Amen and well saidQuote:
Originally Posted by NathanA
Printable View
Amen and well saidQuote:
Originally Posted by NathanA
I find there's a good teasing massage and there's going through the motions. Most of it seems to be going through the motions.Quote:
Originally Posted by Massage hunter
[QUOTE=BrisbaneSwede;2908187Most of it seems to be going through the motions.[/QUOTE]
This. The rubbing of my left calf muscle for 5 minutes doesn't do it for me. I know you're using your other hand to answer texts.
Sent from my SM-S901E using Tapatalk
My thing is a good hard massage preferably from a middle aged thai or asian woman. And when there is a connection that way then teasing does help. But if the massage is not good, teasing doesn't help.Quote:
Originally Posted by BrisbaneSwede
$200-$300 for 30 min booking. 4-6 bookings a day.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bed Wrecker
$1200-$1800per day to open your legs. Yes it's a big pay cheque
Who is paying that for 30 mins? I only pay that for an hour.Quote:
Originally Posted by nosha
If you are time starved, offer much less or wear the 30 min shop fee
Do you think you could take it up the arse or suck dick like they do for the same money in their circumstances?
What about servicing 60-70 year old women all day?
Its got to be a grind seeing the quality of men going into the shops, especially mentally.
I mean I am sure you are an adonis, but fuuck, thats got to screw you up way past a relatively small pay cheque.
Happy new year people.
I think this discussion is a bit pointless, I have reviewed Sugar, if the op read my review he would have just do nhj and not ask for fs, she don't like people touch her down there. As every girl needs to be respected. With the manager Krystal, she wouldn't give a shit about someone not respecting the girls. Sometime they get it wrong and employed a non preforming staff but then we should not see these staff then they will move on. Our money is the voting right. I welcome bad reviews so we can use our right. I have done my share of reviews, do what a forum function does, if you don't want to share you gems, share the bad ones so we can avoid.
As with going to the cops. Good luck. Lately there were only two cases, one was Sky day spa who anger Asian Star with punching their staff. Another was UMI at Rocklea who anger The Viper Room down the road. The cops and PLA read this forums, don't you think they know what they do in the shops? They don't do anything is because no harm is done. As the ML is trying to make a living. I just hope all the owner reading this please pay the staff more on the cut, should be half of what you charged for the shop fees. So they can invest more time in massage.
Have fun this year.
$150 for bbbj cim isn’t too much. Fucking boomers in this thread. Just like the housing crisis don’t understand that prices change and so does the price of sucking dick.
Would gladly pay this if she lays on her back while receiving the cumshot and swallows it. Very good valueQuote:
Originally Posted by dave.j8811
150 is fair tbh but is it still 150 with the girls at tik Tok. last time I took my friend there he was charged 250 for full service instead of 200. that led me to believe there is an increase in price for every tier of services provided.Quote:
Originally Posted by dave.j8811
they will charge you anything you are willing to pay.
if your friend had refused, she would have reduced the price for him. but now, because of him, she is going to start quoting other people 250 and hope that they don't refuse her.
Of course there's an increase in price for every tier.
But these shops are negotiable. Far more negotiable than parlours etc.
The girls rely on that cash you give them so if they've had a quiet day or week they become far more eager to try push the extra pineapple and then talk down a bit.
Standard practice is just try your luck subtracting a pine, south American girls you'll need to subtract probably 2 or 3 to get to the real price.
I figure the cops have got higher priorities than raiding shops.Quote:
Originally Posted by maxa
But is it true that if a complaint is made by whoever (member of the public, neighbours, another business in the area) then the cops have to act on it? Maybe not a full on raid but possibly a visit to see that they are doing something about the complaint?
I hope Sky Day Spa dont punch their stuff.Quote:
Originally Posted by maxa
Ive heard of shops doing much worse though
Anyway, a correction of why Sky Day Spa in Eight Mile Plains was raided and shut for months.
Next door is a childcare centre. A complaint was raised by parent(s) of seedy looking men entering and leaving.
Police sent an undercover to talk to patrons as they left.
One stupid young guy was caught putting a used condom in the bin and questioned. He admit fucking the woman inside.
