https://hindigaurav.com/news/indian-...irlines-flight
Thoughts?
Bro probably read up this thread
https://www.aus99forum.com/showthrea...ght-stewardess
Nothing to say here except that all molesters, paedophiles, rapists of any kind or race should be criminally charged and locked away. Fuck them.
So how does this actually work; Indian bloke assaults an air hostess mid-flight over international airspace. Since the hostess is from Singapore, therefore Singaporean laws apply so the cunt could get caned, fined or 3years in prison.
So hypothetically, if the chick was from Saudi Arabia or the UAE (where the laws are as strict as fuck), would the cunt be looking at castration and/or life in prison?
Rajat (offender named in the article) is one of the many Indian men who are giving all Indian men a bad name.
It's why many Japanese and Korean WLs have "No Indians" rule on their shop websites.
Even non-punting sites, like dating sites, have most women refuse to meet or date Indian men.
Goes to show that reputation is everything. In my view, it is not racism.
Interesting - Thai Airways is facing a backlash from Thai women because they've been successfully targeting Indian customers to the airline, but now Thais are looking at non-direct flights to Thailand to avoid them.
Blokes can’t help themselves but open a new thread every time they come across news related to a certain race.
Of course the cunt that did this should be locked away. Coz he’s a criminal.
That has nothing to do with his race, or “no Indian” signs at brothels, or Thai prostitutes allegedly avoiding Indian customers. Same old stereotyped shit regurgitated in every one of these fucking threads, by the same old shitstains. It’s like they are fucking obsessed with bagging one race. Did some Indian gangbanger molest all yer mamas or something?
I'd like to know how one individual can have an affect on the reputation of hundreds of millions of men, which is what you seem to be suggesting to an individual.
And ethno-political mind games? Please be serious.
Just to re-iterate what I've said here before, I don't think the girls who don't see Indian guys as being racist. THe problem here is dudes who see any opportunity to say all Indians are shit and stink etc etc ad nauseum. That is racist by definition.
And those dudes who say, "It's not racist if it's true," are either too dumb to think of an actual argument, or just enjoy being racist. But at least admit it and don't hide behind bullshit six word slogans.
I think we all knew the type of offender before clicking into the thread
Just like every terrorism offence in the world is only perpetrated by Muslims?
Just like every mugging incident in NYC is always by an African American?
Just like the dishevelled stinky bloke lying on the side of George Street is always white and middle aged?
Just like every gang war shooting in Western Sydney is either by someone from a middle eastern or Sudanese background?
And just like every under teen rapist in Australia is always an Abdallah or Hafiz or Muhammad?
Talk about stereotypes, your brains are fed so much horseshit from the very beginning, you know no better.
There is statistics, and then there is stereotypical racism where you paint a whole community for the actions of a rotten few. Maybe that’s the only way you can rationalise the world, if so, I pity you and your way of life
Who knows, perhaps the reporter that wrote the article was racist and assumed the bloke was Indian when in fact the cunt was probably Pakistani or Bangladeshi.
Notwithstanding all the above, stereotypes exist because people notice patterns. They can be a starting point for making sense of the world quickly. The trick is knowing when to move beyond that starting point to dig deeper, look closer, and understand how and why those patterns arise in the first place
So when ChadThunder stereotypes punters as being low value old bald fat farangs, or that chicks willingly provide free extras for blokes that look like Brad Pitt or Chris Hemsworth or that all Japanese sex workers have host club debts, he's basically creating a foundation or a starting point from which to make sense and understand the industry and the punting scene.
Anyway, this chick makes some interesting observations about the replacement theory in Europe. Whether she’s on the money or just a narrow‑minded racist, she’s ain't that bad a sort and I wouldn’t kick her out of bed for farting.
https://youtu.be/yWlSJ_GFTJU?si=s4w7llh_eYvXfT2m
There’s the rule and then there’s “the exception to the rule”. Statistically it’s safer to follow the accepted rule when dealing with certain individuals.
I’d hazard a guess and say that due to a certain place’s location in Cleveland street that they’re snap bang right in the middle of a pocket of… for lack of a better term “multiculturalism”. Hence the “no” signage. I did a count maybe six months ago of the premises in the area and there were twenty five that cater for people from a certain subset.
No doubt some staff post here so it’s obvious why certain threads get written.
It’d be like setting up a candy shop atop of a large ants nest and expecting no ants, do the signs stop ants? No, but the signs are up.
You use statistical evidence to improve your health and fitness and people call you smart. You use statistical evidence to protect yourself from sexual assault and people call you racist. Tough life for a prostitute
Can't argue with that, but per capita the stats and data sets do tell an interesting story........just saying
https://www.tbsnews.net/world/countr...cidents-144499
@double_adapter, the cunt is probably Indian if his name is indeed Rajat as reported by someone else on this thread. And if that is true, the reporter isn’t being racist, she or he is simply reporting the fact. However, a news report about one Indian bloke getting arrested for assault doesn’t mean that a few hundred million Indian blokes are all perverts and rapists. Just like the few billion Muslims that live on this planet are not all radical terrorists. I have given enough examples of such meaningless stereotypes.
You are quite right, patterns are a helpful tool to make sense of the world. However, when patterns are taken out of context and weaponised to make sweeping generalisations about 18% of the world’s population, that simply reeks of ignorance, not intelligence.
I listened to the Dutch chick’s speech and frankly, when someone describes the native population of an entire continent with adjectives such as “white” and “christian”, it is evident that their way of thinking is one-dimensional and exclusionist. Sure, maybe the history of the Netherlands and most of Europe may be that. But that’s certainly not the history of Australia. News flash: The “native” population of this continent ain’t white nor christian. So all the 5th/6th generation white blokes that constantly spew vile shite about other races on this forum, guess what? you cunts aren’t native to this country either. None of us are. So to follow the “go back to where you came from” doctrine that they love to preach, they should all get the fuck off this island as well.
I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again, there will be no dearth of human shitstains that will continue to post on this forum and persevere with their ignorant shit about Indians and other sub-continental peoples. It is perhaps the only way they can feel good about their own miserable existence. Ah… the ginza prostitutes don’t exclude my kind, fuck I must be a superior being. Congrats, that is top notch validation haha
It's bloody tough out there that's for sure. Thats a confusing list though!
"5. Bermuda
Bermuda is the fifth country with 67.30 rate of rape and 43 incidents in per 100,000 people.
6. Sweden
Sweden has 63.50 rape rate and around 5,960 incidents in per 100,000 people, according to World Population Review data."
Wikipedia has quite different stats (England and Wales don't come out well!) but they do point out:
"This table indicates the annual number of recorded rapes per capita by country for last available year.[8] Each entry is based on that country's definition of rape, which varies widely throughout the world. It does not specify whether recorded means reported, brought to trial, or convicted. It does not include cases of rape which go unreported or unrecorded.[12][13] Alternative estimates can show large differences, such as South Africa having around 500,000 rapes per year,[14] or Egypt having more than 20,000 rapes a year.[15]"
So it seems like its actually difficult to get meaningful statistics.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_statistics