Chloe Sakai is one of the few private escorts that I have repeatedly seen over the years since I started punting. I have met her over 15 times and I frequently pay her in full before we meet because I don't like the "business" aspect carrying over into the night. She is a very reliable and a fun companion, and we have developed a great connection both sexually and emotionally. Like most punters, I like to browse the various forums and reviews to see who is on the scene, and I stumbled across this thread about my favourite escort. I feel the need to post a reply here as I see this site does not seem to allow a worker to have a right of reply, which is kinda weird.

I know Chloe takes her personal safety very seriously due to some horrific experiences in the past. With the nature of her work I think prioritising personal safety is pretty much a given. A deposit is generally required by most escorts as they are dealing with a lot of time wasters, and a small deposit pretty quickly filters out those who are genuine clients, and covers the time an escort spends preparing herself. I think it's pretty relevant to point out that Chloe has many, many glowing reviews on multiple sites over the years, and from personal experience I can say she certainly deserves them. Financially, I'm sure she's not hurting and does not need to “scam” a small deposit (which would be at the expense of her reputation ...), so I'm pretty dubious regarding the above reviews. Knowing her personality, she generally stands her ground on what’s right and fair.

I brought the above “reviews” to her attention, and she was rather upset. She showed me conversations with “Derek” and “jamesm” (without compromising their phone numbers, as she is always the professional). The first “review” above appeared to stem from a simple oversight and miscommunication. It was during the time Covid started spreading and she was hesitant to see clients in case she put herself and people around her in danger. It was a hard time for most people including herself. She genuinely thought she purchased the requested egiftcard online for the refund and that Woolworths would automatically send that out to Derek. Since Derek did not contact her again, she thought everything was sorted. Later she reconfirmed with the person and he claimed that he didn’t receive the first egift card; she then generously decided to send him another one. Yet Derek did not reflect the whole truth of the incident above. The miscommunication occurred when Derek insisted on using a payment method that Chloe is not familiar with, and that is how she still wanted to refund and came up with the egfitcard to sort out the matter. The accusation about his “password being reset” is just embarrassingly childish. He did not provide any personal details, and to be honest a statement like that is just ridiculous and irresponsible. Apart from the fact Chloe is probably one of the least tech savvy people I know, anyone who has met her will know she would NEVER do such a thing! If escorts were doing password attacks on every time waster they encountered they'd never be doing anything else!

Regarding the “review” above by Jamesm, I could see from their text exchange that Chloe in fact blocked out her time, got herself ready and set out to see him; however, she was then told she would be seeing someone ELSE there and she simply could not be sure how many other people would be there as Jamesm did not even provide details about who would be present and the room number. To be honest, I would not feel safe as a guy going to some hotel room to meet multiple people I had not agreed to see, let alone as a woman, and she didn't feel safe to show up. She did generously offer other options to have a safer encounter but Jamesm’s reply was so nasty and rude that regardless of what your job is, you would immediately block him! I think the fact that he felt the need to share bank details on a public venue pretty much speaks for this guy's character.

I don’t know what Derek and Jamesm were thinking – maybe angry that they got rejected by an escort? Are they the same person? Putting fake and malicious reviews on behalf of another jealous worker? Who knows? I'm sure reader's who have a critical mind know that there are always two sides to any story. I think the number of positive reviews on punter planet (a site that allows workers to actually respond) and scarlet blue are pretty much indicative of Chloe's service and trustworthiness.

Peace out.