Ginza AR (Annual Report 2023)..who's your MMA (Most Memorable Asian)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jack-Jack

JxK MIKU -- this horny girl we joked about her going Lesbian and how she likes girl girl action AND NOW her profile got changed to LESBIAN DOUBLES OK

AR Here:
http://www.aus99forum.com/showthread...-sweet-heart!!

Hmmmm now who to double her with xD :miao:

---

30min les double haha

Oh and your Bella thread is waiting for you mate. Just in case you haven't seen all my other posts. Hope you're having a nice day lol.

What a day what a wonderful day ….

You know you’re in heaven or about to have the best day in Ginza when you get sent to the special room upstairs with the fireplace…. Yup you know the one …. The many special girls that hold their spot in that room

Hokey smokes Ginza club just delivered a new smoking ace thank you Ginza for continuously blessing us with such hot talent! :miao:

What other poor girl are you going to attack???

Hopefully not the older K girls at Ginza. Or are you???

Do you realise Naomi is the same age as some of them?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jack-Jack

What a day what a wonderful day ….

You know you’re in heaven or about to have the best day in Ginza when you get sent to the special room upstairs with the fireplace…. Yup you know the one …. The many special girls that hold their spot in that room

Hokey smokes Ginza club just delivered a new smoking ace thank you Ginza for continuously blessing us with such hot talent! :miao:

---

Which girl JACK JACK!! :miao: Which shop pls tell us

Why room special??? it have spa/jacuzi or like some shop with J girl they have balloon air bed for nuru sliding?

thanks u bro

Anyone seen J Toka?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BabyWolfBangBangBang

Which girl JACK JACK!! :miao: Which shop pls tell us

Why room special??? it have spa/jacuzi or like some shop with J girl they have balloon air bed for nuru sliding?

thanks u bro

---

GINZA CLUB hahaha. :miao:

Who is YOUR view and YOUR opinion on best looking girl really that Ginza Club or Empire….

Maybe top 3

I’m been craving for some top bangers esp after FOMO
of missing out on K Chloe ….

If just one person shares their top 3 I’ll drop name for the new best looker I found (IMHO YMMV)

To me on some angles coupled with red lights she likes a poor man’s version of ANGELA BABY Google her and don’t me you don’t get a hard on

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jack-Jack

Who is YOUR view and YOUR opinion on best looking girl really that Ginza Club or Empire….

Maybe top 3

I’m been craving for some top bangers esp after FOMO
of missing out on K Chloe ….

If just one person shares their top 3 I’ll drop name for the new best looker I found (IMHO YMMV)

To me on some angles coupled with red lights she likes a poor man’s version of ANGELA BABY Google her and don’t me you don’t get a hard on

---

Really keen to hear, Angela Baby is the perfect specimen IMO.

Best looker: J Shion.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jack-Jack

Who is YOUR view and YOUR opinion on best looking girl really that Ginza Club or Empire….

Maybe top 3

I’m been craving for some top bangers esp after FOMO
of missing out on K Chloe ….

If just one person shares their top 3 I’ll drop name for the new best looker I found (IMHO YMMV)

To me on some angles coupled with red lights she likes a poor man’s version of ANGELA BABY Google her and don’t me you don’t get a hard on

---

I think the best looking ones go well beyond the ratings. Beauty is how one makes others feel. To that end I haven’t met any girl from Ginza who made me feel bad. How is that for the stupid, skin deep threads on ratings and who is best looking? Value them don’t rate them.

The most beautiful ones are always the ones who got away

That is a great post. Never did like the ratings thing either. They are all attractive in their own way.

Sure, but you need an objective standard to rate. Some girls are prettier than others. Even if it's through a subjective lens of the reviewer, at least the scale would be consistent.

Saw another poster say the term "cute" has become a synonym for unattractive or sub-average. And they're right - I'm guilty of the same too.

And yeah, if you're paying for a MILF, of course you're paying primarily for the service.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ironmonk

And yeah, if you're paying for a MILF, of course you're paying primarily for the service.

