Cunt Destroyer dude, you undermine yourself by arguing the man and not the points. For mine, I find your handle hilariously politically incorrect, so if you could argue with similar irony it would be much better.
Cunt Destroyer dude, you undermine yourself by arguing the man and not the points. For mine, I find your handle hilariously politically incorrect, so if you could argue with similar irony it would be much better.
What a charmer you are. Centre of the moral universe? Hardly. Just prepared to call a narrow-minded bigot or hypocrite when I see one.
The insults are flying now! :question:Quote:
Originally Posted by asiafever
I called nobody in particular a hypocrite or narrow-minded bigot. I do find some of the views I covered from several of the posts to fit in this category. CD took umbrage, possibly because he didn't like his pov being questioned in such manner, really not my concern.
He he..I'm afraid this is the universal out asiafever. Girl on girl action is merely femininity x 2 or more from an heteros' point of view.Quote:
Originally Posted by asiafever
Ha ha! That is funny mate. But this is also taken into account by the principle of identification. Their cock's are but mere stand ins for your own. Take the girl out of the clip and the heteros run a mile from it. So when those video cocks part those hot pussy lips (assuming you are wanking, or thinking of wanking) it is not their cock doing it, but yours.Quote:
Originally Posted by asiafever
Speaking from real life experience, a gangbang is no more than live, 3D, interactive porn. :D Believe me, unless the guys are on the girl at any one time, you just don't see them, they are invisible like the furniture.Quote:
Originally Posted by asiafever
Oh I agree with all you've written there sextus. No argument at all from me, but it is all based on a point of view. I have read your gangbang reports with great interest, and would like to try some day. I have a friend, her and her partner are swingers, not my cup of tea but good luck to them, when one of the mum's from the school found out she was basically run out of the area, kids harassed etc. Awful stuff.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cunt Destroyer
The Destroyer is gonna be banned again, and again, and again, and again, and again, and again, and again, and again, and again..............!!
I concur with everything AHLUNGOR, isis and asiafever has said. Well said you three!
As to CD, I am just waiting for him to say how much he likes certain "poetry" to confirm my suspicions ;)
I should add that it isn't fair to condemn those who find male homosexual sex repulsive. Not the man, the act. We were born that way. Just as homosexuals and trannies were born that way. If we didn't find the act repulsive and instead found it attractive, we would, ipso facto, be homosexuals. Or variants of. In the case of transexual's, this subject of this thread, the act may be dressed up with a pair of artificial tits, but every cell in their bodies is still full of XY's!
Don't mistake distaste for condemnation though. Because I can't help but feel distaste when I contemplate some bloke fiddling with and sucking a slack, tiny, barely functional penis and a couple of micro balls drowning in a sea of oestrogen tablets! :shout:
That is a black and white view. Just because you don't find it repulsive doesn't mean you therefore find it attractive, or vice verca. The church has an awful cop out line they pull out when condemning gays etc to hell. "We only hate the sin not the sinner.". Like I said, whatever people do behind closed doors is their business, and perfectly valid in it's own right. I agree that distaste for the act and condemnation of those involved are two different things, just as some find gangbangs repulsive or even the idea of visiting a brothel. We're all individuals. We're all different. ("I'm not...")
I think they should pay homage to the Red Dwarf character Arnold Judas Rimmer by displaying the letter LB somewhere on their person :)Quote:
Originally Posted by AHLUNGOR
Seriously I don't want to see the person if they are a LB, so better not to do the walk by.
I feel the same about dickfull and dickless LBs :)Quote:
Originally Posted by AHLUNGOR
I should have copyrighted that sentence :)Quote:
Originally Posted by AHLUNGOR
I reckon a LB only shop is the way to go!
Actually Sextus. That is not ipso facto, and is, in fact, bullshit.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sextus
I can watch two males kissing (have done so with several friends who are homosexual) and I do not feel repulsed, nor do I feel turned on. In fact the only feelings I have at the sight is happiness for my friends that they are in such a loving relationship (something that many of us would be jealous of - the relationship, not who it is with). I do not however, seek out homosexual porn, nor do I feel any desire at all to consort with other men. As I stated, just because you are not repulsed by something doesn't mean you would be turned on by it either. Ispo facto - your statement that that is the case is bullshit **shrugs**
And of course there is condemnation rather than distaste in this thread. Just look at some of the comments describing people who may use this service as "dirty old queers" or similar.
I think that many of you are forgetting that society (as a whole) would see us (users of R&T and FS shops) as deviants. That perception is not necessarily one that we are comfortable with, and it isn't necessarily correct either, and I, for one, do not believe we should condemning others who are doing something that they enjoy (that is legal). Treat others as you would be treated and all that... :)
Exactly :)Quote:
Originally Posted by asiafever
And some of us are very naughty little boys too ;)
There used to be a shop in Melbourne that had 2 entrances, one for the girls and one for lb's. Seemed to do a good trade. I think you're probably right cl. Better be a stand alone shop, even if it's a branch of a famous shop.
what people do in the privacy of their own homes is their business, yeah yeah fair enough. havent heard anyone disagree with that
the current topic is not about that though. What we are discussing is our thoughts and feelings about introducing transexual sex workers into the shop that we visit.
the thing about these politically correct lefty elitists is that they deny the right of anyone to hold an opinion that happens to differ even slightly from their own.
so when someone admits to feeling 'disgusted' by transvestites. Apparently the act of 'feeling disgusted' is itself a hatecrime and deserving of condemnation.
when someone expresses the opinion that cross dressing and genital mutilation is a 'perversion'. This opinion is denounced as illegitimate, bigotted and narrow minded!
the only 'correct' feeling, values and beliefs are the ones these guys say you can have (ie. pro-gay, pro-left, pro-minority bleeding heart sentamentalism)
How about we stick a gold star on them too?Quote:
Originally Posted by CunningLinguist
I see no issues with this, as long as the shop is up front about providing this service. You have every right as a customer to state that you do not want see the LB and so skip any intro to one. I would feel entirely comfortable going to a shop with LBs as long as I can tell management that I am not interested.
Glad my reference wasn't lost uglyphil...