My only point is that a shop gets it wrong and we all wine like crazy but when the punter gets it wrong that's Ok.Quote:
Originally Posted by wannabe
A fair go for and by both sides is all I am suggesting and we punters can help make it better for all.
A punter missing appointment is quite common, a shop blatantly switching girls to fool customers is pretty rare I must say!Quote:
Originally Posted by Oneonone
I actually called twice. The second time to inform the mamasan that I am running late and asked her whether it is still okay or not to come as I am 30 mins. She said it was still fine and so I went.Quote:
Originally Posted by wannabe
I got switched TWICE. First was over the phone, the mamasan said it was CiCi, when I got there CiCi is said to be booked till 1am (closing time). She showed me Ada and said that if you do want to go ahead you only can have the 30 mins. Over the phone I said I wanted 45 mins for CiCi. I gave the money to Ada and she went outside the room and left me to shower by myself. When the girl knocked it was another girl and I even said to her, I think you are in the wrong room, I'm with Ada. She said Ada is now with another client.
I was already in my towel by this point.
Well, I still don't think the photos look alike. Everyone keeps referring to "Lilly" Whereas i mean "Lily" with two L's not three, ie, my gangbang girl. Is she at 647 as Jennifer?Quote:
Originally Posted by Drax
Anyway, I heard Lily had recently gone on holidays, but came in for one day to 533 a week later because she was hanging out for sex! Holidays weren't agreeing with her! She practically devoured the poor guy who did the AR! So, yes, is she Jennifer at 647 - please?
Giving the money to one girl and then getting another girl is just wrong!Quote:
Originally Posted by hardcandy
It even sounds comic if you ask me ! :miao:Quote:
Originally Posted by CunningLinguist
It's kind of funny how they bump their positive threads again and again while refusing to give any comments on this topic, even when this thread is only 5 threads away from their "favorite" threads.Quote:
Originally Posted by lamb
Mate I can absolutely guarantee you Lily is Jennifer at 647. The photos on the 647 website are not the same quality as 533. However if you want a great hires photo of Lily google 'swl girls' , you may have to try 2 or 3 listings but last I checked they still have photo's up of Jennifer.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sextus
Yup I agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Who
Most pictures at 533 website are fake, please notice the background of the pictures. only one pic of Lily is real.
The pictures aren't fake, the photos of the girls are either taken by Angie or the girls give photo's of themselves to Angie.Quote:
Originally Posted by 232464
They are then added to a background in Photoshop by the company that looks after the web site, he also shades out their faces etc.
Looks like I was wrong - the pictures are shopped into the backgrounds!
But still, well done 533, compared to the minimum effort put in at every other shop in the universe except the expensive cauc shops.
Sextus did you read my post? I took the trouble and interest to ask how it was done I asked the girls and they told me.Quote:
Just to clear that issue up, and I hope this isn't boring, but..
Actually all those photos are taken in the locations shown
I then asked Angie who took the photos and she told me in most cases she did and that sometimes a girl would bring them in.
She told me she sends them to the webmaster and he photo shops them puts in the background and blanks the girls face.
So put your head in the sand if you wish but that is how it is done!
Well blow me down oneoneone, you are right! As this is quite interesting I have posted some of the photos here to show how well it is done and how it convinced me. But your words made me look a lot closer at them to figure out what is going on.Quote:
Originally Posted by Oneonone
Here is a photo of lily - see how well that shadow is put in behind her? - very convincing! But if you look closer you'll notice that she is tilted slightly to the right, she hasn't been put in standing straight. Still, to accurately manually trace around her body with a selection tool to cut her out of the original photo and drag her across is very difficult. You can never do it with perfect accuracy, which means in the photo you drag her across into, you have to manually go around with a clone tool and heal all the innaccurate joins. Which is just as much or more work to do. The cost for this specialist work would be up to the same as the shop charges for the girl per hour. Hey! nothing wrong with that, in fact it is a credit to 533 that they go to this effort to show their girls like this.
