Attractive inexperienced vs unattractive experienced

I go with good looking and appearance any day. Experience doesn’t translate much to good session as each person will be treated differently

I'd go for medium looks and a champion effort all day everyday

Different moods, wouldn't you say? Sometimes I need a WL who can suck my cock like a dyson and not afraid of taking a big load in the mouth. She can't be uggs, but she can be just ok looking. Sometimes I want a 9/10 looker, and all she has to do is let me eat then root.

For me more important than looks and experience is attitude.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rooter

For me more important than looks and experience is attitude.

---

Agreed. I try to go for the more enthusiastic looking ones in a line up.

The girls who would smile and make longer eye contact with you tend to provide better experiences.

It’s quite hard to judge from just a couple of photos and ARs if you’ll have that connection.

I agree wth holi_day above, face is less important but body is priority for me. After all it is the reason I punt.

My top WL of all time was a 40yo Mongolian MILF. Not the most physically attractive, but she definitely took care of herself. Active + yoga. So a nice rig.

She was an absolute seductress and complete ball drainer. One of the sexiest WLs I have ever met.

Inexperience ones are the one's who massage you with the sensitivity of a parrakeet
with gait hopping on your back.
Inexperience ones are like a toothless catfish abrasive and unpolished.
Give me a Dyson VII anytime.

Another false dichotomy ...
Message to Administrator.
Make members take basic logic test before signing them up.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rooter

Another false dichotomy ...
Message to Administrator.
Make members take basic logic test before signing them up.

---

Hahaha ! I’m sure he can laugh at his own joke. ;) ;) ;)

There is no correct or right answer Bud .

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Scanlan

There is no correct or right answer Bud .

---

Dokes??????????????

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by wilisno

That’s an easy choice for me !

Since both of them don’t display on their forehead how they would play in the room, I always pick the one with the look that appeals to me. If I already know how they play in the room, the good looking providing bad service, then I would pick neither of them. ;) ;) ;)

And inexperienced doesn’t translate into bad service, as long as she’s got the right personality, it’s my top choice.

---

There are times when you make a booking but the girls doesn't look like the photos. If that happens, a good service will actually make up for it and I might comeback for her.

There are also times when you choose a girl from the line up because they are pretty but then the girl doesn't provide a good service. If this is the case, I don't usually comeback for her anymore.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by didaswiwaw

There are times when you make a booking but the girls doesn't look like the photos. If that happens, a good service will actually make up for it and I might comeback for her.

There are also times when you choose a girl from the line up because they are pretty but then the girl doesn't provide a good service. If this is the case, I don't usually comeback for her anymore.

---

There is no right or wrong answer to this question, whatever flows your boat !

To me, to have a good session, I must be horny first, if the appearance of the girl doesn’t make me horny, there’s no chance for a good punt ! ;) ;) ;)