---

There are plenty of hot af "milfs" out there based on looks

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ironmonk

Sure, but you need an objective standard to rate. Some girls are prettier than others. Even if it's through a subjective lens of the reviewer, at least the scale would be consistent.

Saw another poster say the term "cute" has become a synonym for unattractive or sub-average. And they're right - I'm guilty of the same too.

---

Agreed, it allows a person to maintain a somewhat objective and consistent way of recounting their session when they're writing their after report, it obviously subjective and ymmv for each person. If someone don't agree, they can contribute and write their own AR. I think if someone don't want to include scores, that fine too, each to their own. Everyone has different styles. There already not enough after reports as it is, no point chastising people for different after report styles.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ED69

There are plenty of hot af "milfs" out there based on looks

---

For sure man. I love K Ari. Plenty of people saying she's not their type, not the best looking etc, but I don't care. No point debating them all. Her face and eyes specifically does it for me. (I'd rate her a 7.5+ on my scale btw)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by hereforgoodtime

Agreed, it allows a person to maintain a somewhat objective and consistent way of recounting their session when they're writing their after report, it obviously subjective and ymmv for each person. If someone don't agree, they can contribute and write their own AR. I think if someone don't want to include scores, that fine too, each to their own. Everyone has different styles. There already not enough after reports as it is, no point chastising people for different after report styles.

---

I also agree, censoring and policing is not the answer here, I find scores helpful specially when I already gauged the baseline of the reviewer and can compare to my own preferences. The vague “cute”, “GND”, “glamour” terms don’t help me much personally.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by minimaleffort

I also agree, censoring and policing is not the answer here, I find scores helpful specially when I already gauged the baseline of the reviewer and can compare to my own preferences. The vague “cute”, “GND”, “glamour” terms don’t help me much personally.

---

The main issue is less about rating and more about how the post was written. Comparing people’s faces and putting a dollar figure on it is low and hurtful. Referring to someone as a Thai auntie and saying you can buy someone better for $10 more is also low. Finally saying “her face is below average and she is like an auntie” should not be an acceptable behaviour. It is low, hurtful and we know the girls read these posts.

Using a rate system to rate a service such as girl A gave me a 10 service but girl B a 7 from a service perspective is ok, but referring to people’s innate and unchangeable characteristics such as looks and age in such a low manner should not be acceptable even in an punting forum.

I bet even the shops disagree with such behaviour, they are and should be all about the girls physical and emotional wellbeing. Those who can’t understand that or have a problem with it will never understand the real point.

Where is Rooter? Bring him back, he had a sense of humour, never rated anyone, from memory, and never compared anyone in such terms. He had class, as much as one can have amongst us punters. Bring him back, comment on services, AR is about service and don’t make negative comments about people’s physical, unchangeable characteristics.

That’s what it was all about.

P.S apologies for quoting verbatim what should not have been repeated.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ditchtheboss

The main issue is less about rating and more about how the post was written. Comparing people’s faces and putting a dollar figure on it is low and hurtful. Referring to someone as a Thai auntie and saying you can buy someone better for $10 more is also low. Finally saying “her face is below average and she is like an auntie” should not be an acceptable behaviour. It is low, hurtful and we know the girls read these posts.

Using a rate system to rate a service such as girl A gave me a 10 service but girl B a 7 from a service perspective is ok, but referring to people’s innate and unchangeable characteristics such as looks and age in such a low manner should not be acceptable even in an punting forum.

I bet even the shops disagree with such behaviour, they are and should be all about the girls physical and emotional wellbeing. Those who can’t understand that or have a problem with it will never understand the real point.

Where is Rooter? Bring him back, he had a sense of humour, never rated anyone, from memory, and never compared anyone in such terms. He had class, as much as one can have amongst us punters. Bring him back, comment on services, AR is about service and don’t make negative comments about people’s physical, unchangeable characteristics.

That’s what it was all about.

P.S apologies for quoting verbatim what should not have been repeated.

---

You've nailed it succinctly DTB!

Agree, where is statesman Rooter??