http://i1301.photobucket.com/albums/...pscc077f42.jpg
And then you see her apparently sitting on the sofa, ie, interacting with the environment she isn't even in! And with a shadow from her put in too. Very well done! I assume she ws sitting on a bed in the brothel - but the lighting on her is rather good - how can Angie be taking these?
http://i1301.photobucket.com/albums/...ps306e0166.jpg
Here, however, the shadow from Lily is coming towards us, when the lighting on lily is from the front, so that is an inconsistency, which again shows that you are right oneoneone.
http://i1301.photobucket.com/albums/...ps5099f0bf.jpg
Here with Jodie it is less convincing, the light on her is flat compared to the room - but hey! it is still well done!
http://i1301.photobucket.com/albums/...pscb75d1bb.jpg
Here with Selina, again the shadow from her is coming towards us - even though the angle of it cleverly matches the angle of the light coming in through the door, there is no light source behind her at that angle to account for her shadow, ie, the shadow has been put in. But again, this is very good work!
http://i1301.photobucket.com/albums/...psb7f22acc.jpg
I mean, look at the tricky shape of the shadow on the bed behind Jodie - he's accounted for the distorted shape of her having her hand on her hip (but overlooked putting in a shadow behind the lowest part of her left leg.) But all this is alot of highly skilled work that I didn't think they'd have the budget for - or at least want to pay it!
http://i1301.photobucket.com/albums/...ps11da5a0d.jpg
I don't know quite where he gets the shadows from - exceeds my basic knowledge! He's even curved the shadow to account for the curve of the mattress and the wooden frame that she isn't in the same room as. This is beyond the call of duty for a $150 per hour brothel webpage - compare it, for example, with the tripe masquerading as photos on the Ginza website, or 5*.
The only way to prove the girls are real is the pictures should be taken in the shop with real background as other shops did.
Why? No one who knows or has seen any of the girls is disputing if the girls are real all we are discussing is how the background is done?Quote:
Originally Posted by 232464
There is no dispute over the girls being real.
The background I find very interesting as in my opinion it is very well done.
I have met 90% of the girls and I have no doubt that their photos are real, a couple are photo shopped too much but still of the girl.
Taking some liberties here :)
Ahem!Quote:
Originally Posted by Sextus
There are other ways to select besides manual which can make the work alot easier.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sextus
The inference being ...Quote:
Originally Posted by Sextus
How can you tell it is a man doing the work ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sextus
This post was about Mico so getting back to her . I had a booking with another and was given Mico.
I reluctantly agreed coz I thought she might have a decent set of cans and I thought I could work with that.
But got caught out by the evil deceptive push up bra. She is a nice enough lady but she is ordinary looking
and i guess she gets switched alot as she has no bookings.
I don't like too fuck with someones means of income/ livelihood , but its fair too give warning to others before they blow $90/$150.
I have been fucked around a few times in this shop but most of the time things work out.
But I'will walk if it happens again.
As per the title, Fuck me once shame on you, fuck me twice shame on me!
Do tell! The girls' bodies are skin and clothes and hair and are all different colours and an organic shape. Don't know how any automatic ways would be able to tell what was girl and what was background. Wow, how difficult would it be to trace the area betweem their legs for example, as with Selina with the floorboards showing between the gap in her legs.Quote:
Originally Posted by CunningLinguist
Try the fuzzy select or the "contiguous regions" select. It will select regions of a similar colour, you can do a bunch of these and add to the selection to make a whole body etc.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sextus
I'll try it mate - thanks!
Dear the goat - sorry about this diversion, but the photos that the shops post of the girls is a pretty interesting topic, and it just came up during this thread. And hey! It was a good reason to get some hot wl photos up. I'm a BIG fan of lily for example, and the best news I heard about her recently (apart from the fact that she is on holidays at the moment :( ) is that she is working on the southside of the harbour now as well. I'd love to get her freshly back from holidays and dripping for it - wow!
Well said.Quote:
Originally Posted by thegoat