Why there's open racism in brothels

[puntingparadise]

I see some whops openly advertise "No Indian", "No Korean" etc., .. No Indian is most common .. why? are they rough?.. demand more? isn't it not depend on the individuals? .. we can't really say a particular race is bad overall.

[mn69]

This isn't racism. The girls have a right not to see Indian or to only see Asian if that is their wishes

Welcome to Australia. If you force a girl. Its criminal charges & jail time for you

If you don't like if, the airport if very closeby

Again happy punting bro's

God Bless Freedom & Democracy
God Bless Australia
God Bless the United States of America !!

[Axeman123]

Looking over Ginza's roster, Dior looks like she'll service the " unchosen" ones. What more could a new migrant ask for.

[Zimmermann]

I see some whops openly advertise "No Indian", "No Korean" etc., .. No Indian is most common .. why? are they rough?.. demand more? isn't it not depend on the individuals? .. we can't really say a particular race is bad overall.
No Korean mainly requested by Korean girls.
If you are Korean just ignore the Korean girls

[FreddyF]

Newly arrived Indians don’t know about deodorant and may stink. They also don’t know much about social etiquette and may treat the girl disrespectfully.

[FreddyF]

If it’s any consolation, at GE, T Darin, K Rebecca and V Dior will see anyone. Money is money to them and they’re all highly experienced girls. There’s not much more a newly arrived Indian will need that those girls can’t offer.

[personaa]

Here we go again. You can't force yourself into another 'human being' just because you have cash. We are not talking about consumable commodities, we are dealing with humans.. They have this fundamental right to decide who they are going to service.

I understand this may make people feel uncomfortable, move on . Plenty of fish. Or look at it this way, they see you and they offer you a rubbish service and you are ripped off. I think should be thankful that they are helping you save money.

As a caucasisn I can't see the girls who are Asisn only and it doesn't bother me the slightest.

[rooter]

This has been raised many times before and here is a summary of what the vast majority of Forum members have said each time.
It is the girl's choice who she has sex with. End of story.
Whatever basis she decides on is irrelevant. A girl, whether she is a WL or not, always has a choice who she has sex with.
Providing a sexual service is not the same as providing a cup of coffee or a hamburger.
The girls right to choose who she has sex with has to be respected.
If some have a blanket ban on Indians then thats it, no Indians. Find a different girl.
There is almost universal and unanimous agreement on this on the Forum.

[MrPB]

To echo what everyone has mentioned already, and to hopefully use this thread as an example for future threads.

The services the girls provide is intrinsically intimate.

They are very vulnerable and so I completely understand that they have requests to protect themselves, their identity or their mental/physical health.

I'm sure they are already providing services to many men who they would not even blink an eye out on the streets, so much respect to the work their work.

I don't think too much of it, and like many have said, there are other girls out there. Failing that, I would suggest trying a bar or a dating app.

[Nelly69]

Build a bridge and get over mate, its the girls choice.

[jandross45]

My previous boss years ago tried to enter a pub in the city, he was specifically told that "islanders, specifically maoris were not allowed", they further elaborated that the establishment can refuse service to who ever they like for whatever reason. This was during the time smartphones were getting big and you could discretly record interactions.

Long story short: the venue were given a civil litigation lawsuit after and their insurer had to pay out a large sum of money under the racial discrimination act.

Further, a WL can refuse service to whomever she likes: preferably discretely. However, if they advertise somewhere that their venue will refuse service base on race.... well, you will get what is coming.

[mn69]

My previous boss years ago tried to enter a pub in the city, he was specifically told that "islanders, specifically maoris were not allowed", they further elaborated that the establishment can refuse service to who ever they like for whatever reason. This was during the time smartphones were getting big and you could discretly record interactions.

Long story short: the venue were given a civil litigation lawsuit after and their insurer had to pay out a large sum of money under the racial discrimination act.

Further, a WL can refuse service to whomever she likes: preferably discretely. However, if they advertise somewhere that their venue will refuse service base on race.... well, you will get what is coming.


