Be alert, not alarmed.

It is simple, really.

Brownwallaby is a known child sex offender in SEQ, he is known to QPS and Corrective Services (Maroochydore Probation and Parole and Logan Probation and Parole).

So I don't have much time for him, he's a rockspider. But AFAIK he is not in violation of any parole conditions by visiting shops or posting online.

But in the context of this forum he is also a relentless shitposter. Basically spamming the shit out of every thread without actually contributing anything simply to enhance his post count. He also uses shill accounts to compliment himself and back up his ridiculous fanciful stories about how all the MLs at every shop flock to him and chat about their secrets and offer constant free extras.

I appreciate that there are a number of people here who think highly of BW however I do not and I do not feel that I can bite my tongue on this convicted sex offender any longer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Heisenberg

It is simple, really.

Brownwallaby is a known child sex offender in SEQ, he is known to QPS and Corrective Services (Maroochydore Probation and Parole and Logan Probation and Parole).

So I don't have much time for him, he's a rockspider. But AFAIK he is not in violation of any parole conditions by visiting shops or posting online.

But in the context of this forum he is also a relentless shitposter. Basically spamming the shit out of every thread without actually contributing anything simply to enhance his post count. He also uses shill accounts to compliment himself and back up his ridiculous fanciful stories about how all the MLs at every shop flock to him and chat about their secrets and offer constant free extras.

I appreciate that there are a number of people here who think highly of BW however I do not and I do not feel that I can bite my tongue on this convicted sex offender any longer.

---

Curious how you know so much about the QPS Vice Squad, their data base of sex offenders and the identity of usually annonymous online identities. People might start to wonder if you are somehow involved with the QPS yourself.

I don't know if there is any validity to your libellous accusation, but it does seem apparent that you are guilty of breaching a few statutes yourself, namely stalking and privacy legislation.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RottenLittlePunt

Curious how you know so much about the QPS Vice Squad, their data base of sex offenders and the identity of usually annonymous online identities. People might start to wonder if you are somehow involved with the QPS yourself.

I don't know if there is any validity to your libellous accusation, but it does seem apparent that you are guilty of breaching a few statutes yourself, namely stalking and privacy legislation.

---

There is nothing prohibiting me from pointing this out. Libel and slander law does not apply to pseudonyms. Also none of his charges are sub judice, I am free to comment on them. There is no issue of stalking here either, I find it amusing you'd even suggest that. Highlights your ignorance of the law.

For the record, I am not a police officer but I am a lawyer.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Heisenberg

There is nothing prohibiting me from pointing this out. Libel and slander law does not apply to pseudonyms. Also none of his charges are sub judice, I am free to comment on them. There is no issue of stalking here either, I find it amusing you'd even suggest that. Highlights your ignorance of the law.

For the record, I am not a police officer but I am a lawyer.

---

That is a fairly naive thing for a lawyer to say. If a pseudonym is sufficiently connected to his real identity then the libel still stands.

As for the stalking matter? I will explain it to you so that your "brilliant" legal mind can understand. How did you find the real name of BW in order to know his alleged criminal record? Secondly, the way in which you randomly created a thread with a fictitious story of "yours" in order to attack him specifically. Starting to sound a little more like stalking now?

Finally, looking back through some of your posts, I am wondering if the LSC is aware of your criminal activities. I hope you don't piss the wrong person off, or you might find you are no longer a lawyer :)

Silly goose, no idea about the law. I'd like for you to cite one scrap of case law supporting your pseudonym theory. It has been repeatedly smacked down in cases of twitter and forum libel, you should really educate yourself so you don't look foolish.

This is not stalking. Stalking implies a threat of violence. There is no such threat, quite the opposite in fact..

No criminal activity here, my friend. All my posts are artistic works of fiction :)

You bush lawyers really have no idea how the law works..

Barrister or Solicitor?

Either way, you're not a very professional one. Acting the way you do, not to mention the partaking in illegal activities yourself. Would have though you'd have more respect for the law, and your practising certificate.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Heisenberg

Silly goose, no idea about the law. I'd like for you to cite one scrap of case law supporting your pseudonym theory. It has been repeatedly smacked down in cases of twitter and forum libel, you should really educate yourself so you don't look foolish.

This is not stalking. Stalking implies a threat of violence. There is no such threat, quite the opposite in fact..

No criminal activity here, my friend. All my posts are artistic works of fiction :)

You bush lawyers really have no idea how the law works..

---

Like candy from a baby :)

How easy it was to draw your real character out. "Artistic works of fiction", so why are you on this board if you aren't a punter? I guess we know which ID shouldn't be trusted now boys ;)

Always fun to see how easily you can fuck one over on a person who thinks they are so smart :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Heisenberg

Stalking implies a threat of violence.

---

Not sure what law school you went to, but you might want to reread the criminal code. ;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RottenLittlePunt

Like candy from a baby :)

How easy it was to draw your real character out. "Artistic works of fiction", so why are you on this board if you aren't a punter? I guess we know which ID shouldn't be trusted now boys ;)

Always fun to see how easily you can fuck one over on a person who thinks they are so smart :)

---

Oh boy, BW's sockpuppet, you really don't get it, do you?

