Speaking the truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary actQuote:
Originally Posted by pmmeyourknee_
'All Indians stink like shit!'
Printable View
Speaking the truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary actQuote:
Originally Posted by pmmeyourknee_
'All Indians stink like shit!'
There's nothing wrong with the post. Someone would have to be truly delusional to take offence. Don't worry broQuote:
Originally Posted by pmmeyourknee_
At mirage there was a customer that came downstairs he was a fat and really hairy indian guy with a stench that trailed and his clothes were dirty with heaps of stains. When I walked upstairs I saw momo leave her room and felt so sorry for her. He was like 3 times her size...Quote:
Originally Posted by Double_Adapter
0_0 brutal lol.
If only we actually had free speech in Australia.Quote:
Originally Posted by pmmeyourknee_
"What is the greatest threat to Australian democracy?
It might be hiding in plain sight.
It is broadly understood and accepted among legal experts that Australia's defamation laws are the most imbalanced in the free world, with even international human rights groups raising concerns about how they're used to suppress free speech.
Defamation laws are designed to stop the publication of lies that could damage someone's reputation (fair enough). But under Australian law, any reporting that could even infer wrongdoing is grounds for expensive litigation, and defamation lawyers have set some extraordinary precedents to place the threshold incredibly low for what constitutes an "imputation."
The plaintiff need not prove any malice or even that any harm was done by the reporting — yet payouts are designed to bankrupt journalists. The only defence is to prove the truth of what the plaintiff claims was inferred, which generally requires millions of dollars in legal fees.
These laws are constructed this way by the richest people in this country to entrench their power and shield themselves from criticism. And no one is even talking about addressing it.
Think about this: in Australia, no one can publicly accuse someone in power of corruption, sexual assault, or any improper behaviour... unless they have the resources to prove it in court.
The reality is, almost none of us have the money, time, or mental capacity to defend ourselves in a defamation case... so we self-censor, even if we're confident we're telling the truth.
This fundamentally restricts the ability to challenge power in this country and enables the wealthy to control public access to the truth.
I experienced this first-hand after pointing out that a person associated with a well-known politician was making a gesture that was identical to a white extremist symbol.
Importantly, I did not say he was a white extremist — but I thought my followers deserved to see it for themselves so they could make up their own minds.
I had lawyers serve papers at my door demanding I pay tens of thousands in damages, as well as delete the image from my page.
I sought the advice of two of the most prominent defamation lawyers in Australia, who both told me to delete the posts immediately and beg for forgiveness. They assured me I had little hope of defending myself in court.
My principles outmuscled my senses and I flat-out refused, daring this person to test their claims in court — knowing full well I couldn’t afford a single day of proceedings.
The more I researched, the more I realised I would have to somehow raise millions to launch a legal defence — and I knew my opponent had millions more. I was risking the financial ruin of my family for the right to share the truth. In the end, the risk was too great.
I eventually negotiated. Three stressful months after receiving my first legal notice, I agreed to delete the post if they promised to drop all legal proceedings and not sue me. They accepted.
This happens every day in Australia.
No major story gets published in our media unless the lawyers have cleared it. This forces journalists to knowingly withhold the truth from us. How many “open secrets” have journalists been obliged to never publish? How many explosive revelations are being withheld from the Australian public right now?
The mere threat of an expensive defamation case is usually enough to keep uncomfortable news stories off the front page.
And while News Corp and Channel Nine can afford to spend millions on legal teams, the situation for independent journalists, content creators, and social media commentators like myself is substantially more tenuous.
We all know that at any moment, a wealthy person could choose to financially strangle us in the civil courts... and the “truth” will largely depend on who has the best lawyers.
I know Michael West receives regular defamation threats from the wealthiest people in the country desperate to silence his reporting.
Even Australia’s most popular political social media influencer, Jordan Shanks (Friendlyjordies), despite having the support of millions of followers and free legal counsel, was forced to pay former NSW Deputy Premier John Barilaro $100,000 for insinuating he was corrupt in a YouTube video.
Angus Taylor has used defamation threats to make multiple Twitter users delete posts that raised concerns about his involvement in a controversial water buyback deal.
Former Attorney-General Christian Porter sued ABC journalist Louise Milligan for reporting on credible rape allegations against him — even though her reporting didn’t name him.
Peter Dutton, while Defence Minister, sued an immigration activist for calling him a “rape apologist” in a tweet — a phrase the activist used in response to a news story where Dutton claimed some refugee rape victims were lying.
The simple reality is this: in Australia, if you accuse someone in power of impropriety, you’d better be prepared to risk losing your house over it. Because if your lawyers don’t win, you lose everything — and the powerful always have deeper pockets and better lawyers.
Until these laws are rebalanced, the Australian public will never be fully informed about what those in power are up to. We rely on our media to be free and fearless for our democracy to function. Right now, it is neither.
It takes incredible courage to publish any negative news about a powerful person in this country — even for editors and journalists backed by million-dollar companies. That should not be the case. The truth should be enough to stand on.
Journalists must be protected for good-faith reporting on matters of public interest — because right now, they are scared.
I am strongly urging the state governments of Australia to urgently review our defamation laws and bring them into line with those of our democratic allies.
These laws are a stain on our democracy." Carrick Ryan (ex-federal anti terrorism police officer).
So basically everyone agrees that reviews are useful for finding out who the best actors are but they all hate your guts and can't wait for it to be over.
Or is it, they definitely come with me but all you other dudes are dreaming?
