Are all 533 Willoughby WLs milfs?

[ShuRin]

I've had a few very exciting trips to 533.

However just curious if they are all milfs as I have not seen any WLs who are genuinely in their 20s.

No complaints though - every trip had been satisfying.

[Raybo]

Nothing under 30, maybe Ricci on the current roster.... and the general consensus is that most of them are over 40.

[serge_nubret]

I've seen Priscilla, and I'd clock her around late 20's to early 30's.

Also saw Chloe recently. Same deal, late 20's to early 30's.

In fact, I'll get off my arse and put up some reviews.

[Raybo]

I see Jan regularly, at first i thought mid 30's........celebrated her 46th birthday in May if i did the maths right!!!

[serge_nubret]

Pretty sure Angie has a cryogenic lab for some of the ladies.

[Alan86]

I've seen Priscilla, and I'd clock her around late 20's to early 30's.

Also saw Chloe recently. Same deal, late 20's to early 30's.

In fact, I'll get off my arse and put up some reviews.

RED FLAG SPOTTED!

Consensus here is the women are 40+,

yet Serge is describing them to be as young as 'late 20s!!'

Can someone please vouch for these women, Priscilla and Chloe, as around this age?

Otherwise we cannot trust Serge, as he may be affiliated to the shop, or otherwise unable to estimate WLs age range.


PS - if they are in fact that age, and can be vouched for, then I sincerely apologise to Serge.

[CunningLinguist]

Most are 40 or 50, I have seen one in her late 20's a long time back, but she was quite plump. Have not been for years though so things may have changed...

[serge_nubret]

RED FLAG SPOTTED!

Consensus here is the women are 40+,

yet Serge is describing them to be as young as 'late 20s!!'

Can someone please vouch for these women, Priscilla and Chloe, as around this age?

Otherwise we cannot trust Serge, as he may be affiliated to the shop, or otherwise unable to estimate WLs age range.


PS - if they are in fact that age, and can be vouched for, then I sincerely apologise to Serge.

Lol, ease up turbo. Obviously you're still salty because I said I wasnt particularly digging your creepy dialogue with Babycat in another forum.

Regardless, I'll take the bait and retort:

1- I said they're around (note the usage of the word 'AROUND') late 20's to early 30's. That's a pretty vague guesstimate I don't think any punter would take as dogma. As other bros have said, some of these girls look mid 30's and are pushing 50. There are plenty of old ducks at 533, but the two I saw I reckon are around that age range. The rest are in their 40's at least.

2 - Using this account (maybe I used to post a lot of other reviews under frank_zane, maybe not) I've posted one review for 533 and I gave a 5 out of 10. Hardly glowing and if I am affiliated I'm doing a pretty bad job of it.

3 - Not sure who you are to call into question my credibility. You've posted precisely zero reviews, but flood every thread with gibberish and start nonsensical threads about jerking off during legit massages and ladyboys.

4 - Earlier today you called another member a "...prick" just because he asked you to keep the thread on track and had less posts than you, which really showed your true colours. Now this second vindictive attack against myself just adds brush strokes. Ugly picture that's forming here bro.

But, as you said, if they are of that age then you apologise, and I accept your apology and wish you well 😉

[Alan86]

Lol, ease up turbo. Obviously you're still salty because I said I wasnt particularly digging your creepy dialogue with Babycat in another forum.

Regardless, I'll take the bait and retort:

1- I said they're around (note the usage of the word 'AROUND') late 20's to early 30's. That's a pretty vague guesstimate I don't think any punter would take as dogma. As other bros have said, some of these girls look mid 30's and are pushing 50. There are plenty of old ducks at 533, but the two I saw I reckon are around that age range. The rest are in their 40's at least.

2 - Using this account (maybe I used to post a lot of other reviews under frank_zane, maybe not) I've posted one review for 533 and I gave a 5 out of 10. Hardly glowing and if I am affiliated I'm doing a pretty bad job of it.

3 - Not sure who you are to call into question my credibility. You've posted precisely zero reviews, but flood every thread with gibberish and start nonsensical threads about jerking off during legit massages and ladyboys.

4 - Earlier today you called another member a "...prick" just because he asked you to keep the thread on track and had less posts than you, which really showed your true colours. Now this second vindictive attack against myself just adds brush strokes. Ugly picture that's forming here bro.

But, as you said, if they are of that age then you apologise, and I accept your apology and wish you well 

True, I do think you're a bit of a prick aswell.

But now I think you are also dodgy because you seem to be bumping into girls who 'around 30', when the shop seems to have women who are 'around 40 or more'!

This may be just your good luck, in which case I do apologise, and take back my accusation. If someone can vouch for it.

Otherwise I know I for one, won't be following your reviews! Or at least add 10 years to what you say.

There's nothing worse than going to see a girl who you thought was 'around 30', only to discover is actually 'around 45' when you turn up!

And sorry, you admit to using multiple accounts under different names? Do I really need to argue my case here?

PS- Most of the time on here, I have tried to answer the OPs question seriously and to the best of my ability. If I've been fooling around lately, I think I've earned the right to have a bit of a laugh here and there.

