Circumised vs uncut at late age

Circumcision generally leads to reduced glans (head) sensitivity, but the difference is not as big as people make out to be, but its definitely there, especially when cumming e.g. more likely to experience too intense of an orgasm and can't move ya dick. More so if the guy never masturbated much, the first few times he will be sensitive as fuck. The foreskin always covers your glans which prevents it from being exposed (contact with clothes etc), more moist..etc

The downside with being uncut is you need to make sure to clean it properly, I know WLs who are not a big fan of BBBJ an uncut penis, I mean there's nothing wrong with it if you keep it clean and have good hyenine, but some guys don't lol, also the foreskin can become problematic for some guys if can't retract it properly causing problems for sex.

Everyone is entitled to an opinion. Doesn’t matter whether he is in the medical profession, fancies ladyboys or anything else!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jamit

In my 50s I've found it harder to maintain an erection and I'm not able to cum 10 times a day like I used to in my 20s. Not sure if that is abnormal and due to my cut cock.

---

It's normal. It just means you're getting older. When you get into your 60s like me you'll probably find that you cum once and then need a full day to recover before you're really ready to go again.
I too remember those halcyon days in my 20s when I could spend a night "sleeping" with a girl and cum every hour. Sigh.

Circumcision is pretty boring bro. Get a forked tongue instead

I did it in my late 20s best decision I ever made. No loss in sensitivity sex is better than ever. Whoever said girls like uncircumcised dicks is kidding themselves girls hate it. Cleaner no doubt about it.