Printable View
https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/...lsgj.html?btis
The 16 year old scammers probably got off with only juvey and no conviction.
For all we know, this guy could've been white knighting thinking he could try to get the "girl" out of the "business".
So what if he's got condoms on him, right? ... Maybe he should've been "prepared" to BB the 15 yo instead? FFS...
Moral of the story: never try to white knight when sex is involved. Dating sites, sugaring sites, whatever. It's all the same.
He aint getting any pity from me. He was happy to put he's dick into a 15 year old girl, let that be a lesson for him.
A man of he's age should have more control of he's sexual urges. Thats what brothels are for.
https://archive.md/tw2VQQuote:
Originally Posted by Xen
or copy link in
https://12ft.io/
What 15 yo girl? There was none. He was being scammed by a couple of 16 yo dudes. And this wasn't a police sting either.Quote:
Originally Posted by Misohappy
I also do not understand what the point the judge was trying to make about the condoms. Does that mean we shouldn't be carrying condoms in case it could be used against us as incriminating evidence? That's ridiculous IMO.
The point is that the thought there was a 15 year old girl. And what 66 year old carries condoms AND lube when going to meet a 15 year old girl? And it’s irrelevant whether it was a police sting or not.Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldfishMan
It’s all pretty obvious.
Sure, he may have intended to be ‘her’ white knight … after he fucked ‘her’. Dude doesn’t agree to meet a (hypothetical) young girl who makes it clear she wants sex in a fucking hotel room just to convince her she’s doing the wrong thing. The condoms and lube were just icing on the cake for the prosecution.
Yaa white knighting and all that bullshit. Take his ass to jail.
[QUOTE=GoldfishMan;3417626]What 15 yo girl? There was none. He was being scammed by a couple of 16 yo dudes. And this wasn't a police sting either.
I also do not understand what the point the judge was trying to make about the condoms. Does that mean we shouldn't be carrying condoms in case it could be used against us as incriminating evidence? That's ridiculous