You haven't had her sevices then 🤣
Printable View
You haven't had her sevices then 🤣
does Apple still work there?
Who are you to judge another person like that ?????
Think of the type of persons she has to deal with
Natalie is actually one of the gentlest and kindest people you're ever likely to meet but I guess you'll never meet her going by your divk brain comments - lucky her
Come on Mr J, jikijiki1 is an esteemed member, he's entitled to his opinion, free forum. If you're going to call someone out, you have to vet: 3 years, 14 posts... 11 include question marks... 1 (count 'em, one) AR. If all were like that, this would be a very SPARSE forum. But fits the handle:
Kannada-English dictionary
Jikijiki in Kannada glossary
Jikijiki (ಜಿಕಿಜಿಕಿ):—[noun] (dial.) the quality or tendency of a person who gives or spends grudgingly or only through necessity; a miserliness; stinginess.
But what do I know? They can't even spell Canada correctly!
Natalie's a good girl inside, everything she does is to make the punters happy.
Saw Paula yesterday - good service but limited english. Looks a bit like Kurea Hasumi. Would recommend
Humblest apols 11B - challenging day with very little and he chose one of the kindest ladies I've met in 4 years - saw red and punched the buttons then sent before I thought about it - will send to you for vetting next time I have the urge and I'm sure you'll spell check etc for me then send it back saying - not worth the effort or ......
:-) appreciate your input
Sorry, you misunderstood but that's on me as I quoted you rather than the post you were responding to. My comment on vetting was referring to the original post, not your response. Vetting you would take quite the effort, vetting others obviously easier when their TOTAL contribution (and yes, I use the term loosely) is a single page. Simple eyeball scan (thanks sysadmin for the title and first couple of lines of a post), those parses go rather fast to catch the drift.
Before I even vetted Mr gives grudgingly (gee, wonder why so many ladies have a NO... in their description), this caught my eye in the original post (bold for emphasis):
WHERE'S THE AR?
And in parsing,
OK... again, WHERE?
Quick to denigrate... but recommendations...? Oh, never mind, because, like I said, you gotta consider the source. QED.