Audrey - Starfish princess

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by the doctor.

.
Its just hard for me to spend that much and be disappointed.

---

It works both ways, for others, it's hard to spend anything for something that's not what you want. Even disappointment is out of the question because you're not excited in the first place !

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by 4some

I've seen in the past where users of this forum have submitted negative reviews, and for whatever reason, often these guys would get attacked or criticised (and unfairly). But I know when I read these reviews I value them as much as the positive reviews. So hopefully, there will be some of you who will appreciate this review.

I have had poor experiences in the past with some girls, but I figure you get what you pay for. I have never had bad service in the $300+ range previously until Audrey. So when I have had the poor service it's been in the under price $200 range and so I let it slide.

However, I feel compelled to write a review about my booking with Audrey - the starfish princess, given I had to pay $350 for the privilege. And I guess I'll prepare myself for all the other users that will come to her defence and of MOC and critique/attack my review.

Basically, if you are short on time, my issues with her were:

1. no DFK - I had to constantly ask if she could use her tongue to kiss. Her lips were sealed like a clam, and maybe once or twice I caught sight of her tongue
2. She was a starfish in bed - no affection or effort.
3. she clock watched. It ended up being a 45 min session. What do you do when the girls wants to finish and says times up - it just kills the moment when you have to say, "Are you sure - we have some more time left?" I could have said something, but then everything becomes so awkward.

I had an early indication that something was wrong because when I tried to kiss her in the shower, she pulled away, but I just put it down to her slowly warming into the action. She was quite good at talking and having a conversation - she was happy to do that. But unfortunately, it was like that for the rest of the session - no DFK (at least there was plenty of pussy juice - so she must have been turned on enough, but not enough to give me a GFE).

And before you ask - no, I didn't smell -I had used mouthwash etc etc and I was friendly etc and this was early evening so she wasn't tired.

To add to my misery, the booking started more than 30 mins late - MOC mucked me around with apartments. They told me to go to the lobby of Apartment/hotel A. So I wait there for 10 mins. Then they tell me to go to Apartment B. James takes me up to the Apartment - stinks of smoke, there's a vacuum cleaner in the entrance to this tiny bedroom and cigarette butts in an ash tray next to the bed. so then he tells me to go back to the lobby of the first place and wait there. Finally can go up to the room - small and pokey - classy (not).

Straight after my session I called MOC to voice my disappointment. After 2 days of going back and forth with MOC, it became a case of he says, she says. Obviously, Audrey is going to deny everything. So in the end MOC has refused to do anything. Not sure what happened to the philosophy of the customer is always right. I would have thought as a goodwill gesture MOC could have offered some sort of discount for a future booking with another girl. The reality of the situation hit home when they said if I could prove that Audrey had done the wrong thing, then Audrey would have to agree to refund me $50 (this is how much they said I could get back if she agreed to it). So of course she is going to say she provided excellent service - and after all she has gone into this business to make money - not to give it back.

No doubt, there will be others who will have had a better time with Audrey and the old saying about YMMV gets wheeled out. But as a regular user/reviewer on this forum, others should be aware that just like me, it could be hit or miss with her, and given there are plenty of other agencies around, definitely think about booking a girl who you know will give consistently good service.

Anyway, hopefully, I won't have any more dud roots for a long time to come - such an expensive bloody waste of time and money. And hopefully, I have saved some users/readers of this forum some money and time as well by writing about this.

