Reply With QuoteI hope all u cunts r clean
I cant believe some of the response to my first post that I read. It's not sour grapes to competition that I am concerned about it when the Playing field isn't fair.
Let'sook at the 2 shops.
Any brothel
Pays licence and fees
Shop and girls pay tax on earnings
Sex and health check ups every 3 months
Workers are are entitled to work with correct visas
R audited
Massage shop
No licenace
Girls are payed cash
No health checks
Not on work visas
Let's look at 2 cases.
1) booked glory had massage she did front bodyslide bare genital on genital. Body fluid was passed from one to the other. She then let us give her oral. And insert fingers into her anus.
2) booked Eva had massage was offered unprotected sex halfway in. Said no, she then offered and preformed bbbj
This is not all that these girls have offered just examples. So guys feel free to pick up sti if u wish. As long as these shops pay what the rest of us pay I do t care
I hope all u cunts r clean
who gets to do the sex check up?? and health check up every three months?? how many customers between check ups??? just wondering
It's a legal requirementOriginally Posted by pommychris
Actually, yes it is.
You are complaining about how unfair it is. That is sour grapes.
You are targeting a specific shop, claiming that they are responsible for the down turn in your business in the past 6 months, when nothing at this shop has changed in the past 6 months. That is sour grapes.
If you had a genuine problem with this shop you would have being making this complaint constantly for the past 5 years at least. Instead you are saying that something has changed in the past 6 months, ie greater competition from all the new massage shops being opened, and you are taking your frustration out on the easiest target. That IS sour grapes.
Complaining about illicit, illegal activity undercutting the industry is not sour grapes, it is a legitimate grievance. If they were offering a legal yet superior service and we just did not want to compete, that would be an argument but alas it is all justifying your illegal actions.
Instead you pay some shop owner who is probably holding the passport of his girls and makes them work for next to no money to tug you off in a massage shop nestled between perfectly legitimate businesses.
Personally, I'm not interested in unsafe practices. A question to the forum, does that have anything to do with brothels who consistently provide sub-par services, have rude girls and change extra upon extra upon extra for more sub-par services?
You must be, to constantly attend illegal prostitution venues in search of unsafe sex practices (unprotected handjobs, girl should use rubber glove by law).
Girls are fresh, hot, friendly and MUST WORK WITHIN THE BOUNDS OF THE LAW.
Extra extra is no different to massage shop.
I go for massages. At $60 an hour you mostly get a friendly girl giving an oil massage, usually with a smile. Massages in brothels are with a rubber glove. Very safe yes.
Everyone know what goes on at Stanley and stones corner just matter of time before police will do something about it these shops do nothing for me there more interested in offering all these extra for $$ than offering a great massage .. Plus I would not take risk being involved in a raid .
Sour Grapes
Noun
the attitude of affecting to despise something because one cannot or does not have it oneself.
You and your business partner are not complaining because you abhor the illegal activities, you are whining about others getting business that you feel you should be getting. That IS sour grapes.
For the relatively new here, what shop is he/she defending?
I doubt he will say which brothel he is from. Considering he is targeting Stoneham and Cloud 9, I suspect he is from 88 on Logan or Cleo's on Nile. Not sure if Debbie or Lynette would appreciate the bad publicity he is generating.
Maybe he's nobody from nowhere.
Pretty sure I've never had a protected handjob at either 88 or Cleos . Since they therefore offer unsafe sex practices perhaps I should complain about that?
OP has called triple zee-wah!
Came across this old chestnut , worth a review given recent shop history . There certainly were plenty of parties wanting to close the joint . It is certainly resilient!!
I font think this person is a brothel owner maybe ex BF or occasional sex partner.if his so concerned why was he doing this with a girl everyone already knows be careful. No one in there right mind would be doing anything with them without protection. But now he wont have much to worry about because both of them will have to change there names and move on. Good job buddy.
that may be so, but it took 10 months after the fact before anything happened really. they have been investigating the months prior but still its hard to tell when it will occur.
Its curious that the original post has been edited to delete the names of other girls ,maybe they turned out to be innocent after all
Posting Permissions
|
|
|
|