At the time of a transaction the coins have a given value. After that whatever happens is the responsibility of the escort.
Use this link bro. Copy and paste this link: https://www.removepaywall.com/
Then copy and paste OP's SMH link. I'm reading it right now and it works.
This is exactly how I see it.
A girl once told me that she had a booking and the boss told her diamond service as she was heading towards the room, or at least she said she heard the boss say diamond. The customer had only paid for nuru massage and so when she entered the room she confirmed with customer that it was diamond. Of course the customer being a lowlife and seeing the opportunity said yes and they proceeded to do diamond service.
At the end of her shift she got paid and was short of what she was expecting and worked out that the first customer only paid for nuru. The boss denied she said diamond and didn't reimburse the girl and so the girl provided FS at no extra charge. Was the customer obligated to be honest? I guess this would be considered non-consensual if they are debating this.
Open smh.com.au in chrome. Hit F12, within chrome Dev tools select network request blocking and add domain "*.piano.io" reload page ad free.
Women are generally okay to share a top 1% wealthy man with other women as long as she is taken care of.
Its been like this since the beginning of time. Even Kings, Emperors & Shoguns had harems of women
Only the average man is socially expected to just have one woman & stick with one woman.
Here is his LinkedIn profile https://www.linkedin.com/in/marksarian/
In legal terms, it is rape if a man gets a sexual service and then refuses to pay for it.
New expression in law, called “fraudulent inducement”, protects sex workers from clients who deceitfully promise money but then hand over an empty envelope or a dud cheque.
Calling it now his wife is asian. This guy is gunna come out of prison with no wife and no career all because he didn't want to pay to get pissed on.
He's about to get all the free sex he can handle in the SuperMax.
Consent being contingent on payment could open up a massive can of worms imo
Hayne married his wife in 2021.
The alleged 'rape' occurred in 2018, well before he married (as did the other case in the US).
If she believes him to be innocent then she is simply supporting her partner and not 'wanting to lose money' is likely not at play given the figures it has been said to have cost him to date (legal costs etc).