Bang.
This was the original point of the post... Fuck the cartel, don't pay their extra pine for services. It's got nothing to do with being a boomer. Which I am not. It's about not getting fucked in the assQuote:
Originally Posted by exflux
I think he meant "pinching" their staff from another shopQuote:
Originally Posted by Scotty from Marketing
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquaman
I think generally, if a brothel reports on a massage shop providing sexual services, the cops MUST investigate. it is not fair to the brothel, as they pay licence fees but the massage shops don't.
but if a member of the public reports, it depends on how the reporting was done. if it is just accusations, the cops might take their time to do the investigating. but if you say that you went for a legit massage, and the girl offered extras, like FS or BJ, and you paid but never got the service, in which case you got CHEATED, then the cops must investigate. if you have to report, be smart. never say you asked for the service or if the service is offered. cos if you did, then you propositioned, which is illegal. but if she offered, then she is the one who propositioned, and that is where she made the mistake.
The cops dont have to do shit.Quote:
Originally Posted by carlco777
This isnt fantasy world.
They know the amount of time, paperwork and effort that goes into a prosecution like this and the end result is a $500 fine.
Thats not a good use of police resources.
If they get pressure from up on high, be it senior police, media pressure or politicians then we will know for sure.
As it is, the cases that have been prosecuted over the last few years are needle in the haystack stuff. The most likely outcome is a girl being deported (not that many) or warned off working in massage shops (a much bigger number)
Owners can always say they didnt know what their girls were doing once the doors were closed. They put up signs saying no sexual services allowed etc
As for brothels, they wield no power. Sucks to follow the rules i guess.
Ask taxi drivers how their license fees are following uber etc entering the market.
Police arent going to treat some guy getting done $200 by a hooker like it requires the full force of the law.
Small claims court goes up to 20k or something.
The amount of online fraud or people being cheated left right and centre by all kinds of legit businesses, your $200 dont mean shit.
They dont have the resources to investigate every little petty crime.
i'm not sure if you are trying to convince others or yourself.
i remember the days at New Farm where undercover cops posed as hookers. a lot of people got done and taken to court. most of them got slapped with a $200 fine and a record of no conviction. what did the police get out of all this ? still, they did it, and the operation went on. but people still think the police don't got the resources for such things. i can only say, believe what you want, when the day comes, "should have, would have, could have" boils down to nothing.
They have the resources for it when it's politically charged.
Eg heaps of complaints or an issue that's popped up.
Given the desperation they have at the moment in recruiting (year 10s are being plucked from school) and the youth crime issues. Noone gives 2 fucks about a rub and tug or some idiot getting fleeced for a pineapple.
When did undercover cops pose as Hookers in New Farm?Quote:
Originally Posted by Navigator
Under Joh? A liberal government?
When it was politically convenient to do so?
Police have resources to prosecute jaywalking if it comes from up high. Political or Bureaucratic.
The average cop does what he is told and they arent gonna worry about some hand shandys from an asian whore.
If people smuggling becomes a political issue, and its not likely, too much cheap labour, then maybe theres a few shops dancing awfully close to the line.
Police generally announce sting operations as a warning. They generally leave punters alone. Its the shops or girls who should be shitting themself. Still its needle in a haystack stuff.
Or you can sit and think the sky is falling and hide in your basement until there’s world peace. Good luck
Mainly 2001 thru 2009.. but occasionally from 2009-2016.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fungus the Bogeyman
When did undercover cops pose as Hookers in Kangaroo Point?
Defo in the period 2009-2016. They had a dwelling in Bromley or Toohey street about 100m from Ipswich road, where they would co-ordinate their entrapments in Kangaroo Point
Wasnt that street walking though? Loads of problems with street walking on both sides.Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Grafton Everest
I got no problem with removing that part of the industry unless you can do some kind of amsterdam style system
And in addition to all that, they would probably find quite a few of their colleagues as customers if they started to bust shops on a large scale...Quote:
Originally Posted by Fungus the Bogeyman
Like the famous Los Vegas mobster Moe Dalitz said when question about his history of illegal gambling joints,
"there were so many judges and politicians in my joints I thought it must have been allowed"