I feel that cbj has an almost zero risk of stds, while hj has at least some risk.
Because with hj there’s no telling how well they cleaned the previous guys cum from under their long nails.
Printable View
I feel that cbj has an almost zero risk of stds, while hj has at least some risk.
Because with hj there’s no telling how well they cleaned the previous guys cum from under their long nails.
Very very unlikely that a std would be transmitted because of fingernail length. The most likely pathway for infection via a hj would be semen coming in contact with broken skin e.g. a cut. So your semen poses a bigger risk to the ML than her fingernails to you. For infection to take place the bug needs to get into you. Unbroken skin is a pretty good barrier which is why washing you hands is a very effective means of stopping transmission.Quote:
Originally Posted by nambour
Well HIV, herpes, and syphilis can enter the body through the inner side of foreskin without there being obvious signs of skin damage. That's why people with foreskins have been shown to have a higher risk of HIV infection than circumsised people.Quote:
Originally Posted by FredWard63
There are usually micro ruptures to the epidermis. Damage is not visible, there's no blood. It's very hard for a virus to pass through an intact epidermis. So for a hj to lead to this, the ML would needed to have sufficient active virus particles on her hand or under her finger nails to then infect a person. That is highly improbable. Also the hj would also need to be extremely vigorous to lead to similar damage that usually results from anal sex.
Mate, the safest way to avoid STD is to enter monkhood and live in a monasteryQuote:
Originally Posted by nambour
Sent from my SM-S942B using Tapatalk
If only that were true. To be really safe you need to become a hermit.Quote:
Originally Posted by jedibear
Haha, you're totally right mate...I totally missed that [emoji1787]Quote:
Originally Posted by FredWard63
Sent from my SM-S942B using Tapatalk