Printable View
Dear admin,
Can you please do us all a favour and ban users "hank79" and "Mick Aussie" as they are obviously the one person abusing the purpose of this forum for the genuine punters out there. I think I speak for many (correct me if I'm wrong fellow punters) that his/her IP address be blocked. In the meantime will have to put the degenerate on our ignore lists.
Cheers
Seeing you so confident I bet you $1000 Australian I not hank. Happy to take up bet with anyone that I not hank. Never met hank, will sign stat Dec to prove for another $1000.Quote:
Originally Posted by jiveturkey
Agreed. These 'two' are on my ignore list.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Is this forum moderated at all?
Why not include a reason why this user(s) should be banned?
I would start a thread asking if anyone has ever seen Hank and Mick online at the same time.
Wold Citizen: because he/they keep posting blatantly false "reviews" and, for example, claiming that pics are real when they're of well-known porn stars.
I really doubt Asa Akira is sucking cock for $200 an hour over at the Southern Cross Motel.
Yep you have my 100% support with this thread....
Only a Pimp could put a post up telling New Forum members seeking information that photo's on Cracker are 100% authentic....
I observed they had, but this can easily be achieved using a laptop and a smartphoneQuote:
Originally Posted by IamSam
Good observation and valid point!
I guess any member could do this to pimp a girl or disagree with others.
Quote:
Originally Posted by brownwallaby
Doesn't even need two separate devices. Can be done on laptop or a smartphone by using two different browsers. Of course that will show up as using the same ip address but only the admin can tell if thats the case.Quote:
Originally Posted by brownwallaby
How about we at least get the ball rolling by giving a warning for creating a recommendation in the after report but not giving a review of said recommendation. Surely that warrants something to be done and goes against the purpose of the after report section
i say photo 100% safety.....is not make me dishoner......I see girl fase in fase......if u not believe me......not problem with me. i try to help you guys, and some u guys be hard.....so other guy here good. so now i not post anymore.....only if a hav recommend do i post for future.......you all happy now:surprise:
Would you just STFU. Which means Shut The Fuck Up, as I'm sure google translate would have a bit of trouble with that acronym.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank79
The only reason I haven't blocked your stupid face is to see when you would eventually get the message through that pea sized brain of yours that no one here believes you and just wants you to stop posting fake, bullshit filled reviews about your hoes.
I truly hope you stop posting anything at all from now on, as you claim.
I am very happy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Hank79
Save yourself the trouble…DON'T POST ANY RECOMMEND IN THE FUTURE!!!!!!
Wow u guys in QLD show no mercy on members that post biased hyped up reviews!
Check the trail leading up to this post you will understandQuote:
Originally Posted by IamSam
Yeah I had a look, and it's good u guys take out the trash!
Quote:
Originally Posted by icanfly
While I think Hank and Mick are both fucktards, by being so obviously dodgy with their "reviews" it actually makes them harder to believe lol. In a funny way, I dont mind if they stay since if they say so and so is legit, I immediately assume otherwise. Its just as a good as legit review from any of you or me lol
Hank and Mick have gone too far now going and replying to just about every thread in after report section trying to push cracker girls on to us and bad mouthing other members. They both have to go thanks
No bad mouth, pulling guy up on illegal service and agree with hank cracker safer and more more legal.