Printable View
Don’t know if you’ve come across them before, private girl group was operating out of that block of apartments at 361 Sussex St. They’re a well known bait n switch operator, never used real photos. Be warned.Quote:
Originally Posted by Angry Penguin
Luckily she told you. I bet there are many that won't warn customers of positive results.Quote:
Originally Posted by syd_azn_guy
Hello again lads,
I do not have much intel about privates but a possible joint to avoid would be the CK King Massage ran by Maria.
Please do not take me wrong. And YMMV. I think she is struggling with the business after the Covid drama. The photos are slightly photoshoped.
There I go and Maria tells me that a very busty Chinese gal will be waiting for me. Yes, alright. I go for a 30 minutes walk around the Meadowbank walking trail. And the time for the moment of truth comes.
I am waiting outside and noticed a punter maybe in his mid 60s comes out of the shop. I don't care about that.
I go through the backdoor. The lady at first impression looks 'alright'. White silky skin. Then, the true colours of everyone involved surface as no other. 'Sorry darling 45 dlls for the massage'... The massage was very below basics. Yes, I admit the gal had a white silky skin. Then, for the Part 2, she removes her clothing but those juggs I was craving for were nothing but a pure illusion.
CK King Massage needs to improve. I would stick to the standard joints. Again, YMMV.
Thank you folks. Again, I am new to the After Report thing but I have been long in the game. I hope my experiences and wisdom contribute to this valuable forum.
I second this, 235 Homebush road is bait and switchQuote:
Originally Posted by jfoldbar
curiosity got the better of me about one of the many ads associated with 361 sussex, so had to check for myself.Quote:
Originally Posted by jfoldbar
it is definitely shit. the ad shows a hot young slim body. and a chubby milf answers the door trying to say its her in the pics. im so glad the top brain won out then, cause i walked.
heres another address to "mayby" avoid.
209 castlereigh st
however, if its milf you are after, the chick that answered the door is not a bad milf. i walked because the ad was a lie, but for a second i considered staying to see her cause shes still quite doable for her age.
i didnt see her naked but i reckon this chick is a fairly close match, but perhaps tits are 1 size smaller.
https://www.xvideos.com/video5449510..._are_locked_up...
this is the ad for her. https://secrethostess.com/6028/
the pics are bullshit. she is not korean. she said singpore. but she is an ok slim milf.
□ Is the girls name completely different to the account name that it was posted under?
□ Do the photos look suspicious: photoshopped, augmented, too good to be true?
□ Are there multiple different ads using the same account, descriptions and photos?
□ Is the ad written in broken English?
□ Does it read like it was written by a horny 14 year old boy?
□ Has the phone number been used on multiple accounts?
□ Did the girl give you her exact address almost immediately after texting?
□ Are her photos unverified?
□ Did you find her ad on a free public listing escorts directory?
If you answer yes to 2 or more of those. You are almost certainly getting a bait and switch.
Agree with most of these not the broken English one though. I almost exclusively punt Asian WLs, so the broken English is to be expected. I’m more dubious of the ones that are written in perfect English unless she’s an Australian born Asian.Quote:
Originally Posted by vitrium
Another thing to look out for is photos that clearly show the girl’s face. It doesn’t mean she wants you to see her pretty face, it means that’s not her face so she doesn't mind showing it.
i went there fully expecting the photo to be incorrect, and expecting to walk.Quote:
Originally Posted by syd_azn_guy
she had long hair. height was mayby around 165. however i dont recal what, if any, shoes she was wearing.
Slightly disagreed with the first statement. I’ve seen few Asian girls do better in writing than Aussie.Quote:
Originally Posted by GoldfishMan
Totally agreed with the second one. Probably they steal those photos from different media resources, or basically pay the girls living in their countries to take those photos.
278-284 Sussex St . Bait switch . They are probably same as 361 Sussex
161 Clarence st
355 Kent st
same agency . Made mistake once .
Though met an interesting late 20’s -30’s woman, who then later introduced me directly,,to some of her friends .
They charge absurd rates, and aside from the woman I first met are likely going to be 40 plus plus Chinese women, you’d not choose in a budget shop
Chatswood.
38 Anderson St, not sure the unit number.
I was directed here, and knocked on door and they wouldn't show their face.
Turned out to be a guy who want the money and then send me into the girl's room.
I asked to see girl and he said pay money...
I just simply left.
This was late last year (2021 Dec), but I just saw the advert again which reminded me.
101 best road seven hills. Two old maybe in their 60s. ladies. One of them is chubby
Greek st Glebe( appartments next to shopping centre) was not a hot South American instead a old ugly Asian lady or something NO FUKIN WAY!!!
In those apartments you never know what can be hidden and filming you.Quote:
Originally Posted by syd_azn_guy
Catfished!! Let loose a few words of disgust and took my money elsewhere
thanks for sharing this. hopefully we get more of this posts to weed out the bad ones.
35 - 45 Waring St Marsfield
Actual street number = 39
https://www.escortsandbabes.com.au/P...ndent/alisa23/
definite bait and switch. Unless the picture is at least 10 years ago.
short time, overcharge, eyes on wechat (phone) nearly all the time... waste of $$.
7 Cowper St. Granville - disgusting
Tried a few times:
1. this place is so run-down and dirty,
2. the WLs usually cut your time short, say you paid for one hour, they try to finish it in 35-40 minutes,
3. always advertised 4 young WLs, in fact only one or two 40y+ women available. Even if you wait more than an hour, you are guaranteed will not seen the advertised young girls.
how about 115 bathurst street?
Was just told about a heap of advertising (Locanto, E&B) in "Penshurst". the address used is 556 Forest Road Penshurst.
All are Bait & Switch - Beware !!
Can confirm 361 Sussex st from bad experience.
These wretched places never seem to shut down, there is always a fresh sucker i suppose like myself.
Really not 100% sure... veriu Hotel/Apartments in Randwick.
operator. Kaysee.http://escortmatch.com.au/escort/lovelykaysee/
line id: lovely.kaysee
Wants you to book upfront by send $$ to her agent.. suggest you stay away.
Did you walk away?Quote:
Originally Posted by luv2liqqq
306/90-94 Wentworth Rd Strathfield another Chinese Milf infested burrow. Avoid.