I for one would like to see more examples. Zhangwao says they all say this on twitter, I don't know how much that's an exaggeration because I didn't even know any of them would be posting so publicly about their SW!
I think that there is a whole spectrum of tastes and likes, so there might be WLs that enjoy punters especially the ones that look like Richard Gere or Chris Hemsworth. So everything is possible and the YMMV BS card is still valid
Keep it coming mate! This is funny shit and free speech here!Quote:
Originally Posted by pmmeyourknee_
Sent from my SM-S911B using Tapatalk
Thanks everyone, I'm glad most of you like it. Good to know we are all grown ups here!Quote:
Originally Posted by jedibear
I've got funnier/spicier ones I will post later when I have time.
Yeah Japanese use Twitter/X as their main social media. Sadly I can only share what's public. If there is anyone out there willing to do the deed, please do. I don't think there's anything wrong with it. We review them, they also write ARs about us! Seems even to me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Loblaw
It's interesting to see what's hidden behind the shy, polite, and submissive mask that many Japanese girls wear. At the end of the day, humans are still humans. The more they suppress their feelings, the more rage builds up. It's almost funny how it all gets unleashed on a public platform!
This is a fantastic thread. I posted the other thread asking why we punt in a way as a response to what the girls are posting that we are desperate and only punt because we have to pay for sex. It is quickly emerging that that is not the case as I suspected.
I didn’t post as a response as I don’t think they will read, just for us to understand. I am curious about. I think the combination of this thread and the others gives us interesting and entertaining content.
I think it is ok to post here what is shared in public. I would discourage posting anything that has been shared I private.
Keep in mind the nuance. Life experience has taught me that nothing anyone says is substantive especially not from an online opinion platform. She could just be venting over a particularly bad day or she's just venting about one particular person. You ppl need to keep in mind fundamentally none of this changes anything. People are not discernible through the face value of an online opinion.Quote:
Originally Posted by pmmeyourknee_
The latter of course mate, lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by HiredGoon
That’s a good point Linq. Certainly one persons (or even many persons) opinion does not equate to the shared opinion of an entire group. And people posting their opinions online are catering to an audience and curating their opinions thusly. Or as you say, venting about a particular situation and generalising in the process.Quote:
Originally Posted by Linq
I do though appreciate the democratic notion (going back to free speech) that if we can review the WLs, so too can they review us. I’m sure many of us in our AR’s downplay or exaggerate certain things too.
I wonder how many ‘face scores’ or ‘body scores’ higher than 5 the WLs are giving out to the punters lol. What about ‘attitude’ 😂
My face score is, only a mother can love this. My attitude score, straight from a WL is, thank God it is you, I can trust you. As for overall looks, from the same WL, your money makes you very handsome. I can take that.Quote:
Originally Posted by Icegodofhungary
Haha, yeah, money can’t buy love, but it can buy you being ‘handsome’ and ‘so big’ for 30-60 minutes on average!Quote:
Originally Posted by ditchtheboss
The ‘thank god it’s you’ ( and not someone else) - yeah, I get that.
The comments on money and relief it’s me is a result of having one or two regulars that I treated them well and they gave me excellent service. It is not hard to treat them well and they reciprocate in spades.Quote:
Originally Posted by Icegodofhungary
I agree with the DATY comment. Fair enough if that's what gets some of you lads in the mood.
But damn, I can only do it with a significant other.
Especially if you see a women at mid or towards the end of her shift. Yuck
All reviews and posts have aspects of BS cards ie YMMV and TTMV.Quote:
Originally Posted by Migala
YMMV relates to the experiences had by the individual, and when used correctly can exempt an individual from any possible criticisms and accusations of telling porkies. The other BS card TTMV is consciously or subconsciously used to bend, exaggerate and tell porkies without getting flamed. TTMV is predominantly found in profiles, photos, age, shop rosters, nationality etc. Both go hand-in-hand and can be used to complement each other.
Really interesting post and confirming what a lot of us knew already, but good to see it.Quote:
Originally Posted by pmmeyourknee_
Curious OP how you access this as you mention it is publicly available. Thought you would need user names or some details to effect a search?
Unless the punter is super-handsome, looks like Brad Pitt, Chris Hemsworth, Daniel Henny, Jackson Wang. Then its just a job for the girl and all about money.
Many guys tell the WL & claim to be some big shot Businessman, CEO or whatever. But truth of the matter is, no amount of money can ever buy handsome looks and game/charisma. You're just another paycheck for her
These girls will sleep with a broke guy for free if he is good looking. And will give him money. Just look at the host club debt situation. This is why these Japanese WL's are doing it in the first place
Nothing wrong at all in knowing where we (men) stand in their eyes.
It's a financial transaction and we pay for those willing to sell.
The real issue is how brutally honest these girls are. It kind of bursts the bubble of many men about how they (men) want to be validated in being liked by the working ladies.
An English psychologist on a podcast a while ago said that many men go to these shops because they don't want to get rejected by women, compared to when they chase legit relationships.
Sadly, many men only get excited when they think the girl they're with "really" likes them or enjoy the sex. Strong men leave their emotions in the car and simply go in to low their rocks off.
Not sure if this is for all shops, but a WL told me that all of the girls who worked in the same brothel as she did applied numbing cream which lasts the whole day. They could be using a vibrator for an hour straight without reaching orgasm. Low chance you are making these girls cum during your session.Quote:
Originally Posted by dewayne
I think this sums it up lmaoQuote:
Originally Posted by ChadThunderrcock
Attachment 128492