It was on the news they stated she's gone to a new property in France with a fiancee and a near 3 million. Probably some sports cars to.Quote:
Originally Posted by frisson
Printable View
It was on the news they stated she's gone to a new property in France with a fiancee and a near 3 million. Probably some sports cars to.Quote:
Originally Posted by frisson
$600 000 for the property? Much cheaper than SydneyQuote:
Originally Posted by JSteel96
As a taxpayer who presumably contributed for this, am I entitled to rent share maybe 1 day a year there?
Well it was Lehrmann who sued channel 10 and Lisa Wilkinson so no one needs to be selectively outraged about their precious taxpayer dollars.Quote:
Originally Posted by frisson
Dudes are so made that a woman claimed she was raped, makes me wonder why.
If a woman claims to have been raped, then it is up to the legal system to deal with the alleged rapist. The real issue is the huge compensation amount (north of $2,000,000).Quote:
Originally Posted by ReginaldBubbles
Keep in mind that most victims of other crimes and accidents do not end up getting anywhere this amount.
For example, if someone loses their eyesight, or an arm or a leg, they would not get this kind of money. I am aware that her compensation relates to the Commonwealth's failure in its "duty of care". Not relating to having had an unwelcome "penis in her vagina" [the expression she used in the witness box a couple of weeks ago during the defamation trials].
This story makes JJ, Begov94 and the other aliases look like a cheap pantomime.
Anyway, the other politician ie Linda Reynolds has now put a freezing order on the fat narcissist that could prevent her from shifting any of the assets to France etc at least until the case has been finalised by the court.
What a cluster fuck!
Reynolds is an imbecile. You can’t freeze assets unless they were illegally gained. This payment was signed off at the highest levels of Govt. Higgin’s lawyers were on the front foot from the moment Morrison apologised to her in the House of Reps for the ordeal she went through. No way back after that.
Same people jumping up and down over this were silent when the LNP bought a property off their donors for ten times market value. As if a few paper bags didn’t go the other way on this corrupt deal.
She did? With what power?Quote:
Originally Posted by Double_Adapter
Higgins got 2.4 million because the government admitted it breached it's duty of care in the workplace. Why you so mad? Do you think that's what caused the cost of living crisis? People get workplace settlements like this all the time, this one just happens to be very public.
Dude's are so mad though for some reason.
A considered summation on this saga that's drawing to a close.Quote:
Originally Posted by ReginaldBubbles
https://theshot.net.au/news/general-...in-house-rape/
Remember Robodebt? Morrison & his LNP govt. were capable of cover-ups, so this is no surprise
People are mad because there is clearly a disconnect between the perceived "damage" and the payment amount.Quote:
Originally Posted by ReginaldBubbles
You are correct, these types of settlements are often made in workplace disputes.
And I would say, people would also get mad at those if they were made public.
In other words, people are not singling out Higgins just because she's Higgins or because she's a woman. It is simply the overall feeling of undeserved benefit that the person in question is getting.
if you think damages awarded in Australia are big, then have a look at the USA.
Two poll clerks who Rudolph Giuliani accused of rigging the US Presidential election sued for defamation and were awarded US$148 Million in damages - that's around AUD$220 Million!
What was the final outcome from the expert 'lip reader' they brought in?
This place has an abundance of lip readers.
Saw some footage from the bar on the night of the incident. She was wearing a low cut white singlet top. Much slimmer than now and very busty.
All I want to say is that she was very fuckable on that look. But of course, rape is totally unacceptable and a crime .
Going out of character is the reason why.Quote:
Originally Posted by ReginaldBubbles
This is some of the lip reader, Tim Reedy's report. He's profoundly deaf since birth apparentlyQuote:
Originally Posted by Double_Adapter
Attachment 107724
Well no actually, in the contract the two million plus dollars was given without any admission of liability by the goverment of any failures whatsoever.Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewv
The turkey Morrison getting up in parliament and apologising like it was rock solid fact, because it was on The Project, as someone else here pointed out, had her lawyers rubbing their hands together in glee. That is all that achieved.
It is off topic, but another huge goof he made was instead of any other nation, including the US, putting his dopey scone above the trenches, big noting himself shouting for a coronavirus origins enquiry. That cost Australia 20 billion in trade with China - for what? To big note himself?
Quote:
Originally Posted by fud
It is estimated that only 30% to 40% of speech sounds can be lip-read even under the best conditions and extra information is usually required to understand what is being said.
https://www.ndcs.org.uk/information-...20being%20said.
Lip reading is fucken voodoo :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamez11
They may as well bring in a Tarot Card reader and Palm reader :)
I like the narrative that the man went back to the office at 1am in the morning with an attractive drunk lady, to do some office work. So dedicated, that he didn't bother taking the poor lady home safely first. His work was just that important
His gf was ringing him and he didn't answer, it's in the Court transcripts, because he had to do paperwork
Not saying it's true or false, just that it reflects a great work ethic
Mate. The court case needed 3 lip readersQuote:
Originally Posted by rooter
Some many people testifying and talking through the sides of their mouths
Maybe she had to do paperwork as well and they decided to share a cabQuote:
Originally Posted by frisson
Yes. 10 vodkas later and the typical woman is thinking of going back into the office to do office work. I call BS on thatQuote:
Originally Posted by kingwally
That's exactly the part I don't get, Why an intoxicated persn after having 10 shots had to go inside the building and then the ministerial office? Bruce had to get his keys or whatever she could have clearly waited outside or in the Uber.
Bruce had to get his keys, something that takes less than 5 minutes?Quote:
Originally Posted by personaa
So he had to bring a very drunk Brittany in to the office with her ? A drunk lady that he had paid to get drunk
I call BS on that too
He also had to drink Whisky and do paperwork according to court transcripts
I don't understand the basis of the claim that the taxpayer was liable for what happened to Brittany and paid her over $2 million
What does the taxpayer have to do with funding her paymemt of a French house??
Very drunk??? She was walking thru security OK...if she was "very drunk" she would have been staggering.Quote:
Originally Posted by frisson