qualitysteven
15-06-2013, 06:12 PM
If you look at some photos and read an AR equivalent in length to “War and Peace” by Tolstoy, you will no doubt come to a certain view. But to assume an AR is accurate simply because of its inordinate length and the inclusion of a few pictures, well this is simply the domain of gullible innocents. “Assumption is the mother of all screw ups” gentlemen, remember that. Assume nothing, seeing is believing.
I doubt whether any body of sound mind would bother themselves to write copious pages of ARs, they would only do so based on their own vested interests, one way or another. I put it to you that, in fact, the briefer ARs are probably as accurate as those positively dripping with all the so-called imperative statistics.
In any event, think of the difference between recorded music and live music, big difference right? It is absolutely the same with people. A brief “live” visit to any shop will answer all your questions better than any AR ever could. You will see whether the lady has had a busy day or late night, or if she might have a cold, or she is a little “bloated” on the day, or has some other malady. Do you want for your massage a menstrual bloated babe, with a cold, after a late night? You won’t get that information from any AR, I assure you.
On the other hand, on visiting any establishment, you might well see ladies with a sparkle in their eye, with obvious positive outlook and healthy vibe, with a beautiful foxy smile, and with an engaging personality, etc, etc. Again you won’t get that from any AR, it’s too dependent on your interaction with them and on your personal interpretation. In this regard, all ARs fall badly short, all too often raising entirely unrealistic expectations. It would seem to me that some individuals, and groups of individuals, are “guilty” of this, both in a pre-meditated and even co-ordinated manner, the latter being something of a concern. The question is whether or not the game-players are “independents” or part of larger more organised “collectives”, with ulterior motivations.
In any event, to focus the angst and hostility on one establishment, to the apparent exclusion of others, clearly suggests that “feathers have been ruffled” in certain places, and there is another “not so hidden agenda” at play here. “A blind man can see that”. Gents, you are living in dreamland if you think there is a level playing field in this cyber-sphere. I recognise that, and I’m prepared to live with it, with my humour intact, regardless of whether I like it or not. In conclusion, I have not criticised any establishment on the forum, nor will I, because that is not the behaviour of an intelligent and honourable man. Unfortunately, in that regard, I see there are many others willing to take my place.
Regards,
Steven
I doubt whether any body of sound mind would bother themselves to write copious pages of ARs, they would only do so based on their own vested interests, one way or another. I put it to you that, in fact, the briefer ARs are probably as accurate as those positively dripping with all the so-called imperative statistics.
In any event, think of the difference between recorded music and live music, big difference right? It is absolutely the same with people. A brief “live” visit to any shop will answer all your questions better than any AR ever could. You will see whether the lady has had a busy day or late night, or if she might have a cold, or she is a little “bloated” on the day, or has some other malady. Do you want for your massage a menstrual bloated babe, with a cold, after a late night? You won’t get that information from any AR, I assure you.
On the other hand, on visiting any establishment, you might well see ladies with a sparkle in their eye, with obvious positive outlook and healthy vibe, with a beautiful foxy smile, and with an engaging personality, etc, etc. Again you won’t get that from any AR, it’s too dependent on your interaction with them and on your personal interpretation. In this regard, all ARs fall badly short, all too often raising entirely unrealistic expectations. It would seem to me that some individuals, and groups of individuals, are “guilty” of this, both in a pre-meditated and even co-ordinated manner, the latter being something of a concern. The question is whether or not the game-players are “independents” or part of larger more organised “collectives”, with ulterior motivations.
In any event, to focus the angst and hostility on one establishment, to the apparent exclusion of others, clearly suggests that “feathers have been ruffled” in certain places, and there is another “not so hidden agenda” at play here. “A blind man can see that”. Gents, you are living in dreamland if you think there is a level playing field in this cyber-sphere. I recognise that, and I’m prepared to live with it, with my humour intact, regardless of whether I like it or not. In conclusion, I have not criticised any establishment on the forum, nor will I, because that is not the behaviour of an intelligent and honourable man. Unfortunately, in that regard, I see there are many others willing to take my place.
Regards,
Steven