🇰🇷🇵🇭🇭🇰- Susie, Kimi, Natasha in one week!

[woods23]

Short review for . My way to celebrate Christmas break.

Susie- Easy my favorite out of the three .She looks better than ever , tall, younger , more slim , more elegant.
Part 1 is very relaxing with her soft massage, followed by her k style b2b/ cbj = $100 very good price for a beauty like her. Some light dirty talk too. If she like you she can be quite sweet and friendly.( I had seen her total of 4 times..but she can only remember the last two times. haha ) :grimace: she's my Candy atm.

Kimi- she's actually half Cambodian/Philippines..look more Cambodiam to me. Massage is very good, I really enjoy it. She's petite, abit cuvry with a large boob. Offer b2b/ cbj. I option for some nice b2b = $80. B2b is very good also. She a Very friendly girl. Not that open tho. Ymmv.

Natasha- she speak Cantonese, so conversation flow naturally in room. She is a good talker if you let her she can talk all day. Massage is good. Offer B2b/cbj. I went for B2b =$80 . With clothes on she don't look that good..but once naked..what a surprise, petite, light tan, cuvry body, B cup nicely shaped. Skin is tight a gym body. Nice ass too. Doesn't look like a Chinese body at all.. A Clean looking pussy in 69. ( I'd love to be inside her) Extras, it seems is reserved for her regulars or the one she like. A very out going person .

[mindboggler]

Thanks for the multi-review! Succinct and informative.

Although I have to say, this just confirms that beauty is truly in the eyes of the beholder. I have seen Susie a couple of years ago and she was certainly getting on in age. Was comfortably in her 30s then, and I am not exaggerating in any manner.

Also went in to see Natasha recently because her photo and description looked too alluring. In reality she looks nothing like the photo makes her out to be. Not a slim, young babe. Petite is also not a word I would ever use for her. And no way she is in her 20s either. But again, this is just what my eyes tell me.

Who is definitely in their 20s? Emi (she must now be 25ish… has been advertised as 19 for at least the last 4 years since her CBD Style days, but she does look young). Hana probably late 20s but not the best looker in my opinion. A couple of the other J girls who are genuinely early 20s. Then there are a couple of Korean dragons who are easily in their 50s. I have forgotten their names. Shops always advertise ages falsely… but to pitch a 40s lady as 20 is laughable

[blanet]

Also went in to see Natasha recently because her photo and description looked too alluring. In reality she looks nothing like the photo makes her out to be. Not a slim, young babe. Petite is also not a word I would ever use for her. And no way she is in her 20s either. But again, this is just what my eyes tell me.

Age might not be accurate but she looks damn close to her photos and looks just as attractive. She might have put on a tiny bit of weight during the festive season but who doesnÂ’t? Your assessment of the girls makes it sound like you have exceedingly high beauty standards that few shops would be able to meet.

[mindboggler]

Possibly, however I do see dozens of girls on the train or walking down the street every day that I think are very very pretty. So I’m not sure my standards are unrealistically high.

I do have a problem when shops paint a picture that is so far from reality. Natasha doesn’t have a young, chiselled, 20s frame. She is short, stout and very average to look at (IMO). The photo showing a portion of the face with lips and chin certainly paints a much more flattering image.

Not disagreeing or debating for the sake of it… just musing that these things are definitely eyes of the beholder. We see the same girl and have polar opposite impressions.

[MrPB]

Thanks for the review and the intel about Kimi.

Unsure why the shop would falsely put her ethnicity as Vietnamese, unless it was a genuine error.

[PervySage]

I am not one to defend ML or disagree with a punter since it’s all YMMV, however Natasha was a great punt for me seen her few times. She isn’t tiny or petite but isn’t chubby, she is as they say “thick” build, and great personality.

Had few sessions with her and was definitely a good punt each time, the intensity of our sessions left both of us sweating, maybe just the aircon 🤣

[woods23]

Mr Boggler. Fair enough we all have different taste in girl.

As for Susie- yes she not as young, but she aged Gracefully..abit more sweeter, looking better and better.

Maybe I should used the word " short not petite " but when shes naked on the table , moving around , Pussy facing me and sitting on my cock..she does look fcking hot, mate!!

As for age and photos etc. How many time have you been fooled? 1 ? 2. 3? Don't be silly to believe all that. 99% shops all.ahops write incorrect description of the girls. So i don't why you get so upset about?
We know the Big Mc at Mcdonald don't look that ...get over it!

[mindboggler]

Well said mate. Well said!

[tommyb]

I was going to write a AR for natasha to kinda mention the same thing about her body but i see its already been discussed here.

definitely thicker than advertised, with most of the girls ive seen there its seems fairly accurate photo wise (emi, noa, yuna, sara, and a blonde thai girl i forgot her name!) so was kinda surprised that natashas photos weren't as accurate or saying size 6. id say her body is more curvy like megans photo (but shorter).

Lovely girl lovely service and body and nice hair and make up (i went full service) but more just a FYI if you prefer skinny girls she's prob not for you. I've seen her a few times already

I am tempted to try susie, seems to be some mixed reviews on here (or good ones from 3 years ago). looks like her extras are a bit steeper so will have to bring some extra cash

[MrPB]

I was going to write a AR for natasha to kinda mention the same thing about her body but i see its already been discussed here.

definitely thicker than advertised, with most of the girls ive seen there its seems fairly accurate photo wise (emi, noa, yuna, sara, and a blonde thai girl i forgot her name!) so was kinda surprised that natashas photos weren't as accurate or saying size 6. id say her body is more curvy like megans photo (but shorter).

Lovely girl lovely service and body and nice hair and make up (i went full service) but more just a FYI if you prefer skinny girls she's prob not for you. I've seen her a few times already

I am tempted to try susie, seems to be some mixed reviews on here (or good ones from 3 years ago). looks like her extras are a bit steeper so will have to bring some extra cash

Let us know how you go with Susie - there hasn't been a recent date review on her and how she presents these days

[41eppingmassage]

41 Epping Massage
WeChat ID: newtwinklestar41
Address: Level 1, 41 Beecroft Road, Epping NSW 2121
Phone :0493498228


Experience ultimate relaxation and rejuvenation at 41 Epping Massage today!



CHECK OUT TODAY'S ROSTER


NATASHA - HONGKONG

https://i.ibb.co/CKHg45JL/Natasha.jpg (https://ibb.co/PG6KJZTk)


* view more photos and details on wechat moment
*please add our new wechat ID

Best girls in inner west ❤️
(Parking: Rawson Street - 2-hour free council car park)

We offer various massages like remedial, relaxation, full body oil, double, and couple massages. Our skilled masseuses from Japan, Korea, China, Taiwan, Thailand, and other countries ensure quality service for your tight muscles and personal relaxation needs.


https://i.ibb.co/4nnwg7ZK/41-Massage-New-Pricelist.png (https://ibb.co/Mxxy5sDZ)

41 Epping Massage
WeChat ID: newtwinklestar41
Address: Level 1, 41 Beecroft Road, Epping NSW 2121
Phone :0493498228