Quote Originally Posted by Taffpost View Post
That defence actually doesn’t work.

If you’re on the premises that illegal practices are offered it’s up to you to prove that you were not partaking. There is no presumption of innocence when circumstantial evidence says the contrary.
Yes it does, and has actually been used. The law states

" It is also an offence under s. 229I of the Criminal Code for a person, without reasonable excuse, to be found in or leaving a place suspected on reasonable grounds of being used for the purposes of prostitution by two or more sex workers"

Getting a legitimate massage is a reasonable excuse and the burden of proof is on the prosecution to prove otherwise.