(Some) Reviews are too generous!

[manjuice333]

Probably pissing into the wind a bit here, but I need to rant. I'm probably also part of the problem..

It frustrates me that you read some reviews and the descriptions are overly generous. I'm somewhat reluctant to critcise the opinions of fellow punters though, especially when I don't write reviews as often.. I do chime in with my opinions though lol.

When I say some, I suspect it's a substantial percentage. I don't know exactly but seems to have happened to me a few times.

I went to see a girl today based on her supposedly having 'great tits'. The tits were slightly below 'meh' I would say and her body overall was not great. Not even approaching great, or even in the ball park of great. Also, turned out she had her period and started bleeding on me after a few pumps! Of course, that's neither here nor there.

I went to see another girl (Dianna 161 Chatswood) based on a review who everyone was shitting on for being probably fake/shill and she had pretty good tits, quite good. I'd recommend seeing once if you're a tits person.

Anyway, if I could plead with you, my fellow punters. Could you please be more objective with your descriptions, especially of the girls bodies?

Not sure if I should say the name of the girl with the not-great tits. If enough people request then I will.

[RodgHerMoore]

I hear you. I have turned up for a girl on the back of good AR's but had dud punts. Looks are subjective, but the AR's I've responded to imho the punter had beer goggles (both 41 Epping).

The other thing to think of - and I'm guilty of it too - but where there's a good AR but your experience is different, just contribute on the same thread so there is balance and perspective. I did just that today.

Regarding service - the old adage is ymmv. The girls are human and not all will click with you same as you may not click with them/other ppl in general.

[Sibon]

Probably pissing into the wind a bit here, but I need to rant. I'm probably also part of the problem..

It frustrates me that you read some reviews and the descriptions are overly generous. I'm somewhat reluctant to critcise the opinions of fellow punters though, especially when I don't write reviews as often.. I do chime in with my opinions though lol.

When I say some, I suspect it's a substantial percentage. I don't know exactly but seems to have happened to me a few times.

I went to see a girl today based on her supposedly having 'great tits'. The tits were slightly below 'meh' I would say and her body overall was not great. Not even approaching great, or even in the ball park of great. Also, turned out she had her period and started bleeding on me after a few pumps! Of course, that's neither here nor there.

I went to see another girl (Dianna 161 Chatswood) based on a review who everyone was shitting on for being probably fake/shill and she had pretty good tits, quite good. I'd recommend seeing once if you're a tits person.

Anyway, if I could plead with you, my fellow punters. Could you please be more objective with your descriptions, especially of the girls bodies?

Not sure if I should say the name of the girl with the not-great tits. If enough people request then I will.

You should write another honest AR against the same girl.

[manjuice333]

I hear you. I have turned up for a girl on the back of good AR's but had dud punts. Looks are subjective, but the AR's I've responded to imho the punter had beer goggles (both 41 Epping).

The other thing to think of - and I'm guilty of it too - but where there's a good AR but your experience is different, just contribute on the same thread so there is balance and perspective. I did just that today.

Regarding service - the old adage is ymmv. The girls are human and not all will click with you same as you may not click with them/other ppl in general.

I did that with Dianna, I probably would have done with this one too but I don't want to now that I've made an issue of it hahaha. I will try to in the future though.

I understand service and chemistry will definitely vary but here I'm thinking specifically of the appearance, only. I think with body shape it's less subjective than say is her face pretty or not.

Probably another can of worms there lol.

[personaa]

I have learnt to trust reviews of only 2 members in here. The rest have different standards of beauty and x-factor and quite a few IMHO are paid promotions for particular shops (This is just my opinion, I am not going to mention which shop and not getting into an Q&A with anyone here on this matter). But I completely understand your frustration with some reviews.

[steelfreddy2]

Sometimes, folks can be a tad generous when they're scribblin' down their thoughts on somethin'. Could be they're feelin' in a good mood or they just don't wanna ruffle any feathers, you know what I mean?

[Hidden Python]

On a personal note we are all different and have a different perspective.
At 52 a girl that looks like a 10, but might only be a 2 in a young 20 year old studs eyes,
But when it comes to service a starfish is a starfish

[The Sampler]

I like following up ARs where i can with my own personal experience and yeah its definitely YMMV territory.
Also i think its a local area thing too.

A good example is the private WL/ML Yuki@Town Hall. I would say 75% of her thread in the private section trashes on her looks, but for a westy like me she looks way better than some of the ladies out my way for the same price.
But in the CBD all the young hotties are here so she's on the lower end of the looks spectrum to the local punters here is my understanding.

[Sibon]

But when it comes to service a starfish is a starfish

To a Python a starfish is a starfish.

But to a cat a starfish is a great lick.

