Shit. My bad lol.
Open smh.com.au in chrome. Hit F12, within chrome Dev tools select network request blocking and add domain "*.piano.io" reload page ad free.
Women are generally okay to share a top 1% wealthy man with other women as long as she is taken care of.
Its been like this since the beginning of time. Even Kings, Emperors & Shoguns had harems of women
Only the average man is socially expected to just have one woman & stick with one woman.
Here is his LinkedIn profile https://www.linkedin.com/in/marksarian/
In legal terms, it is rape if a man gets a sexual service and then refuses to pay for it.
New expression in law, called “fraudulent inducement”, protects sex workers from clients who deceitfully promise money but then hand over an empty envelope or a dud cheque.
Calling it now his wife is asian. This guy is gunna come out of prison with no wife and no career all because he didn't want to pay to get pissed on.
He's about to get all the free sex he can handle in the SuperMax.
Consent being contingent on payment could open up a massive can of worms imo
Hayne married his wife in 2021.
The alleged 'rape' occurred in 2018, well before he married (as did the other case in the US).
If she believes him to be innocent then she is simply supporting her partner and not 'wanting to lose money' is likely not at play given the figures it has been said to have cost him to date (legal costs etc).
Should have used afterpay
According to the article, this matter is of significant public interest. His company, Babylon, and his career are in serious jeopardy. All his friends, family, and business associates (LinkedIn) will want to distance themselves from him. What was he thinking? He should have sought advice. The consequences of paying with a bounced cheque will come back to bite him hard. He might have a low IQ or be suffering from something else.
It may be a mitigating element, but you would think that consent would be the overriding factor and she can withdraw that at any time.
The brothel/paid sex transactional basis could and likely would cloud the issue but the basic principles of consent would apply once the circumstances are unravelled...
Yes, consent can be rescinded at anytime except, in my opinion, after the fact. I mean, surely there must be a limit to everything, right?
This proof of payment thing I reckon is solid proof. At least to a certain degree, it'll help. It sure beats only having your words against her words when it comes down to it.