An interesting thread with some thought provoking dialogue, either way I think most punters are oblivious to the current laws around sexual harassment, sexual assault, sexual violation, consent, proof of paternity et al including the meaning of of the phrase 'beyond reasonable doubt' when used in a court of law.
Personally I believe SugarD's are more at risk (due to the clandestine nature of their engagement with a SB) than your average punter visiting a local licensed brothel. Regardless of the aforementioned I think punters and men across the board should be more thoughtful and careful with some of their sexual behaviours when behind closed doors.
Feel free to become more enlightened by reading some recent court rulings in Caselaw NSW....use the search function.
Below is the court ruling on a case involving an ex NRL player.
https://www.caselaw.nsw.gov.au/decis...f1ed2129ed8518