not be something to go by though, I just prefer to keep relationships at a distance with WL and ML.

[cuteguy]

I have been on a date with a WL in Singapore, once. Saw her twice (paid session) and she asked me out. Her looks were above average, seemed genuinely nice - so I agreed. She took me to a club - paid for my entry and bought me two drinks. Spent the night dancing (read grinding). She asked me back to her place - I declined. Never saw her again, did not want to get attached or develop any feelings.

Since then I have been asked out twice in Sydney, both by ML. Took one ML out for a drink - chatted and that was it. She was a little too candid about her life, and I realised that we have absolutely zero common interests. The other ML - I just never really responded to her request. Again, she was too chatty during the first session and offered FS in second session - that there was nothing left.

My experience might not be something to go by though, I just prefer to keep relationships at a distance with WL and ML.

Some girls might find themselves lonely here and away from their families who reside overseas. They want some intimacy and 'hugging'. I'm sure some guys would have taken up the offers even if they had no interests in the girls and the girls were not ugly.

[omguser]

Some girls might find themselves lonely here and away from their families who reside overseas. They want some intimacy and 'hugging'. I'm sure some guys would have taken up the offers even if they had no interests in the girls and the girls were not ugly.

I completely understand, sometimes a good ear and hug goes a long way. Being away from family is never easy, and honestly the two ML (Sydney) are above average looking (my opinion). I sympathise with them, it's not an easy business being in where you are essentially used and abused by countless punters without a care, me being guilty of doing just that.

My comment was mostly directed at my personality and choice, rather than questioning the ML or WL. I am more than happy to listen to them, talk to them. Majority of them are very sweet girls who are victims of circumstance. I, personally, want to remain emotionally closed off.

[holi_day]

A WL/ML only asks for a date, more specifically maybe a lunch or dinner. We automatically assume they want a relationship and be your girlfriend? Not saying we are narcissistic but most of the time, they are just lonely, plus they like you and want to spend some time not in a working room, that's it.

If a WL asks me to have a dinner, the only reason I would decline is that I don't want to have a dinner with her. A dinner is the only thing she asked for. Nothing to do with any relationship.

[omguser]

A WL/ML only asks for a date, more specifically maybe a lunch or dinner. We automatically assume they want a relationship and be your girlfriend? Not saying we are narcissistic but most of the time, they are just lonely, plus they like you and want to spend some time not in a working room, that's it.

I whole heartedly agree. My argument for against dating is simply that I don't want to be the one that gets attached, hence why I prefer to keep them at a distance.

[cuteguy]

A WL/ML only asks for a date, more specifically maybe a lunch or dinner. We automatically assume they want a relationship and be your girlfriend? Not saying we are narcissistic but most of the time, they are just lonely, plus they like you and want to spend some time not in a working room, that's it.

If a WL asks me to have a dinner, the only reason I would decline is that I don't want to have a dinner with her. A dinner is the only thing she asked for. Nothing to do with any relationship.

Many don't want a relationship because it will very difficult to keep the two separate. Some guys have issues with their girl working in the sex industry where the girl is exposed to many guys who will try to lure the girl with money and other promises. Also, their WL or ML friends will try to convince her to stay out of such relationships with customers. Having said this, some ML or WL see an opportunity to go out because they don't have a car to go to the beach or don't know the city well. This is why they will be happy to meet outside for a social outing but not to be in a serious relationship.

[Dettol]

I swear you online Romeos kill me with all these self-pleasuring posts talking about denying WL’s and ML’s requests to go out on a date because you don’t want to get attached.

You expect people to think that you are okay to pay for sex at the shops and yet somehow if you’re paying for casual sex in the forms of dinner, movies etc then that becomes too “dangerous” & would somehow made you emotionally vulnerable.

How? Your goal for both scenarios is the exact same - to have sex.
In neither scenario would you think about starting a family with these girls - probably won’t even see them again after a few fucks or when you found another tail in the next punt. (Or in my case, after I nut).

