Actually, Bong Kong, as I have already said on her blog in response to a similar suggestion, that I’m a supporter of Christmas, but it isn’t from a sexual angle. I’m already well taken care of in that regard, and retired from punting a couple of years ago. (I only ever punted between gfs’ just to keep the machinery working.)
It is Chelsea’s efforts in writing that most interest me. Few if any of you could pump out 1500 - 2000 biographically entertaining words as she does. If you could you’d be doing it.
She’s got an interesting back story to draw from and she also relates current events. Eg. Her stone dildo saga. She told anecdotes about her failed relationships while she waited for the dildo to heat up. But then it went cold again, so she had time to tell more anecdotes. It had a comic structure and the absurd context is also funny. Her insights into Korean culture (as at the wedding, and family matters) add other layers.
I see how her writing develops its own momentum as she is putting it down. Related ideas she hadn’t thought of when she begins the piece arise in unexpected and relevant connections. You’ll see the same person at work in her gif ideas (as Azninvasion pointed out.) The gifs often aren’t always literal to the topic, but they hit the spot in often unexpected ways. Humour is the oil of communication, and it is a talent more than most people realise.
These are objective facts about Christmas’s work and they have got nil to do with the fact that she is in possession of a vagina and tits. Except as her female experience informs her writing. I understand however it is the quickest explanation that I’m coming solely from a sexual angle in my support of her. I’m male and she’s female right? So that must be the end of the story. But Microbro, for example, is thinking only with his dick here. Which I suppose literally makes him a dickhead. Or in his case, a microdickhead.
Sure, Chelsea is not exactly D H Lawrence, but you’ll agree she has a unique voice. The forum has seen no-one like her and I admit freely to being encouraging of her efforts.
I also admit I’m being selfish in liking Christmas’s english as it is. I find it entertaining. It doesn’t interfere at all with her communication. She thinks it does, but I think it enhances it. But that is my opinion and experience. So Cunninglinguist was right to chide me about that and I’m sorry for attempting to interfere on her course of self-improvement for my own amusement. But guys, don’t you also prefer her saying
“I want a sexual intercourse!”
I hardly understand many of the english rules being put down here either.