That's called a disclaimer, silly goose.

I am a solicitor, you are an unemployed convicted sex offender on the DSP.

Congratulations.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Heisenberg

Oh boy, BW's sockpuppet, you really don't get it, do you?

That's called a disclaimer, silly goose.

I am a solicitor, you are an unemployed convicted sex offender on the DSP.

Congratulations.

---

Can you please make up your mind, am I BW's "staunch supporter" or am I actually him? You seem confused.

It is hilarious how supposedly intelligent people assume that criticism of them is automatically support for the person they are attacking. Really shows a simplistic and juvenile mind set.


You think a "disclaimer" will stop or count as evidence in an investigation if a complaint is raised against you?

"you're honour, the crown ceased proceedings against the defendant because he said he didn't really do it"

And you thought I had little understanding of the law? LOL

Ok boys settle down. Let us enjoy the site without the arguments. Each and every person has their views. I understand your frustrations but please stop this argument and behave like grown men. I ain't trying to stir trouble but I just wish people get along. I am not taking any sides but there's too much information here.
I love Aurions!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RottenLittlePunt

Can you please make up your mind, am I BW's "staunch supporter" or am I actually him? You seem confused.

It is hilarious how supposedly intelligent people assume that criticism of them is automatically support for the person they are attacking. Really shows a simplistic and juvenile mind set.


You think a "disclaimer" will stop or count as evidence in an investigation if a complaint is raised against you?

"you're honour, the crown ceased proceedings against the defendant because he said he didn't really do it"

And you thought I had little understanding of the law? LOL

---

Tell me how many prosecutors are going to bring a case with no evidence and no admission against a lawyer with deep pockets.

Not many.

Police steer clear as well

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Heisenberg

Tell me how many prosecutors are going to bring a case with no evidence and no admission against a lawyer with deep pockets.

Not many.

Police steer clear as well

---

Who said anything about a prosecution? You REALLY don't know much about being a professional do you? LOL

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by RottenLittlePunt

Who said anything about a prosecution? You REALLY don't know much about being a professional do you? LOL

---

Well that's the only option available to you lot.

You don't have enough details for a professional complaint.

Also the whole post was about a court case.

"I also wish them luck. But they're on an industrial estate, around the corner and not on a main road.

If they're after women for massage + other beauty treatment, they're in a bad location.

I'm not just whinging, I do this for a living."

Solicitor or real estate agent, which is it?

A solicitor as I said before and in the other thread surrounding legalities of extras in shops vs private.

You can't run a 24/7 massage shop in any old shop

Twinkle twinkle little star, how I wonder what you are. Up above the world so high, like a diamond in the sky! Twinkle twinkle little star, how I wonder what you are!!!!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Heisenberg

I wasn't actually referring to you, BW.

You're probably worse than a cop, you're a shitposter. Never posted a single decent review except for Mozhi spamming back in early 2013, never posted any helpful advice or new shops

And yes, I've read every single one of your posts.

You'd think someone who spends between 6 and 12 hours a day browsing this site as you do would come up with some useful posts but apparently not.

You're worse than useless. I was warned about you by multiple people and they were right.

---

Spending a lot of time here yourself.
posting whole day from 12:56pm to 10:25pm

Getting close to Brownwallaby's status.

"There is nothing prohibiting me from pointing this out. Libel and slander law does not apply to pseudonyms. "

This is actually 100% correct.

Also since BW's real name has not been mentioned by anyone previous to this thread being posted, there is no grounds for a complaint either.

Everything is clear here. Heisenberg has stated that all of his posts are fictitious. All of his accusations etc are just word play. Even his profession is not a solicitor. He's actually a prison guard, hence his knowledge of criminals and how their mind works ....
I wish we could stop this thread. This does not increase our chance to get a bj from that lass at Blueballs Massage

If it is fictitious then there is nothing to worry about ;)

If anyone wants to no who is or is not wanking me off at massarge parlors please p.m me...

Ive got a mouth like a crack whore short of cash on a friday night!

Why do they call you oilman?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gpeck80

"There is nothing prohibiting me from pointing this out. Libel and slander law does not apply to pseudonyms. "

This is actually 100% correct.

Also since BW's real name has not been mentioned by anyone previous to this thread being posted, there is no grounds for a complaint either.

---

Actually it isn't :)

"In order to defame someone it is essential that the statement identifies them. This does not mean that the plaintiff must be personally named. Typically, all that is required is that the details that are published lead a specific class of reader to identify the person as the subject of the defamatory statement."

As I stated, if a pseudonym is sufficiently connected to the person's real identity then the defamation still stands. eg "Baz" Luhrmann is a famous pseudonym for Mark Anthony Luhrmann, any defamation made against "Baz" Luhrmann is in fact against Mark Anthony Luhrmann.

the problem is, brownwallaby doesn't exist. He's a myth. all of his postings are fictitious :p