Just as per topic, I figure out some of the other preferences I didn't have a chance to ask, why Asian only?
Is it a matter of hair/smell/size/look/care or something else?
Just curious.
Printable View
Just as per topic, I figure out some of the other preferences I didn't have a chance to ask, why Asian only?
Is it a matter of hair/smell/size/look/care or something else?
Just curious.
From my experience, the average Aussie WL would refuse to do half of what the average young Asian girl will do anyway, and if she did, she'd probably ask for a house deposit to do it.....
I must admit - all things being equal, I probably prefer caucasians over Asians - hey, I'm a boob guy. But - the young J girls provide a fucking great experience! :)
It’s a Chinese shop to begin with and most of the customers are Chinese. And the popular girls, or the hottest ones, can afford to turn away other customers without affecting their income
some whites have BO and also a superiority complex when visiting asian working ladies.
Whoever can answer this question should be nominated as spokesperson for all Ginza WLs.
lol it's not just Ginza but any shop. Specifically, it'll all depend on the girl.
Everyone's 'answer' is correct - whether they heard it directly from a WL or from other punters or they made it up based on their own ideas or experiences with people in general.
It's not some big secret - just requires everyone to think a little more and maybe past their own experiences (okay, maybe that is a bit of a big ask here).
But the real answer to why some WLs will or won't only see particular people is: NO ONE FUCKING REALLY KNOWS EXCEPT THE INDIVIDUAL GIRL THEMSELVES.
As an example, here's what I've been able to glean from my time reading people's responses on this forum:
Generally speaking, no Indian tag is common because Indian customers (and those who look Indian) have a reputation for being troublesome (with WLs and their agents/reception services).
Whether it's actually true or not doesn't matter at this point (so don't pile on with your racism - thinly veiled or not).
The point is, the ones who do have 'No Indian' might have had bad experiences with Indian (or Indian-looking) customers and have a blanket ban on seeing them.
You can also see this with some girls who start off at a shop without it, but then a day or two later do have it.
But, there are also WLs (many long term/experienced) who don't have the tag and probably do have them as customers, and have had no issues with them.
Then there are punters here who have said they've asked a WL directly, and the girl's answer was either that they had bad experiences with them or that they heard horror stories from other WLs.
So there are some WLs who won't see Indian clients without ever actually having ever had one.
And if I were to make up a reason from nothing - based on the supposed reputation of Indian customers being more rough than others, maybe some reception/managers put the restriction on automatically for some girls who are smaller, or new to the industry, or whatever reason, or steer those clients away from those girls when making recommendations and bookings. (Maybe Abs90 or some other people who've managed girls can confirm my suspicion of that being a possible protocol in shops).
Same goes with the 'Asian only' tag.
Could be because we Asians have, on average, smaller dicks (like mine).
Could be because some of the girls have had terrible experiences with white people or heard white people have a reputation of being rough or horrible (not saying it's true or not - just saying it's a possible thing they heard or experienced).
Could be because they think Asians tip better.
Could be because their astrologer told them they have to stick with Asians because Asians are obviously more spiritual and have a closer connection to karmic balance.
Point is: it's not a good question, because while there are some general themes and commonalities, in the end, it can only be answered by each individual and only for themselves, not for everyone.
If you're not allowed to see a WL, just move on and don't take it personally, because it's not about you, and no one other than the WL themselves know why the restriction is in place.
(Unless the restriction is just you being banned. Then you can probably go fuck yourself. Probably.)
My question was not to troll or flame, just to understand a bit more what's going on, I was asking why the WL prefer to go Asian only, but my guesses are as good as anyone else.
Might be a combination of things, also there seems to be a bit of confusion, my question wasn't clear, I was a bit curious on why many WL, especially the ones that are looking amazing are accepting Asian customer only, I asked about the "No Indian" to get an idea and got few answers but I am just curious. So overall is a combination of things as I guessed is hair/smell/size/look/care/bad attitude/creating problems so the reason is that identifiable, I thought there was more a common theme across why. Cheerio tho.
The whole world, not only in the sex industry, has a thing about how "cheap" Indians are, and how they try to negotiate prices down and/or extract more products and services for their money. Even Russell Peters makes jokes about it. Example: https://www.tiktok.com/@comedy_castl...nder_device=pc
Seems Indians have ruined it for all other nationalities! Was at 42G and the guy in next cubicle was arguing that he is not Indian and started speaking in Portuguese. I think it is not about your passport anymore but your skin color.
Noticed K Dolce at Ginza is now Western only which has got to be a rarity. She must be hella popular as most punters I see there are Asian. Very seldom see indian punters.
Everyone is going to say something different, and while it is AN answer, it's not THE ONLY answer, because they tend to frame it as the only possibility, when the reality is it could be any of the ones that we've said here, or something completely unknown.
The point is, you'll never know. And even when some of them tell punters the reason, it might not be true, or the full picture.
So it's better you just move on and don't think about it.
Because some punters take it personally or use it to flex their racist views and come here to complain or start an argument.
If you're restricted from seeing someone, don't question it, don't think about it, just move on
Most East Asians literally can't have BO though: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Body_odor#ABCC11
For some, yes, for some, other reasons.
I speculated in another thread based on reports here that she likely got lots of complaints from Asian customers for being too skinny which is why she probably got sick of the complaints and went Western only (which ed69 later confirmed to be true).
Rarest one I've seen was 'No Indonesian', which really makes me wonder what happened because it was a J girl.
I understand what you’re saying — sometimes knowing more helps reduce stereotypes, if possible. I don’t get hung up on things, even if that’s how my post might come across. I also don’t take personal preferences negatively.
I tend to approach this like a sport: if there’s something you can do to meet more partners and contribute positively, then that’s a good thing.
Why so many hot girls at Ginza are Asian only?
You mean 4 out of the 43 rostered across both shops today?
So less than 10%?
Doesn't seem like many.
I thought you guys were good at math.
The influx of Indians post 2020 ruined quite a bit of punting - asking for discount, trying to take condom off midway etc. Caucasians and Asians are realistically what most girls go for now days as clients.
Asians can absolutely have bad smells from hygiene - bad breath (met a few WLs with this issue), not washing their asses, smelly feet, not washing their clothes properly.
I was replying to the comment about body odour (which is different to hygiene) and pointing out that it likely wouldn't be body odour that was causing Asians to smell.
But sure, whatevs