In their ad, they have them as
Helen 28
Lucky 32
Do they look over 40?
Printable View
It's hard to tell exactly how old they are but I would say both are older than stated in their ad. Not terrible but don't expect young ah ha
$150 for 60 with everything on offer.
Does anyone know if Private Messaging service works? Or are there any specific criteria to be met before using it for private chat with fellow punters? Any experience please. Thank you!
Thanks mate, I did that but no response. I thought may be there must be certain privileges to access this feature. I did sent a PM to someone couple of weeks ago, but since I didn’t get a reply, thought I ask here. Thanks again for your reply mate. Happy punting!
What is the go with all these new young girls jacking up the prices? If you don't mind them a bit older and more experienced you can get a full service, half hour for $100-$120, that includes the $50 cover charge. With places like Hanbury st getting a few young girls from out of town, they want top dollar just because they are young and pretty. They have an inflated menu worse than McDonalds. I even had 2 M/L's complain to me that they can't get young girls because they can get more money elsewhere.
Can we get some of you writting a review on how these younger girls are so much better than the older ones and why they are worth so much $$$. Also, what you usually spend.
I concur this. Possibly, Hanbury St is one of the cheapest massage shops out there where you can still access everything for $150 per hour irrespective of age of the ladies you get. At least that’s the vibe I got when I visited them twice.
But it makes logical sense, why would younger girls want to work at such a joint if they can demand higher rate by working private. May be business/ economy is too slow, spending power of guests are not there yet. I feel like mamsan of Hanbury St is somehow managing to bring relatively younger girls (ymmv as always) to this shop which is under new management.