Tossing up to visit Mika, Momo or Rami.
They all seem to be fairly safe bets based on what I'm reading?
Any insights further insights on the girls would be appreciated.
Printable View
Tossing up to visit Mika, Momo or Rami.
They all seem to be fairly safe bets based on what I'm reading?
Any insights further insights on the girls would be appreciated.
Mika I’ve only seen once and not recently, others might be able to advise better. She’s the only one of the three you mentioned who does Diamond, therefore fs is guaranteed if that’s what you’re after ( not a sure thing with new customers with the Nuru girls).
Momo is the Nuru queen, great body, great personality, great service. Can be hard to book sometimes though.
Rami is petite, very nice body, friendly. Good Nuru technique, but I still find she has a tendency to want to finish early and get you out the door ahead of time if you don’t make an effort to slow things down. Not rushed as such, just tends to finish early. Probably the only girl at these shops I’ve experienced that with. Otherwise no complaints. She has some small tattoos if that’s an issue.
Saya’s last day today apparently.
Have you guys been declined FS from a nuru girl? I've recently come across this place recently and all the nuru girls offer or mention they do FS on my 1st visit, although their FS doesn't come with alot of extras that the diamond girls provide and they seem to be a bit more submissive and get you to lead. This is my experience though and YMMV.
99% of Nuru J girls will eventually do sex, at any shop. Sometimes they come brand new to the industry and don't offer it in the first week or two but they always convert to doing FS. I think it's Japanese mentality to create that clear distinction that its just work.
Yeah, definitely agree with this. The only time I’ve ever really been declined fs is when I’ve seen a new Nuru girl in her first week, then the situation (and offer) usually changes later on.
I think some of the girls at this shop will go ‘Nuru’ rather than diamond service so they can refuse certain acts (typically bbbj and/or cim) or reserve the right to refuse certain type of customers. Depending on the girl, if you’re too ugly/fat/old/rough/big/small or in some cases a certain ethnicity you’ll get refused fs, if you fall into her acceptability criteria you’ll have no problem.
Their body descriptions are close enough I reckon. But yeah cup size is the only one that seems to be on a different scale. Adding to this, I also find prettiness a good gauge here. When there's a pretty or very pretty in the profile, the girl is usually fairly attractive. For age, not all the girls have it on their profile, but maybe a good thing. I never had milfy surprise there. Some other shops really go wild with their age accuracy.
Yeah, where an age is listed, probably add around 1-3 years (as opposed to +10 years at some shops). Most of the j girls are in their 20s up to early 30s (occasionally one of the short stay / FIFO girls seems to be a genuine 18 or 19 year old). Some of the K and C girls skew a little older but usually similar range.
Went to Mystic today - saw Mocha for a 45min Nuru session. Shes very new to this, but it wasn't horrible. Shes cute. Natural D's.
My planned punt fell through the other day, so I decided to TOFTT and see Ari.
The Good: I found Ari to be friendly, good attitude, quirky sense of humour, her English was easy to understand (though I think she had some trouble understanding mine) and her service was very good (Diamond Service). Good BBBJ, there was DFK, enthusiastic sex in a variety of positions, and good CIM finish.
The Bad: She looks NOTHING like her photos. Not the slightest resemblance that I could see. If the photos are actually her, they are so heavily filtered and photo shopped that they might as well be a different girl. Ari is not terrible looking, but in real life she is somewhat chubby and with more ordinary facial features. Not bad as such (except for the bait and switch aspect) but nothing special. Description of height, cup size and weight are probably not far off (maybe weight is understated a bit). Decent tits with dark nipples, shaved smooth or lasered below.
The Different: One thing that led Ari to stand out is how noisy she was during sex. Really loud, bordering on screaming at times, in that way that you can't really tell whether she's really into it or she's in pain. I stopped and checked in with her a number of times and got a thumbs up or an 'all good', so I guess it was pleasure - or feigned pleasure at least - but it was really hard to tell at times. Could be a turn on or turn off depending on personal preference.
Woods, based on the looks of ladies you've mentioned you like seeing from Mirage, I suspect Ari would not be your type.
Community Service - my impression of which of the girls rostered this week at Mirage and Platinum resemble their photos:
Bianca - no photo
Chase - genuine photos, close resemblance
Haruka - genuine photos but they're two years old. I haven't seen her for a while, but last time I did, hair and skin were both darker than in her photos, otherwise body shape was pretty right.
Maria - genuine photos, close resemblance
May - don't know, I haven't seen her
Rami - genuine photos, accurate but don't show much
Risa - genuine photos, close resemblance except her tattoos have been edited out or strategically avoided
Sarah - genuine photos, close resemblance
Saya - genuine photos, close resemblance
Suzu - genuine photo but doesn't show much. Tattoos have been strategically avoided
Sweetly - genuine photo but heavily filtered. The hair is right! She is a pretty girl and actually does have large eyes, but her face shape is different (and her eyes obviously not that big).
Ako - genuine photos, reasonable resemblance (I think the photos are about a year old)
Ari - fake or extremely altered photos, no resemblance
Beni - genuine photos, pretty close resemblance except she has blonde hair now, not pink (the selfie is the most accurate)
Michelle - fake photo (as stated) although it does somewhat resemble her
Zoe - genuine photos, the ones in the beige underwear are a close resemblance
Aya - I think genuine photos, reasonable resemblance
Kaori - genuine photos, it's been a while since I've seen her but I think the resemblance is close
Mia - genuine photo, doesn't show much but reasonably accurate
Momo - genuine photos, close resemblance
Kiko - genuine photos, reasonable resemblance
Mika - genuine photos, reasonable resemblance from what I remember
Miko - genuine photos, close resemblance
Hana - a bit hard to tell but I think the photo is genuine and accurate, but doesn't show much
Rinka - genuine photos (at least the ones taken in the shop are), it's been a while since I've seen her but fairly accurate at that time (the photos are at least 1.5 years out of date)
Izumi - not sure - have only seen her in passing, but look reasonably accurate.