Its not the venue that is refusing Indians. Its the individual girls. You can freely walk into the shops if you want.

Yes you can go make a discrimination case out of it, put your name & face out there. And explain to the Australian Courts with Female judges and Female panel how offended you are that another woman refuses to have sex with your Indian Ass.

As I said before. Welcome to Australia where we have women's rights

God Bless Freedom & Democracy
God Bless Australia.
God Bless the United States of America

If you don't like it.
The airport is just a short drive away.

[softdrink.pp]

My previous boss years ago tried to enter a pub in the city, he was specifically told that "islanders, specifically maoris were not allowed", they further elaborated that the establishment can refuse service to who ever they like for whatever reason. This was during the time smartphones were getting big and you could discretly record interactions.

Long story short: the venue were given a civil litigation lawsuit after and their insurer had to pay out a large sum of money under the racial discrimination act.

Further, a WL can refuse service to whomever she likes: preferably discretely. However, if they advertise somewhere that their venue will refuse service base on race.... well, you will get what is coming.

Good point. It is not the establishment that is refusing service. Everyone is welcomed. It is the individual girl's choice. I don't think there's any shop advertising x, y or z nationalities/races are not welcomed.

[tcrawford]

I've noticed at Ginza/Empire girls always start with no restrictions, then on day 2 they switch to Asian only. There must be some caucs that are on the VIP list that are breaking them in. Interestingly enough these guys don't get black listed, so it must be some kind of initiation.

[stallionmachine123]

To be honest this isn’t a professional services industry.

Just like we want to see a lineup these girls have a right to see include or exclude certain ethnicities.

[jandross45]

Brothel owner cross-examination:

Plaintiff: so your venue refuses service based on race?

BO: No, then individual girls have a preference and they can refuse service to whom ever they like.

Plantiff: but you advertise this on your website and you manage the website , not the WL is that correct?

BO: that is correct.

Plaintiff: so your business is refusing service based on race?

BO: ....errrrrr....ummm......ME NO SPEAK ENGLISH

Plaintiff: and the business model stipulates that you receive a cut of the money from the service provided by the WL and yourself that refuses service based on race.

BO: *looks at defence lawyer*, *starts crying* ME NO SPEAKA ENGLISH.

Magistrate: *look on his/her face that is tired of the bs* ....yea, I'm awarding this matter in favour of the plantiff

[11Bravo]

Brothel owner cross-examination:

Plaintiff: so your venue refuses service based on race?

BO: No, then individual girls have a preference and they can refuse service to whom ever they like.

Plantiff: but you advertise this on your website and you manage the website , not the WL is that correct?

BO: that is correct.

Plaintiff: so your business is refusing service based on race?

BO: ....errrrrr....ummm......ME NO SPEAK ENGLISH

Plaintiff: and the business model stipulates that you receive a cut of the money from the service provided by the WL and yourself that refuses service based on race.

BO: *looks at defence lawyer*, *starts crying* ME NO SPEAKA ENGLISH.

Magistrate: *look on his/her face that is tired of the bs* ....yea, I'm awarding this matter in favour of the plantiff

Except if you bother to read the boilerplate, it does state that the brothel only charges for the room. ALL services provided are up to the individual provider.

Magistrate: Case dismissed. Litigation costs and damages awarded to the defendant. Further, plaintiff's lawyer sanctioned for wasting this court's time. Gravel bang.

[jandross45]

Appeal:

Plantiff: but your website that you manage clearly states that your serviced are only provided based on race.

Boomertron: idk, I'm kinda a moron only called as a witness because I simp for lowlife hookers.

[11Bravo]

Supreme Court: Clear for the literate that any racial prohibitions are up to the provider; the website is just stating those prohibitions. Original verdict for defendant confirmed. Plaintiff's attorney disbarred for wasting the court's time, plus condemned to a life sentence of pinheadedness.

[jandross45]

Supreme wouldn't take this matter it's not a corporation with millions nor would the brothel be able to afford it, they would rather pay out the amount sued for.