Not relevant.
Printable View
Not relevant.
Perhaps if you weren't an illiterate fool, you might have read the contributions I have made or understood the context of my post you quoted.Quote:
Originally Posted by friskychris
As for me "arguing the point"? Perhaps you should criticise people who maliciously attack other posters for no reason such as the OP of this thread or the other dimwit that just likes to say "I am right" while constantly getting PROVEN wrong, gpeck.
I made my point and supported it clearly, but then I guess I am supposed to just go around telling people how wrong they are, merely because I say so. Because that wouldn't be argumentative now would it?
You really are a dimwit, aren't you? The generality is how the law is applied IN GENERAL (ie overall). Is there ever a time that you don't talk shit about a subject that you have no idea about?Quote:
Originally Posted by gpeck80
Don't have the chops for it? Your feeble minded attempts at winning an argument have failed on every account. But luckily it's the internet and if you say it enough times, it MUST be true ..... lol
It's ironic that you say that, RLP, given that your entire argument is based on your flawed reading of the law and not on any case law/precedent.
That's pretty funny and you've humiliated yourself in this thread in front of us all.
I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
Put warm oil on me & im your man = oilman...Quote:
Originally Posted by TRD Aurion
I think its best to stay on the right side of the law go to legal licenced shops and you should not have anything to worry about.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heisenberg
Ironic? There is no irony in what I said. I think the word you were looking for was hypocritical (which again, there wasn't any). Strange that a lawyer who holds himself in such high regard is such a poor wordsmith. But then you aren't much of a lawyer are you?
"Stalking implies a threat of violence"
359B What is unlawful stalking
Unlawful stalking is conduct—
......(d) that—
or
(ii) causes detriment, reasonably arising in all the circumstances, to the stalked person or another person."
Seems the actual criminal code isn't up on your view on stalking, funny that ....
"given that your entire argument is based on your flawed reading of the law"
If it is so flawed, then why did you agree with it?
" It relies on the simple test of reasonableness. Would a reasonable person know who I was referring to if I called him Baz?
Yes."
Contradict yourself much?
You're supposed to be the lawyer here and yet you think your lack of knowledge of the law, inability to comprehend what is written or articulate yourself properly should cause me embarrassment?
Nothing to worry about ???Quote:
Originally Posted by Oneonone
Worry problems at FS legal shops:
- Hang your dick under a blue light when you arrive so a stranger can inspect it.
- Full sex is the only option, the lady implys this at the start when she pulls out the lube & condom.
- Asking for a massage & hj is also the same price as full sex, it may incur a "fantasy charge" at some shops.
- bringing A.I.D.S home because if shes having full sex with you shes having full sex with 10 other blokes.
Worry problems at Massage shops:
- Getting busted. ..
Wake up Q.L.D, stop hiding begind bull shit excuses, make massage parlors legal in!!!
100% agree with oilman.
I laughed at the legal brothel owners whinging in the newspaper about massage shops driving them to the wall.
Don't complain about that, lobby the government to relax laws and improve your offerings. If massage shops went away, I wouldn't increase FS shop visits, I'd go to Sydney instead as I still do sometimes now.
Quote:
Originally Posted by oilman
The risk of AIDS "should" be less in a brothel if they are having protected sex as per the law. At a massage shop there would also be a risk (if not increased risk) of contracting an STI since it is not regulated and therefore possibly less safe practices/health checks.
Of course if you are only referring to a massage and HJ then that risk factor isn't relevant in either category.
No one has full sex at the massage shops, its always & is only about massage, hj, tit fell & or nudity.
In my opinion massage shops are not legal because Its an Asian dominated business & we all no what Q.L.D is like.... Why wouldn't you legalize it, tax, police time no longer wasted, put the bike gangs out of the picture... Or is there to many brown paper bags at the top of the food chain???
Quote:
Originally Posted by oilman
There are a few that say they have had FS experiences. The most I have experienced is a BJ.
You're being a bit naive Oilman. I was offered FS at a massage shop with a ML I'd only seen twice. (I just had to bring my own rubber) I took her up on the offer a few times. I'm definitely not some player, so I figured if I got the offer, it must not be that rare.Quote:
Originally Posted by oilman
FS, BJ at massage shops? Wow, news to me :p
This thread is getting quite boring now!!! How about we move on
How about you guys go to Angie Massage balaclava street?
Just came out from another great massage at this shop I also noticed a few new girls working!!
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
who is this Broownwallaby imposter?
I think I might have to start another thread about Aurions...
This one is still going on :D