[11Bravo]

Perhaps if you've only seen 2 racks, that 3rd one looks pretty good. But if you've seen 200 racks, the next one might be a bit more discernable.

Plus, think human nature (RIP Trink) to want to validate your own decisions unless they've gone totally off the rails. Like personaa, a few member's reviews I'll take at face value. Everything else is YMMV. But I do respect ALL who at least write reviews. Seems to be a lot of new crud around in the threads, that from those who think that AR is "And Repeat" their unending questions, their 1 liner inane comments, never an After Report to be seen.

[Axeman123]

Perhaps if you've only seen 2 racks, that 3rd one looks pretty good. But if you've seen 200 racks, the next one might be a bit more discernable.

Plus, think human nature (RIP Trink) to want to validate your own decisions unless they've gone totally off the rails. Like personaa, a few member's reviews I'll take at face value. Everything else is YMMV. But I do respect ALL who at least write reviews. Seems to be a lot of new crud around in the threads, that from those who think that AR is "And Repeat" their unending questions, their 1 liner inane comments, never an After Report to be seen. Hey! That's me. I'm one of those......

[MrPB]

I believe that writing a purely objective AR would be difficult, especially without an agreed framework suggesting or indicating a punter on what to look out and write about. This could also mean that the reviews start getting homogenised and we the readers lose the uniqueness and individuality of each review.

Whilst I do agree that more detail or description could be used in the AR, that is if someone is attracted to a girl because of her "great tits", I would love to know what makes those tits great.

I did however see a comment on an AR mentioning that some ARs are similar to an erotic novel, whilst I do agree to some extent, I believe the story and the report addresses what we (or at least me) may expect should we spend some time with a girl.

[M0rfl1ng]

You should write another honest AR against the same girl.

I think this is the way to go. I recently had the same experience, not as good as all the previous AR - so I posted a counter AR to give another perspective

[ditchtheboss]

Looks are subjective, I don’t think ARs should be used to evaluate looks but service I stead. Just my opinion

[M0rfl1ng]

Looks are subjective, I don’t think ARs should be used to evaluate looks but service I stead. Just my opinion

True - but looks are an important factor too. If a granny gave amazing service, would you be keen?

[ditchtheboss]

True - but looks are an important factor too. If a granny gave amazing service, would you be keen?

Good point but you are referring to age. Asian granny’s will look in their 40s to me but knowing their age is helpful

[Ghost2hauntU]

On a personal note we are all different and have a different perspective.
At 52 a girl that looks like a 10, but might only be a 2 in a young 20 year old studs eyes,
But when it comes to service a starfish is a starfish

I’ve had some of my best fucking with starfishes. But I’m a punter who prefers to service submissive WLs. In fact, those that are service oriented often put me off.

[GoldfishMan]

I’ve had some of my best fucking with starfishes. But I’m a punter who prefers to service submissive WLs. In fact, those that are service oriented often put me off.

My man, high five bro...

[GoldfishMan]

Looks are subjective, I don’t think ARs should be used to evaluate looks but service I stead. Just my opinion

This may be true, but there are ways we can avoid the problem of subjectiveness.

I personally try to write my ARs with as little "fluff" as possible. Do away with all the superlative adjectives like great, good, awesome, magnificent, etc. I generally never try to write about the face of the WL, but if I did find a girl exceptionally pretty I'd try to describe it somehow, like heart shaped face, sexy eyes, etc.

Instead, I provide more specific descriptions of what that part looks like, and maybe add that I like that look at the end.

I also try to make my own personal tastes known so people would know where I'm coming from. I like leggy girls, so I mention that in most of my more recent reviews.

Things like that can be done to make an AR more effective in conveying the right message regardless of personal taste.

[GoldfishMan]

On a side note, my personal fave writer on here gotta be bro BigDipper. Mainly because our tastes are similar, but he's also quite precise in his assessments.

[Abracadabra]

It's sort of like evaluating reviews in other areas of life, except here we can track various reviewers likes and preferences as well as their feedback style. Trouble is it takes some time and a bit of hit and miss before you identify just who is similar to yourself.
Like GFishman I can relate to 2 or 3 forum reviewers

[l337dude]

I’ve had some of my best fucking with starfishes. But I’m a punter who prefers to service submissive WLs. In fact, those that are service oriented often put me off.

Fucking A, submissive and accommodating WLs = some of the best fucks.

With regard to ARs I always look at them with a grain of salt, not to say they are all fake (some of them definitely are), but many of them may be very subjective, I'm particular wary of the "super positive" ARs, there are particular things I look for in an AR, if it's there great if not no big deal, there are still a lot of good objective ARs here.

Then theres the folks who ONLY write positive ARs, a few of them here, I usually don't pay much attention to those ones, not saying they are all BS at least they are contributing ARs, just not for me, other people may find those useful.