---

I normally hide underwater, cuz my english is not really good, but I am an old punter, registered this account two years ago. I would like to point out that, if you spend $300+/hr, you are expecting a good looking and good service lady. We all doing different sorts of business here, if the product we received is not as described at least you should give some sort of refund or discount. Therefore I totally agree with you. I live pretty far away from city. Tried there service once, spent $380/hr for Molan. She's pretty hot, but her fake moan was a huge turn down for me, and she couldn't perform the proper DFK. Moreover, she just want you to cum as soon as you could.It might be my "bad luck", but I won't spend $150 more for this kind of bad punt, because I could get a better service with less money somewhere else. Therefore business owner should know that if you charge a high price, you should reach a high standard service, all the advertised words should be responsible for your customers. The service you provide should be responsible for the money we spend.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ch00080204

I normally hide underwater, cuz my english is not really good, but I am an old punter, registered this account two years ago. I would like to point out that, if you spend $300+/hr, you are expecting a good looking and good service lady. We all doing different sorts of business here, if the product we received is not as described at least you should give some sort of refund or discount. Therefore I totally agree with you. I live pretty far away from city. Tried there service once, spent $380/hr for Molan. She's pretty hot, but her fake moan was a huge turn down for me, and she couldn't perform the proper DFK. Moreover, she just want you to cum as soon as you could.It might be my "bad luck", but I won't spend $150 more for this kind of bad punt, because I could get a better service with less money somewhere else. Therefore business owner should know that if you charge a high price, you should reach a high standard service, all the advertised words should be responsible for your customers. The service you provide should be responsible for the money we spend.

---

Yes, as you spend more the risk of a bad punt should be less, the girl should do the advertised services, and if she doesn't then a refund is in order.
In my early days at MOC every punt was good, but not these days ...

Yes..the shop should have a duty of care regardless of the price point.
Even more so when you pay a premuim for the girl.
The shop should be looking at addressing any issues with the girl promptly and reimburse its customers if / as necessary.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Max Impact

CL, I've listened to some of your cynical replies but you've called me out too many times now.
I have never met Duncan from MOC or Yamada from TMC. I've meet the groundskeeper from 5* but he never discounted me. he won't even let me see Lily when I want. MOC and TMC give me no special treatment!

When you criticise and level accusations it is against an individual like me.
Please realise that.

---

I don't remember calling you out, calling you out for what ?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ch00080204

I normally hide underwater, cuz my english is not really good, but I am an old punter, registered this account two years ago. I would like to point out that, if you spend $300+/hr, you are expecting a good looking and good service lady. We all doing different sorts of business here, if the product we received is not as described at least you should give some sort of refund or discount. Therefore I totally agree with you. I live pretty far away from city. Tried there service once, spent $380/hr for Molan. She's pretty hot, but her fake moan was a huge turn down for me, and she couldn't perform the proper DFK. Moreover, she just want you to cum as soon as you could.It might be my "bad luck", but I won't spend $150 more for this kind of bad punt, because I could get a better service with less money somewhere else. Therefore business owner should know that if you charge a high price, you should reach a high standard service, all the advertised words should be responsible for your customers. The service you provide should be responsible for the money we spend.

---

Sounds like you had a similar experience to me. Looks like I am definitely not alone here. Some of these girls & MOC think they can get away with it because of their looks and unfortunately too many guys put up with it or just put it down to lack of "chemistry".

On the MOC website, Audrey is advertised as "GFE Guaranteed" and offers "DFK". I'd like to know how I can make sure that guarantee applied to me.

If you are paying over $300 and an agency is positioning themselves as offering high quality girls and "premium" services then we should expect to receive it.

So CH, I hope at least by me posting my review, I have saved you a trip into town and $350 by not making a booking with A. And you have certainly saved me from making the same mistake by not booking Molan.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CunningLinguist

I don't remember calling you out, calling you out for what ?

---

I thought that you were inferring I receive special treatment from some shops? I'm sorry if I mistook your comment CL.

It makes me a very grumpy pirate when I hear that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sifu

Good on u 4some for your post! I was considering her this week but these days I am very apprehensive about forking out $350 to $400 for a substandard experience, and alas Ive had more bad experiences than good at these places.
Yes you do find good ones but I have been punting for a long time and these agencies have become complacent and these days pass off average girls as models.
MOC used to be good but these days the girls are average. They say it is hard to recruit girls but should that be our problem?
Thats why we're paying them isn't it?
Some guys think that $350 isn't much money, i totally disagree, the agencies and the girls have become greedy and the girls even lazier. It's a case of bad habits breeding bad habits. Over time there is this new expectation that 350 is the norm... It definitely isn't!

