Originally Posted by
rm85
The comments on here comparing sex work to the food service industry are fairly revealing. There is a difference between transaction-based consensual sex and buying a hamburger.
Sexual autonomy overrides economic freedom. Their reason is none of your business, literally. You can't just pay your way anywhere you want. You are asking these women to put things inside their body for your gratification.
Like, let's bottom line this: are you saying it ought to be illegal for a sex worker to refuse to consent to sex, for any reason, including race? Because you're describing commercialized rape. "Too bad, I paid for a service, your consent is overruled. Your discomfort is discrimination."
Would you rather institute policies that ask them to 'see' any client, naked and erect, and then give them the opportunity to refuse service on a case-by-case basis? Would that be better for you, more equal, to have all clients undress and arouse yourselves, with the chance of being asked to put your clothes back on and leave? I think it might be a good dose of perspective for some, to learn that commercial sex is mutual consumption.