[blueplanet]

I personally can’t stand long-winded fap material reviews and don’t find them useful at all. What I would prefer to see is a Menulog/ Booking.com style star rating system against certain criteria, could be something simple like:

1) Accuracy of photos
2) Services provided
3) General attitude and demeanour
4) Overall value for money

Addresses the most common questions usually asked and makes it easier to compare girls. Most of all though, more engagement from users without the time or inclination to write reviews but happy to spend 30 seconds clicking a few buttons (me being one of them). A bigger critical mass of feedback overcomes the bias of a few individuals posting the majority of reviews.

[M0rfl1ng]

This may be true, but there are ways we can avoid the problem of subjectiveness.

I personally try to write my ARs with as little "fluff" as possible. Do away with all the superlative adjectives like great, good, awesome, magnificent, etc. I generally never try to write about the face of the WL, but if I did find a girl exceptionally pretty I'd try to describe it somehow, like heart shaped face, sexy eyes, etc.

Instead, I provide more specific descriptions of what that part looks like, and maybe add that I like that look at the end.

I also try to make my own personal tastes known so people would know where I'm coming from. I like leggy girls, so I mention that in most of my more recent reviews.

Things like that can be done to make an AR more effective in conveying the right message regardless of personal taste.


Sometimes hard to be objective in such a specific experience. I guess over time, once you've had enough massage - you start to notice the small things objectively

[wachumba]

You do realise some people get benefits from the shop for writing reviews?

[personaa]

You do realise some people get benefits from the shop for writing reviews?

Absolutely. I think this is mainly true for some high end and predominanly Asian shops (280-350 per hour).

[wachumba]

Absolutely. I think this is mainly true for some high end and predominanly Asian shops (280-350 per hour).

It is applicable to any shop, even the lower end massage shops reviewed here.

[Axeman123]

You do realise some people get benefits from the shop for writing reviews? Do the shops bring, call in a reviewer or does reviewer offer his services ?

[17012430]

Do the shops bring, call in a reviewer or does reviewer offer his services ?

You’ll usually get treated a lot better by mamasans if you tell them you’ll write a review about your session (a good one) and that girl you reviewed ends up getting a bunch of bookings. You’ll probably be one of the first to know when a new girl starts or get better recommendations when making bookings too.

[personaa]

If they had referral system based on commission then writing reviews would have become a career! A particular review on our forum has been read 67,000 times (Most reviews are between 500 to 5000, dependibg on shop) , even if 10 percent make a booking, this would come to 1,950,000 AUD cash flow to the shop (@300 per hour). A commission of 10 percent means almost 200k for the lucky guy who wrote that glamorous review!!!

Shops do know how a good review can entice people to book a girl or make a visit. They will do anything for it.

[jaquedm1307]

You’ll usually get treated a lot better by mamasans if you tell them you’ll write a review about your session (a good one) and that girl you reviewed ends up getting a bunch of bookings. You’ll probably be one of the first to know when a new girl starts or get better recommendations when making bookings too.

You'll usually ......
Could one deduce this is your line of work hence your multitude of ARs ????

[personaa]

Well, it's a choice anyways.

[17012430]

You'll usually ......
Could one deduce this is your line of work hence your multitude of ARs ????

Lol if I could make money from reviews I'd be at the shops daily.

[l337dude]

It's a punting forum, what did you guys expect lol, surely there will be some paid/affiliated reviews and lots of marketing, it's business afterall, why so surprised? There are still a lot of good ARs here though so can't complain.

[GoldfishMan]

What makes you think that the "writers" even fuck the girls they're writing about? If it's a paid service, I'd say they go the whole hog. Not even a session is had, all of it could be fake.

Disclaimer: I'm not alleging that there are actually "writers", merely suggesting that your perception of what a "writer" might be or what they might be doing, could be a bit off the mark. IF they did exist, that is.

[tezzaman18]

I can see using this approach provides objectivity and can't be seen to be overly biased . It's bound to happen that if a WL fancies you , the experience will differ.


This may be true, but there are ways we can avoid the problem of subjectiveness.

I personally try to write my ARs with as little "fluff" as possible. Do away with all the superlative adjectives like great, good, awesome, magnificent, etc. I generally never try to write about the face of the WL, but if I did find a girl exceptionally pretty I'd try to describe it somehow, like heart shaped face, sexy eyes, etc.

Instead, I provide more specific descriptions of what that part looks like, and maybe add that I like that look at the end.

I also try to make my own personal tastes known so people would know where I'm coming from. I like leggy girls, so I mention that in most of my more recent reviews.

Things like that can be done to make an AR more effective in conveying the right message regardless of personal taste.

[dvu420]

Depends on perspective and standards I guess.

[17012430]

The best girls never get written about either…

[l337dude]

The best girls never get written about either…

Or the best shops...just kidding =P