---

Very good post Sifu and I totally agree.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sifu

Good on u 4some for your post! I was considering her this week but these days I am very apprehensive about forking out $350 to $400 for a substandard experience, and alas Ive had more bad experiences than good at these places.
Yes you do find good ones but I have been punting for a long time and these agencies have become complacent and these days pass off average girls as models.
MOC used to be good but these days the girls are average. They say it is hard to recruit girls but should that be our problem?
Thats why we're paying them isn't it?
Some guys think that $350 isn't much money, i totally disagree, the agencies and the girls have become greedy and the girls even lazier. It's a case of bad habits breeding bad habits. Over time there is this new expectation that 350 is the norm... It definitely isn't!

---

WELL said. I agree too. I guess 350-400 is premium price. even more expensive than upper class blonde shops like liaison or stiletto

I agree too. Saw one of MOC girls for 2 hour 2 weeks ago and the standard was down compared to last year. I will give other agencies a try before I go back to MOC.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by slowmotion

I agree too. Saw one of MOC girls for 2 hour 2 weeks ago and the standard was down compared to last year. I will give other agencies a try before I go back to MOC.

---

LOL. Where is the man? -Duncan. If all these talks keep going, all girls will only sit in your common area until Marcus back on schedule. Was about to book big lips today, now I don't know.

Big lips lol! Sounds like you know more about her than anyone!

i have a few thoughts on MOC that ive been holding onto..now is probably a good time to share them i guess

MOC pros
-best WL ive ever seen was at MOC - PORYA
-They have had a few other VERY GOOD girls - SK (personal top 10), Dior (very Good)
-ive never had any hygiene issues with the rooms

MOC cons
-some VERY BAD girls (in my opinion)
-Tedy - good bbbj, but terrible looks and couldnt provide sex because she said she was sore (fair enough, but should have given me a discount. i didnt ask for one btw because i was like meh). Max Impact bro im very suprised that you described her as cute - we must have VERY different standards..no offence seriously
-i think sometimes the MOC descriptions are very deceptive - there is one girl that has some very big and visible scars. Now when girls can only be booked for 2 or 3hrs information this SIGNIFICANT should be told upfront to the customer. I dont want to name the girl because i actually liked her, but i found this very deceptive of MOC management, and i wouldnt have booked her for if i knew this. Yes buyer beware, but i don't think its reasonable for me to have to ask "does the girl have any massive scars, goiters etc etc" before booking each time


TLDR - MOC is very inconsistent and lately there have been more misses than hits. When you're paying premium prices the bad punts really hurt. MY PERSONAL ADVICE - DONT SEE A MOC GIRL UNLESS SHE HAS AT LEAST 2 OR 3 GOOD REVIEWS FROM REVIEWERS WHO SEEM TO HAVE THE SIMILAR STANDARDS AS YOURSELF.

I too have had two less than valued experiences with this shop in the last three weeks. I wasn't going to post my experiences as I assumed ( wrongly) that mine were isolated cases. First up was linfi and at least she was into the sex and responded well to all my fairly routine requests. But in the end it was just a routine root for twice the price?! The second experience was last Thursday evening with a girl I won't mention as I ended up feeling rather sorry for her. She's dealing with some fairly serious family shit back home in Taipai and basically that's all I heard about for an hour. Time was up before I was even allowed to lay a hand on her!

Now, given the chorus of concerns being voiced I'll be a bit more cautious with my spending in this segment of the industry - it seems as though there's some changes afoot and I suspect some consolidation on the horizon.
Now if only I could get Sharena to not stand me up next time I make a booking, I'll at least feel as though I've managed to move on. Though give the prompt response I've just received Next week I feel will be Natalie's turn.

Maybe I have very low standards compared to you dfdg.

