Quote Originally Posted by JSteel96 View Post
There's too many holes in Higgins story she changed the story / facts several times and was blind drunk at the time of the alleged incident. She is not reliable in court to back up her claim how can she remember what happened when drunk off her face? I am so tired of seeing this BS case on the news every night.
She states she had the smell on her after the alleged assault. Right there she would have had the DNA sample to put the guy behind bars, if only she had gone to the police, none of these now meaningless trials would be going ahead.

She didn't want to lose her job, understood, but there was zero way she was going to keep her job the day her boss found out she had sex in the Ministers office. The security found her naked on her bosses couch. Fact

Simple rule. If you work in a high security department in Canberra, do not go into Parliament House late at night with a man when you are really drunk. It will not end well