Quote Originally Posted by Double_Adapter View Post
Is it a case of 'le client n’a jamais tort' or 'caveat emptor'?

The OP was in control from the get go, yet was shortchanged by 15 minutes, leads me to believe perhaps it was the chick and/or mamasan who were in control. Either way he blew his load and left a happy man and that is the essence of punting.
... But he also paid for 15 mins of absolutely nothing. That was a glaring error from the shop.

They should've charged him for 45 mins only. If they were afraid of putting him off by telling him upfront before the deed was done, they could've pretended to be surprised at the outcome after that and refunded his 15 mins one way or another. It wasn't very well handled by the shop, TBH.

But, c'est la vie. I think prevention is the best solution. Ending a session at an odd time of the hour is just asking for trouble IMO.