Longan
07-05-2017, 09:55 PM
The three possible remuneration structures I can think of are:
1) $x per hour at the shop
2) $x per hour working with client
3) Combination of 1 and 2, so $y per hour at shop plus $z per hour working with client.
Method 2 incentivises WL to perform better since the better they perform, the more clients they attract, which is good from the shop's perspective. As far as I'm aware, this seems to be the standard way WL's get paid in the industry.
However, one of the key concerns for WL is stability of income. No one wants to stick around at a shop for 8 hours and go home with nothing because it was simply a slow day or it was raining and no customers could be bothered venturing out to a brothel. So was wondering if shops consider Method 3 to compensate WL's for this situation and give them a safety net.
1) $x per hour at the shop
2) $x per hour working with client
3) Combination of 1 and 2, so $y per hour at shop plus $z per hour working with client.
Method 2 incentivises WL to perform better since the better they perform, the more clients they attract, which is good from the shop's perspective. As far as I'm aware, this seems to be the standard way WL's get paid in the industry.
However, one of the key concerns for WL is stability of income. No one wants to stick around at a shop for 8 hours and go home with nothing because it was simply a slow day or it was raining and no customers could be bothered venturing out to a brothel. So was wondering if shops consider Method 3 to compensate WL's for this situation and give them a safety net.