I don't post ARs as I have questions regarding it, but I do recommend girls and it pisses me off that people don't appreciate my effort, like that prick who had about 50 posts, when I have about 500 genuine ones where I genuinely tried to contribute here!

Also

- My contributions to this forum greatly exceed yours. Not just talking about Number of posts, but otherwise.

- If my convo with Babycat was in fact 'creepy', then why was she participating in it? Obviously, we were just having a laugh.

- Most of the threads I start are successful. I also do have some strange and unique threads This is so that I can add new things to the site that have not been done before. But you wouldn't be able to understand this concept.

- To give one example, a newbie asked how to enter shops undetected. I responded with a step by step guide for newbies to follow. How can you say I talk rubbish and don't answer the OPs question?

It's a shame to meet people like you.

[serge_nubret]

True, I do think you're a bit of a prick aswell.

But now I think you are also dodgy because you seem to be bumping into girls who 'around 30', when the shop seems to have women who are 'around 40 or more'!

This may be just your good luck, in which case I do apologise, and take back my accusation. If someone can vouch for it.

Otherwise I know I for one, won't be following your reviews! Or at least add 10 years to what you say.

There's nothing worse than going to see a girl who you thought was 'around 30', only to discover is actually 'around 45' when you turn up!


PS- Most of the time on here, I have tried to answer the OPs question seriously and to the best of my ability. If I've been fooling around lately, I think I've earned the right to have a bit of a laugh here and there.

I don't post ARs as I have questions regarding it, but I do recommend girls and it pisses me off that people don't appreciate my effort, like that prick who had about 50 posts, when I have about 500 genuine ones where I genuinely tried to contribute here!

Maybe you haven't cottoned on yet, but I don't really care if you think I'm a ".....prick" or "....dodgy". You have yet to provide a solid contribution to this forum, and multiple members have told you already to stop spamming. You provide no reviews, don't seem to visit FS shops, and probably haven't even been to 533, so who cares what you think on the subject?

Moving forward though, the solution to your problem is simple: don't follow my reviews, and if you are interested in seeing a girl I've reviewed just chuck on 10 years.

And lastly, in regards to the poster you called a "....prick" simply because he had less posts than you, just remember the golden rule son: quality, not quantity.

Now jog on.

[serge_nubret]

RED FLAG SPOTTED!

Consensus here is the women are 40+,

yet Serge is describing them to be as young as 'late 20s!!'

Can someone please vouch for these women, Priscilla and Chloe, as around this age?

Otherwise we cannot trust Serge, as he may be affiliated to the shop, or otherwise unable to estimate WLs age range.


PS - if they are in fact that age, and can be vouched for, then I sincerely apologise to Serge.

So Chloe's age range has been confirmed by another punter in the after report section. Would you like me to ask someone to confirm Priscilla's age range too or are you satisfied? If so, you can apologise any time you want. I mean, you still log in daily, so I'm sure you're lurking.

[BigBoy]

Serge & Alan, you both need to get a room and take out your sexual frustration...

[Fred69]

So Chloe's age range has been confirmed by another punter in the after report section. Would you like me to ask someone to confirm Priscilla's age range too or are you satisfied? If so, you can apologise any time you want. I mean, you still log in daily, so I'm sure you're lurking.

Serge, whilst I agree with you in some aspects of this "debate", I didn't "confirm" Chloe's age range, I just stated my estimate of her age. What I said was...

"I, like most westerners, find Asian girls look much younger than their true age (that's one of their attractions).

I gave my opinion that Chloe was in her mid-20s - I might be right or I might be wrong, it's just my honest estimate based on what I saw, just as I might guess a WL's dress size and the size of her tits.

As I wrote in my review of my previous visit to 533 (Baby - 4/8/16) "Age : Somewhere between 25 and 40 - I can't tell (in any case, she's at least 20 years younger than me and it doesn't matter to me what her actual age is, it's how she looks and what she does that's important.)"


Maybe others are better at estimating their ages than we are. But does it really matter? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder - if I'm happy to spend an hour in the company of a WL who's actually 45 years old but looks (to my judgement) 30 and provides great service, her year of birth is irrelevant.

It's a matter of opinion - time for all of us to move on.

[serge_nubret]

Serge & Alan, you both need to get a room and take out your sexual frustration...

I was the only one who rocked up to our date. He stood me up.


But does it really matter? Beauty is in the eye of the beholder - if I'm happy to spend an hour in the company of a WL who's actually 45 years old but looks (to my judgement) 30 and provides great service, her year of birth is irrelevant.

It's a matter of opinion - time for all of us to move on.

Fair call Fred. I agree with you, age doesn't matter, and normally I wouldn't give a rats about his comments. Personally, in the price range we're discussing, I'm not fussed how old the lady is as long as she provides good service. But basically I got proper sick of him carrying on, calling out and swearing at other punters and have taken this opportunity to tear strips. I've let my anger, and possible deep seeded and unrequited man love for said punter get the best of me. Apologies for taking your words out of context.

[Uptight]

All Milfs but you get what u pay for :grimace:

[GoldfishMan]

Some of them are even GILFs. Can you spot them?

[Uptight]

Some of them are even GILFs. Can you spot them?

Forgot about the Gilfs very easily spotted