I think Tedy is super cute. The second time I saw her she was sore but she still took it well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Max Impact

Maybe I have very low standards compared to you dfdg.

I think Tedy is super cute. The second time I saw her she was sore but she still took it well.

---

No worries bro. Everyone is different. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder etcetera.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sifu

Maximpact, i think you've been around a while now so i do think your reviews and contributions are credible.
However recently there has been new light shed on how a lot of the reviews in this forum are either cash or cunt for comment.
When you take this issue as well as the fact that shops and agencies describe their girls as if they were Victorias Secret angels, you can't help becoming sick of the BS and getting ripped off due to information that may not be false but so exaggerated that it may as well be.

---

This thread is getting very interesting.

I'm a newbie here so I never imagined that any report would be written with the help of some incentive, cash or otherwise. I just assumed that all the reports, especially the long, well written, detailed reports, with titles that would have taken some time to come up with, were written by punters that are clearly passionate and just wanted to spend time writing an honest and accurate report.

Learn something new every day. Thanks.

We all love negativity and cynicism. That's why this thread has as many hits as my review of Audrey from days ago.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Max Impact

We all love negativity and cynicism. That's why this thread has as many hits as my review of Audrey from days ago.

---

Either that, or it's getting so many hit because most of us prefer not to be taken for a fool and so the truth is always going to be popular.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Sifu

cunt for comment.

---

This pithy phrase has been slaying me since it was coined a few days ago by Sifu. It is the best line of the new financial year! :shout:

I am following as I want to know good and bad. No one wants a bad punt, but even good punt reviews I read it and think about it, compare it to other reviews of the same girl.

I think it keeps the balance. But I have only been reading for 2 years and writing on the forum for 2 weeks lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dfdg

i have a few thoughts on MOC that ive been holding onto..now is probably a good time to share them i guess


-Tedy - good bbbj, but terrible looks and couldnt provide sex because she said she was sore (fair enough, but should have given me a discount. i didnt ask for one btw because i was like meh). Max Impact bro im very suprised that you described her as cute - we must have VERY different standards..no offence seriously
.

---

God "terrible" looks.... I haven't seen her and wonder how bad it is for it to be described as "terrible"...

lol but I don't want to find out...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by solopuntsydney

God "terrible" looks.... I haven't seen her and wonder how bad it is for it to be described as "terrible"...

lol but I don't want to find out...

---

Better stay away from tedy if true. Premium price for "terrible look" disaster.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by bbbccc123

Better stay away from tedy if true. Premium price for "terrible look" disaster.

---

I don't know about this terrible look descriptions, I never been with this agency and never seen the girl of course. But I believe for the agency to put this WL in their roster and charging $350/hr, the WL should be reasonably good looking! Won't you think ??

So one of the bad experiences reported here is because the WL dont provide DFK when the services advertised so by the agent ?

IMHO:

- We should understand and view this experience from the WL as well.

- WLs can not or should not provide DFK ,BBBJ to every punters even the services are advertised so!!!
Because some of the punters got bad breath and/or his hygiene/condition is not as good as expected by the lady. For example: as you might known it already , one of the punters in this forum said he wants find where the Caucasian WLs dont do the routine health checks because he got something like STDs in his genital so he ends up did a CIM on one of the poor asian WLs in one of the Asian shops here!
- So the question here is that doesn't she has the right to refuse BBBJ/DFK service to this guy even when the services advertised so ? and do you punters still want to DFK that WL after she got CIM from that guy ? or should we support asian WLs to have the rights to refuse to provide any services when she finds the punter's condition looks suspicious or she does not feel it is safe enough for her to provide the service ?

- All the Asian Shops and agents in this forum should and please advertise those DFK and BBBJ etc services with " at the lady's discretion " so all the punters are not misleading and understand that the ladies always have the rights to provide or refuse the services as all other Caucasian WLs.

- Should asian WLs have the same rights to health check the punters before she provides any natural services ?