Reply With QuoteNever since there are so many STDs out there. HIV is only one of them, granted that it is one that is life threatening.
The WL agreed to use one of these on both of you?
http://www.hivtestaustralia.com/11-2-x-hiv-tests.html
Never since there are so many STDs out there. HIV is only one of them, granted that it is one that is life threatening.
But doesn't it take potentially up to six weeks for the possibility of getting a positive HIV result. I mean the WL could have been doing bbfs with guys every day for weeks prior to taking such a test and still be carrying the HIV virus in her system, so no matter what the test, its still a massive risk to even consider bbfs with a WL.
I think Van Wilder said it best - 'Don't be a fool, wrap your tool!'
BBFS is nice.
Just makes you cum quicker.
Only with the Mrs though.
Always use the raincoat.
Only when I grow fat old enough and enjoyed life till boring, Mrs will be my only BB otherwise lol.
Have you ever tried protected sex after BBFS in the same session ?
That a whole new thread on its own CL!Originally Posted by CunningLinguist
Don't encourage him !!
Hmmm .....Don't encourage him !!
Cant be serious mate, a few minutes of glory for possibly the end of your life.... why would u even consider it.
What is the difference between unprotected sex and BBFS ??
I think you have misread his question ! He meant BBFS until he's about to come then put the dom on to finish it.
Directory of After Reports by wilisno
http://www.aus99forum.com/showthread...ectory+reports
Collections of frequently used Abbreviations
http://www.aus99forum.com/showthread...-Abbreviations
All too complicated!!
How about just the BBBJ and then CIM !!
Or BB tits fuck to the finish then cum on tits !
I am asking for too much may I ??
Cheers
That's another question, not an answer to his question !
Directory of After Reports by wilisno
http://www.aus99forum.com/showthread...ectory+reports
Collections of frequently used Abbreviations
http://www.aus99forum.com/showthread...-Abbreviations
Definitely no..
Would you?
still waiting for your take phobot
Why take so much risk for BBFS? If the WL offers it to you then she would be doing the same to anyone? Also wouldn't those who do BBFS be the ones most prone to passing on disease since they are the 'risk-takers'? If you had an STI maybe using WL is your only outlet..
See below for clarification on testing (wikipedia)
"HIV antibody tests are specifically designed for routine diagnostic testing of adults; these tests are inexpensive and extremely accurate.
Window period
Antibody tests may give false negative (no antibodies were detected despite the presence of HIV) results during the window period, an interval of three weeks to six months between the time of HIV infection and the production of measurable antibodies to HIV seroconversion. Most people develop detectable antibodies approximately 30 days after infection, although some seroconvert later. The vast majority of people (97%) have detectable antibodies by three months after HIV infection; a six-month window is extremely rare with modern antibody testing"
I would, but only if it became mandatory practice in every shop for every punt. Adding $40 to each punt would be worth it.
Yes I know there is a window period before antibodies can be detected, but I also once read most people, like 90% will develop antibodies within 2 weeks. As quoted above, 97% within 3 months and 3% out to 6 months.
Infection rates for HIV are fairly low as long as there are no cuts or open wounds.
That said, you can still pick up less deadly, but still embarrassing things from doing it bareback.
You'd probably still have better odds with a WL than a club skank, though.
Posting Permissions
|
|
|
|