Sagami 0.01/0.02 Large vs Okamoto 0.01/0.02 Large – for girthier guys who want closest to BBFS

[AussieBill]

Hey gents,

I’m looking to buy a big batch of condoms (35–40) and after some real‑world advice. I’ve been doing my research and narrowed it down to two options:

- Sagami 0.01 and 0.02 Large (polyurethane, 0.01mm, nominal width around 58–60mm)
- Okamoto 0.01 Large and 0.02 Large (0.02mm, 60mm width)

I’m above average girth (about 5.7″ mid‑shaft, a touch over 6″ at the base) so standard rubbers are a no‑go. I want something that feels as close to bareback as possible, absolute minimal loss of sensation. I’ve heard some guys say the 0.02’s actually feel better because the material stretches a bit differently and gives a more natural sensation. Others swear by the 0.01’s for sheer thinness.

So for those who’ve tried both on a thicker tool, which one felt closest to going raw? Did you have issues with breakage or the base rolling up? Any advice on lube compatibility?

I’m planning to buy a bulk lot so I’d rather not waste money on the wrong box. Cheers for any help.

[asheton]

It's been a while but I seem to remember both brands being ridiculously small, the Okamoto more so. I had to end up going with the Sagami Original XL at 0.024mm.

[AussieBill]

The joys of being well endowed I guess haha ��. I was hoping to go for the 0.01 sagamis as mentally I could tell myself it's basically bareback at that thickness. How were the sagami XL? Did they fit well? Particularly I'm after as thin as possible but not if it's going to be too small and constrictive. At this point I might need the 0.02 xl. What girth are you if you don't mind me asking? I'll try to remeasure my girth again tonight but last I checked 5.7-6 inches in girth depending where I'm measuring. So the L could be a tight fit especially if that's a Japanese L. Damn the ML girl is gonna go wide eyed! Hehe. Also was that the sagami/Okamoto 0.01 regular or was it the L models they have currently?