Some of the posts are so stupid or just plain cringe it’s ridiculous. I swear some of you guys think you are the shit like we don’t know your lame asses keep going back to check if anyone commented and get your little ego boost lol !

[Markin]

I swear you online Romeos kill me with all these self-pleasuring posts talking about denying WL’s and ML’s requests to go out on a date because you don’t want to get attached.

You expect people to think that you are okay to pay for sex at the shops and yet somehow if you’re paying for casual sex in the forms of dinner, movies etc then that becomes too “dangerous” & would somehow made you emotionally vulnerable.

How? Your goal for both scenarios is the exact same - to have sex.
In neither scenario would you think about starting a family with these girls - probably won’t even see them again after a few fucks or when you found another tail in the next punt. (Or in my case, after I nut).

Some of the posts are so stupid or just plain cringe it’s ridiculous. I swear some of you guys think you are the shit like we don’t know your lame asses keep going back to check if anyone commented and get your little ego boost lol !

how is not wanting to get attached an ego boost? if anything it's the opposite.

it would be an ego boost if they said they didn't want the WL/ML to get attached.

[niva321]

Not sure why Dettol getting triggered? People wanting advice for new situation is what makes you mad? Lol

[DireStraits]

Not sure why Dettol getting triggered? People wanting advice for new situation is what makes you mad? Lol

Not that I care either way, but just an observation... there's basically two types of punters:

1) those who view paying the WL/ML as a means of keeping it transactional, i.e., so she will leave after the deed is done.

2) those who view paying the WL/ML primarily as a means of receiving sexual services from her.

Looking at Dettol's comment above, it is clear which camp he falls in. The mistake he's making is assuming everyone else is in that group too.

[Markin]

Not that I care either way, but just an observation... there's basically two types of punters:

1) those who view paying the WL/ML as a means of keeping it transactional, i.e., so she will leave after the deed is done.

2) those who view paying the WL/ML primarily as a means of receiving sexual services from her.

Looking at Dettol's comment above, it is clear which camp he falls in. The mistake he's making is assuming everyone else is in that group too.

it seems he sees all interactions with the opposite sex as transactional.

[alc]

Not that I care either way, but just an observation... there's basically two types of punters:

1) those who view paying the WL/ML as a means of keeping it transactional, i.e., so she will leave after the deed is done.

2) those who view paying the WL/ML primarily as a means of receiving sexual services from her.

Looking at Dettol's comment above, it is clear which camp he falls in. The mistake he's making is assuming everyone else is in that group too.

I might not have had enough coffees yet but what's the difference between the two?

[PervySage]

I might not have had enough coffees yet but what's the difference between the two?

Lol I had few coffees already and wondered the same 😁😁😁

[Dettol]

Not sure why Dettol getting triggered? People wanting advice for new situation is what makes you mad? Lol

So you think they’re actually seeking advice?

[Dettol]

Not that I care either way, but just an observation... there's basically two types of punters:

1) those who view paying the WL/ML as a means of keeping it transactional, i.e., so she will leave after the deed is done.

2) those who view paying the WL/ML primarily as a means of receiving sexual services from her.

Looking at Dettol's comment above, it is clear which camp he falls in. The mistake he's making is assuming everyone else is in that group too.

Well, I don’t see how since those 2 are pretty much the same thing.

[warwick1]

This whole forum comprises of BS, Procrastination and Hypocrisy, I include myself in that, its just a big game.....................

[B J Hunter]

It’s our own online Jerry Springer show featuring us!
A bit tedious and repetitive at times, another day same plot, different characters. But it sure is amusing..., sometimes.
Today’s episode “Does my favourite ML really love me when she tells me I’m no.1 and can I catch anything if I DATY her but she tells me she’s clean and doesn’t do that with anyone else” stay tuned viewers!

[PervySage]

This whole forum comprises of BS, Procrastination and Hypocrisy, I include myself in that, its just a big game.....................

Of course it's a game and it's entertainment 😁

[Dettol]

It’s just like jokes - some entertain you but the bad ones do nothing but make you cringe.