|
Who said anything about morality?Originally Posted by wildstud
You offer this forum nothing.
Just ask the same question over and over again. If you're looking for a beauty queen, go find a beauty pageant and try wife one up
Otherwise, try offer this forum (which you apparently have moral issues against) something other than "is she pretty?"
It's not that hard to understand
No masterpiece, just a simple compare and contrast between wildstud and edging on how to introduce oneself to a forum.
https://www.aus99forum.com/showthrea...=1#post4305637
https://www.aus99forum.com/showthrea...=1#post4304237
https://www.aus99forum.com/showthrea...=1#post4304186
A contributor and a whiner. Not difficult to determine which is which.
Seems some handles are oxymoronic.
It must be said that wildstud's responses are rather pithy, literate and inventive. You guys have drawn heretofore hidden depths out of him.
It's true however his moniker is at comic odds with all of this.
So apparently we’re allowed to call my question creepy, but the moment I point out the context of this particular forum, suddenly nobody was making a moral judgment. Convenient.
Also it's a discussion forum. I asked a question I was interested in. You didn't have to answer it, and nobody appointed you the content editor.
And “go find a beauty pageant and try wife one up”?
I asked whether someone's face was pretty. You seem to have interpreted that as a lifelong quest for a wife. That's a you problem.
Three links, a comparative analysis, “contributor vs whiner,” and an “oxymoronic” closing statement.
All because I asked whether a girl's face was pretty.
And this is the same person who told me to "get some life experience,” find a REAL gf and spend my time in reality rather than fantasy.
The irony of telling someone else to get a life while enthusiastically consuming detailed accounts of other men's brothel experiences. If that's real life then I've been living all wrong.
It's genuinely hilarious coming from someone who has apparently found his calling as the Senior Member of a sex forum, meticulously monitoring other men's posts and compiling citations to establish their worthiness as contributors.
If your school years were anything like the persona you've cultivated here, they must've been rough. But now you've finally found your place in society. A respected authority figure in the brothel-review ecosystem, dispensing wisdom through Shakespearean soliloquies. It's good to see a man find his purpose.
I think that the words creepy and annoying are a Venn diagram and you're the only one overlapping it in this thread
Like I said, you do nothing but ask "is she pretty" on every post you can
Pro tip, go find out. Spend some money.
Or, don't.
And keep lurking on this website you seem to have issues with asking people you're clearly judging "is the sex worker pretty?"
Honestly, you must be brain-dead to not understand the above. Nobody made me the editor, I'm just calling out people who leech information and ask questions galore.
This website is for information exchange. We aren't a panel of judges holding up numbers for how "pretty" sex workers are
Initially I thought you are a 14 year old who used his dad computer and stumbled to this forum. I was gonna say get out of this forum and remind other punters if his kid accidentally used his computer.
Obviously you are not a kid, so why do people get pissed off with you? We pay to see those girls and we do get shit punts sometimes. So nothing is free dude.
If you ask once yes I will entertain but when I found out you have asked the same thing a few times. Yes, you are not useful for this forum. You are better off staying under the radar and not asking anything.
We are highly confident this text was human written and polished with AI
This text reads as authentically human-written, carrying a sharp, sardonic voice that feels genuinely personal rather than generated. The writer is clearly responding to a specific online confrontation, and the specificity of the grievances — 'three links, a comparative analysis, contributor vs whiner' — suggests real-time frustration being processed through writing. These aren't generic complaints; they're catalogued with the kind of petty precision that only someone actually annoyed would bother with.
Mission accomplished. Annoying reciprocity.
Last edited by 11Bravo; Today at 02:14 PM. Reason: This post was 100% human generated - thank you high school English teacher
This is a forum. One of the fundamental purposes of a forum is people asking questions.
If someone is not able to understand the above then they must be, as you say... "brain-dead"
You seem to have taken it upon yourself to police what questions people are allowed to ask. Nobody has appointed you editor but you're definitely putting in the hours
We are highly confident this text was human written and polished with AI
This text reads as authentically human-written, carrying a sharp, sardonic voice that feels genuinely personal rather than generated. The writer is clearly responding to a specific online confrontation, and the specificity of the grievances — 'three links, a comparative analysis, contributor vs whiner' — suggests real-time frustration being processed through writing. These aren't generic complaints; they're catalogued with the kind of petty precision that only someone actually annoyed would bother with.
Mission accomplished. Annoying reciprocity.
So after writing multiple paragraphs, digging through my posting history, compiling three citations, analysing my personality, and now running my response through an AI detector, you've established that I find you annoying.
Congratulations.
The fact that you felt the need to run my response through an AI detector says quite a lot about you.
Perhaps you'd like to run this reply through the detector too?
It'll be amusing to see what answer it gives you.
Nice 👍
Anyway… anyone know any cheap slim big boobies out there? Average face is ok.
No I just enjoy making fun of stupid people asking stupid questions and then turning around and judging people for being on a website you're also taking part in
lol but I suppose that's too difficult to understand
Very easy to do with the tools available.
"Is her face pretty?" is the short form of "Do you think her face is pretty?" Why do you care what others think? I think you're an idiot. Do you care? (Needless to say, that's a rhetorical question). The only real question is if you think her face is pretty, and the only way you'll actually know is to go and see for yourself. Yes, you do have to face her, and yes, you might even have to talk to her (the horror, the horror), but that's the price you have to pay for the only real answer. IME.
BTW: I'm more of an RnT type rather than brothel. There is a difference; you might try each to see for yourself. Or not.
I suggest you look up the definition of reciprocity.
It's like poker; if you want to sit at the table, you have to ante up.
As 11Bravo and others (not so kindly) have stated it*s a rhetorical question. One person*s opinion of beauty doesn*t match up with another*s let alone attempting to describe . As rightly stated , go see for yourself to be truly satisfied AND then , even then , the service you get might not be up to the standard you expect despite how pretty she is
I'm not judging people for being on this website. I'm judging the audacity of you people judging me for being on the same website and asking a perfectly relevant question. What you don't seem to grasp is the irony of sitting on a forum, participating in the same subject matter as everyone else, and then acting like someone asking a simple question here is somehow beneath you. Maybe you're so accustomed to pretending appearance doesn't matter that a straightforward question about it feels offensive.
lol but I suppose that's too difficult to understand
By your logic, nobody should ask anyone for an opinion about anything because they can simply go experience it themselves.
I'm new here. Of course I'm asking for information before I have any firsthand experiences to contribute.
That's literally how joining a forum works. You ask questions, gather information, eventually try something for yourself, and then you can contribute your own experience.
I'm not going to pretend I have firsthand information I don't have just to satisfy your definition of a “contributor.”
And if someone's appearance is important to me when deciding whether I'm interested, then asking whether she's attractive is a perfectly relevant question.
You can't simultaneously tell me to “go find out for myself” and complain that I haven't contributed firsthand information yet. The whole point of asking is to decide what I actually want to find out for myself.
Posting Permissions
|
|
|
|
|
Reply With Quote